What a tragic case.
Obviously, it can be argued that this kid is a product of his environment and upbringing. Yet, it's really not possible to say he was born evil, is it? Assuming he was negatively affected by the unfortunate circumstances of his short life, isn't it reasonable to assume he could be positively affected with the proper care and attention? How can he not be given the benefit of the doubt?
He was already written off by those who should have helped him once and we know how that turned out. IMO, it would compound this tragedy to write him off again.
Obviously, it can be argued that this kid is a product of his environment and upbringing. Yet, it's really not possible to say he was born evil, is it? Assuming he was negatively affected by the unfortunate circumstances of his short life, isn't it reasonable to assume he could be positively affected with the proper care and attention? How can he not be given the benefit of the doubt?
He was already written off by those who should have helped him once and we know how that turned out. IMO, it would compound this tragedy to write him off again.