GUILTY FL - Lonzie Barton, 2, Jacksonville, 24 July 2015 - #8

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #821
Lonna checks for the camera in the interrogation room, mentions it and looks over at it. She looks up at the camera when RE mentions that Lonna borrowed someone's car earlier in the day because his starter wasn't working. When she goes in to talk to RE, she has a blanket and then cuddles with RE with the blanket over both of them. Did she pass him something? She wasn't that cold in there, she isn't shivering at all.

When she asked for a tampon, was that a way for her to pass him something as well? I don't trust her. She winks at the camera, it's as if she's always aware that she is being watched. JMO
 
  • #822
Lonna checks for the camera in the interrogation room, mentions it and looks over at it. She looks up at the camera when RE mentions that Lonna borrowed someone's car earlier in the day because his starter wasn't working. When she goes in to talk to RE, she has a blanket and then cuddles with RE with the blanket over both of them. Did she pass him something? She wasn't that cold in there, she isn't shivering at all.

When she asked for a tampon, was that a way for her to pass him something as well? I don't trust her. She winks at the camera, it's as if she's always aware that she is being watched. JMO

I'll say again what I said before the last time her winking was mentioned - I think she's just a little paranoid of the cameras and hyperaware of their existence. I know when I first started working at my current job, the extremely visible camera presence got to me a bit, and I found myself constantly watching them for the first few weeks. I still do, somewhat. I'm always looking over my shoulder at them, and sometimes I make exaggerated facial expressions while I work so it's clear what I'm doing in case someone is watching. In her case, she KNOWS someone's watching. I don't find her fixation on the cameras weird at all.
 
  • #823
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #824
Considering she lied directly to police about her kid and knowing RE, I'd say she's either anti-authoritarian or hiding evidence of a murder. JMO
 
  • #825
(snipped)

"I do not believe my baby was murdered. That's one thing that I refuse to believe, that evidence has not been put in my face, or on paper or in proof in front of me and that's one thing that I will not come to terms with, as far as even my baby not being alive, because until someone can prove otherwise, my b- I hope I … I can't help but I hope that someone has him that is taking good care of him."

http://www.firstcoastnews.com/story...rents-interview-believe-child-alive/31758843/

Four days later, on August 18, she was arrested for child neglect and lying to the police. So far we've heard her say that she thought CB was the perp and then she changed her mind, that Ebron knew where Lonzie was, that she believes Lonzie is alive and finally that maybe Lonzie got into drugs and overdosed.

I find it odd that both Lonna and Chris said the same basically the same thing...They do not believe Lonzie has been murdered and they believe or hope he is being taken care of .... This could be why neither of them are showing any anger, worry, or shed any real tears...they know where Lonzie is...It is possible they have sold or given him away.

"Despite the fact that police are now considering this a homicide case, he believes Lonzie is alive and being loved."
"I think that he's out there somewhere, that he's happy that he's playing and making someone else smile, the way he makes us smile," Barton said.
http://www.news4jax.com/news/local/...believes-boy-is-alive-wifes-telling-the-truth


Classito
 
  • #826
I find it odd that both Lonna and Chris said the same basically the same thing...They do not believe Lonzie has been murdered and they believe or hope he is being taken care of .... This could be why neither of them are showing any anger, worry, or shed any real tears...they know where Lonzie is...It is possible they have sold or given him away.

"Despite the fact that police are now considering this a homicide case, he believes Lonzie is alive and being loved."
"I think that he's out there somewhere, that he's happy that he's playing and making someone else smile, the way he makes us smile," Barton said.
http://www.news4jax.com/news/local/...believes-boy-is-alive-wifes-telling-the-truth


Classito

I don't think it's odd. CB is (or at least was at that time) protective of Lonna and IMO he was just following her lead. In the interview she did all the talking while he just echoed some of her comments. After reading his sworn statement and listening to the "secret tapes" I almost feel sorry for him. It's clear that Lonna runs the show and he'll forgive her anything - he even bailed her out of jail after her arrest for child neglect and lying.

