Gardenista
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2016
- Messages
- 19,034
- Reaction score
- 182,265
All rise!
I don't think official records need a witness. Self-authenticating.How would they enter that if she didn't testify? What witness would/could they ask about it?
Sworn testimony may be admitted as long as it is relevant. Thus, when they have the economic expert on the stand they can ask, "Did you review the sworn testimony of Ms. Magbanua regarding her income?" Then they can read it just like they "published" the text messages.How would they enter that if she didn't testify? What witness would/could they ask about it?
We will know. The jury count will be a public record even though jurors aren't identified by name.Will they poll the jury or will we never know who the holdout(s) was???
yes but without her would CA have been able to find someone through his other contacts to kill him? we will never know. JMOMaybe this is a gift you guys. At least SG is going away.
Justice for Dan.
I agree. This is ultimately going to be good news. She's under the "sword of damocles" more than ever and the prosecution can now charge CA and DA.Maybe this is a gift you guys. At least SG is going away.
Justice for Dan.