- Joined
- Apr 6, 2013
- Messages
- 34,377
- Reaction score
- 69,040
The trial is over for me:
I think she is guilty, but insane, but because of the laws, it would have to be; Not guilty by reason of insanity. I hope that every year, every day, every hour, and every second that she lives from now on, that she will ask for forgiveness for the terrible sin of killing her children and the heartache she has brought to her husband. I hope that Parker can find some peace, knowing he didn't know how to help JS fully and it wasn't his fault- not even the MDs knew how, IMO. JS certainly didn't know how to help herself, never mind her children and her husband. She needs help- a lot of help and I hope she receives it.
I believe Dr. Meyers assessment of JS. He made a lot of sense as to how JS was thinking when she killed her children. On the other hand, Dr. Otto had too many "possible" answers-" Anything is possible, but not likely?". Why/how would he know what is likely to happen in every case? That means it is 'possible" that Dr. Meyers 's evaluation of JS can be correct. It really shows me that MI, when analyzed by different MDs, is really a matter of subjective opinions and theories by each MD and insanity is also subjective. MI and insanity interpretations are not set in stone here. I see Frasier and Niles arguing , who is the better Psychiatrist and who has the better assessments.
"she did indeed know that what she was doing was wrong. They provided insight as to the fact that her actions before and after the murders were very telling into her state of mind and her knowing that the murders were wrong. "
Yes she knew that what she was doing was wrong, but only as it relates to the outside world. In her mind she was saving the children and what she was doing was right, IMO- this was her delusion ("fixed false belief"- that her children would be better off dead.).
I stand by my verdict right now and nothing the Prosecutor will say anymore will convince me otherwise.
I think she is guilty, but insane, but because of the laws, it would have to be; Not guilty by reason of insanity. I hope that every year, every day, every hour, and every second that she lives from now on, that she will ask for forgiveness for the terrible sin of killing her children and the heartache she has brought to her husband. I hope that Parker can find some peace, knowing he didn't know how to help JS fully and it wasn't his fault- not even the MDs knew how, IMO. JS certainly didn't know how to help herself, never mind her children and her husband. She needs help- a lot of help and I hope she receives it.
I believe Dr. Meyers assessment of JS. He made a lot of sense as to how JS was thinking when she killed her children. On the other hand, Dr. Otto had too many "possible" answers-" Anything is possible, but not likely?". Why/how would he know what is likely to happen in every case? That means it is 'possible" that Dr. Meyers 's evaluation of JS can be correct. It really shows me that MI, when analyzed by different MDs, is really a matter of subjective opinions and theories by each MD and insanity is also subjective. MI and insanity interpretations are not set in stone here. I see Frasier and Niles arguing , who is the better Psychiatrist and who has the better assessments.
"she did indeed know that what she was doing was wrong. They provided insight as to the fact that her actions before and after the murders were very telling into her state of mind and her knowing that the murders were wrong. "
Yes she knew that what she was doing was wrong, but only as it relates to the outside world. In her mind she was saving the children and what she was doing was right, IMO- this was her delusion ("fixed false belief"- that her children would be better off dead.).
I stand by my verdict right now and nothing the Prosecutor will say anymore will convince me otherwise.