The video of CB and Lonna at the motel just hours after the custody hearing - where they agreed to <cough> remain drug free - is sickening and it proves that they have no problem lying if it suits their purpose, even when the future of their daughter is on the line.

Personally, I think Lonna's a lying liar and CB is her puppet who goes along with anything she says.
 
  • #827
I see CB as the agressive one...LB reported CB twice for domestic assault in the past...twice he walked away..Twice LB said she believed her ex took Lonzie...twice it has been ignored...

CB was charged with aggravated battery against LB in Feb 2010. She claimed CB came home intoxicated started yelling and grabbed her by the ankle and arm..pulled her from the couch and out to the porch at which time he kicked her in the stomach. She ran to a neighbors house and called police. The case was dropped/abandoned in June 2010---Case number 022010CF000055CFAXMX

In Sept 2012 he was charged with domestic battery against LB...at this one he pulled LB up by the neck held her arms behind her back and had his daughter beat her...Again the charge was abandoned/dropped even though witnesses backed up LB story...case number 022012MM000665MMAXMX

The sworn statements for both arrest are on the Baker County Clerk website...
https://www2.myfloridacounty.com/ccm/?county=02


Classito
 
  • #828
I see CB as the agressive one...LB reported CB twice for domestic assault in the past...twice he walked away..Twice LB said she believed her ex took Lonzie...twice it has been ignored...

CB was charged with aggravated battery against LB in Feb 2010. She claimed CB came home intoxicated started yelling and grabbed her by the ankle and arm..pulled her from the couch and out to the porch at which time he kicked her in the stomach. She ran to a neighbors house and called police. The case was dropped/abandoned in June 2010---Case number 022010CF000055CFAXMX

In Sept 2012 he was charged with domestic battery against LB...at this one he pulled LB up by the neck held her arms behind her back and had his daughter beat her...Again the charge was abandoned/dropped even though witnesses backed up LB story...case number 022012MM000665MMAXMX

The sworn statements for both arrest are on the Baker County Clerk website...
https://www2.myfloridacounty.com/ccm/?county=02


Classito

Yeah, there's no doubt CB is aggressive; I remember reading about those arrests in the Baker County Press archives way back, before he was allowed to be discussed much here and thinking WTH? It was also noted in the 2012 statement that DCF was called because Lonzie's sister was in the car and possibly witnessed the fight although I don't know if there was any followup.

The 2012 charge is also interesting in that the fight happened around the time when CB and Lonna were separated and Lonna was in a relationship with the man who recently claimed to be Lonzie's father.

But aggressive or not, CB has consistently supported Lonna despite her leaving him at least twice to be with another man, not telling him where she was living in Jacksonville and lying about her feelings for Ebron. That was my point - that he continued to stick up for her and have her back through all of it, so it wouldn't be surprising if he agreed with her that Lonzie had been abducted whether he truly believed it or not.
 
  • #829
So I just dove into this case earlier this weekend. I haven't read everything, but I've read a lot. I looked at all the photos and exhibits over at the blue eyes facebook page. I have a lot of random thoughts about what I've read and seen...all swirling around in my head right now.

Let me preface my post a bit by sharing my story--my own baby son was killed by his bio dad many years ago when I was just a young mom. I truly understand and appreciate the horror and disbelief and bargaining and denial and all the other coping mechanisms that come into play in these situations. I'm not coming at this from an...uneducated standpoint. And I certainly wasn't an ideal example of what to do, either. I said some weird things in my initial shock and fear--there's no way to accurately describe that horrifying helplessness one feels when trying to wrap their head around such a cruel act having been perpetrated on their child.

I also understand the lengths people will go to to get their drug of choice or a reasonable facsimile thereof. People who off drugs are kind and thoughtful won't think twice about stealing their own mom's wedding ring for a bump. Not excusable by any means. Stopping in the middle of the night to get "$20 someone owes" is totally normal in that world--I mean, I suppose one might stop to get $20 if they knew that other person was going to be up and it wasn't about drugs--that's possible, but it's highly probable, to me, that the $20 was drug related and possible some sort of deflection/stalling technique? IDK.

