- Joined
- Jul 13, 2011
- Messages
- 5,324
- Reaction score
- 28,275
Me too, but this release from the judge seems normal to me.
I was pretty certain that it has always been the way that cameras and electronic devices were not allowed in Federal courtrooms; some of the reactions on here have me doubting myself though.
Any legal experts around that can actually answer this? NORMAL ruling ... or not?
Cameras are very rarely allowed in federal court. Phones are commonly allowed, this district seems to be an outlier.