Sorry this is so scattered...

Oh, I was a little surprised their apartment wasn't more trashed...thought the full vacuum shoved in the closet was a bit weird and for some reason stood out to me, but I expected the apartment to be messier for some reason.

In those first interrogation videos from the first night, I thought it was weird that they let RE have his vape pen in the interrogation room. Also takes some cajones to use it in the cop shop, IMO. Of course, if it were me, I'd be too scared to even ask to pee, let alone have the sand to take a puff. I mean, I'm ASSUMING it wasn't shatter he was vaping, but tobacco stuff, but still. He looked like he just wanted out to go get a bump of coke or whatever...didn't I read he'd flushed it before calling the cops? Bet he regretted that most of anything he did that night only because he wishes he'd had time to do it instead of committing "drug abuse" by flushing it.

I'm planning to watch the rest of the interrogation tapes, but didn't want to interrupt Mr. flourish's football just yet as the Bronco's weren't making him happy as it was lol.

But from what I've read here and in the docs, here's my theory, such as it is...also it agrees with many of you, so it's nothing new:

RE hurt Lonzie by either shaking/striking/throwing him causing an internal head injury, but not such severe an injury as to cause immediate death or unconsciousness, but causing his brain to bleed and continue to damage his little body in the hours after the injury. That incident resulted in the lethargy, vomiting, and ear drainage, as well as the bruise, which I'm guessing was not actually a skull fracture per se, but like a dentation kind of injury...idk, when I was little I fell and since I was so young, my arm bone bent vs broke, so I guess I'm thinking of that. Anyway, little guy suffers, mom notices, confronts RE, but doesn't push it as he's Mr. Manipulative Flip-Talker-Deflector and she wants to go to work and doesn't want to deal with missing work or not going in for extra hours or whatever it was and certainly doesn't want to deal with securing care for her children, so she lets it go, possibly against her deep down better judgement, which she'll hate herself for forever and she should, and goes to work.

I'm not really sure what i think happened next. Some ideas involve:
  • RE leaving Lonzie in the bathtub alone, lehtargic and possibly medicated, while texting deals or whatever and Lonzie drown, possibly even injuring himself further in the process (hitting head on faucet or fixture) and RE panics and goes into cover up mode
  • Lonzie chewed on a drug baggie, stuck his hand in some loose coke, or otherwise inadvertadely got into the coke and died as a result. RE found him and freaked and went into cover up mode...
  • RE, allegedly having told LB he didn't want to care for her children anymore, and having already (possibly) hurt Lonzie, shook/struck/threw him again, in frustration and anger but not actual intent to kill, and this time resulting in an immediate or quick death, and RE went into cover up mode
  • I suppose maybe Lonzie fell down the stairs or some other accident happened that was an actual accident, not a "drug accident" and RE covered up but I doubt it
  • RE deliberately, with intent, murdered Lonzie then went into cover up mode

As much as a supreme DB this RE seems like, I'm just not yet convinced that he deliberately and with intent harmed this child. I think he did harm this child, but from negligence or abuse resulting in death, but not cold-blooded "I'm going to kill this baby tonight."

I've even speculated that RE had injured him prior, then tried to stage an accidental injury to "cover up for and explain" the original injury...like, realizing the obvious injury was getting worse, he (or they--I haven't ruled LB out) set up a staged accident intending to seek help for that and it went horribly awry. That's probably just crazy though.

I don't know why he would think he could get away with the car story. That's just stupid...carjackers who find out they've inadvertently snatched a kid don't ditch the car and the car seat and keep the kid. And abductors don't hover around random apartment complexes waiting for someone to leave the car running with a kid inside so they can navigate the complex speed bumps stealing both the car and the kid...if they wanted only a kid they'd probably just take the child in their own vehicle. It just defies logic and precedent.

Judgmental and snarky alert: She's a stripper? So...when she went into work, she's wearing the jean cutoffs/bra with a tube top outfit (Klassy with a capital K), with flat hair and I couldn't tell makeup. At the police station, she's wearing the same outfit with flat hair and sans makeup. Did she do her hair and makeup and change in the club then change again (which I get) but then take her makeup off AND brush her hair out so it's lanky and flat again or does she strip with lanky flat hair? I guess I figured after work strippers changed at the club but then went home to shower and get makeup off and hair washed out or whatever. I know I'd be wanting a shower to get all the leering and ogling feelings off, let alone my makeup and lashes and whatnot. Totally shallow and odd to be thinking about, but I guess I'm just in awe of what men will pay to see naked sometimes. There's a lot to be said for lighting and makeup I suppose. Maybe I did miss out on a good way to have avoided all these student loans LOL. I never thought I was pretty enough even at a younger age, but she makes me reconsider. LOL JK

I'd originally wondered if a third party was involved, who really did "steal" (staged) the car and dump the body for RE, but then after seeing the video of him running back after obviously ditching just the car, not so much.

What else to add to my ever-rambling post...Oh, so the relationship between CB and LB seems to be one based on doing drugs together rather than based on actual love. I used to think my then boyfriend now husband was just a great at co-parenting with his ex, but they were actually better at co-drugging under the guise of co-parenting. (All in the past now no worries).

Oh...I haven't written off the idea that Lonzie perished from the head injury prior to LB going to work, and that she went to work anyway to "appear normal" for their stupid carjacking plan, or even that she left and just told RE to take care of it so that she really didn't know what happened. IDK. I trust her about as far as i can spit her.

And this paternity stuff has me curious too...more gossipy curious, admittedly, but curious nonetheless.

And this new pregnancy...please take it away as soon as possible and give it to someone completely unrelated to all of these folks.

I know I had more to say (really flourish? more?) but that's it for now before my computer freezes again
 
  • #830
  • #831
I've read the dogs indicated for decomp on the car. Did they take the dogs into the apartment??? If so, do we know the results? Hmm...

Also, I did notice the mention by LB of "my ex stole my baby in my bf's car" text...I'm assuming that was a cya kinda maneuver and not an actual suspicion she had?

Oh yeah, the cameras. Cameras make me nervous. I've been known to smile at them in stores. I hate cameras and feel forced when in front of them. When my son was injured, the police interviewed me in a room in the hospital, and there weren't recordings, not even audio, which seems weird now. CASA were the only people who actually recorded my statements using technology and not just taking notes. Very frustrating because then they'd give me written accounts of what I'd "said," but wasn't always correct as they didn't record it. When I'd try to correct them, they'd blow me off with a "oh that little detail doesn't matter," while the other side of their mouth is saying, "every little detail matters." But I do wonder how I would have reacted if I was interrogated at the station, in front of a camera. And I regularly shudder to think of the impulsive things I might have said on social media if that had been around. Oh goodness. But I digress and babble...


In regards to the possible conversation between LB and RE where she says something to the effect of "I know you love me enough to tell me where my baby is and maybe I"m wrong" and he says "you're wrong." So on the surface it seems like he's saying, "no, you are wrong I don't love you enough to tell you where your baby is." But, I would like to hear that conversation for myself. The timing of it could have indicated he's saying "you're wrong" to the entire premise of her sentence which was that he did anything to her baby in the first place. These aren't the most eloquent folks here...so, IDK, I'd rather hear it. Is it available for listening anywhere?
 
  • #832
So I just dove into this case earlier this weekend. I haven't read everything, but I've read a lot. I looked at all the photos and exhibits over at the blue eyes facebook page. I have a lot of random thoughts about what I've read and seen...all swirling around in my head right now.

Let me preface my post a bit by sharing my story--my own baby son was killed by his bio dad many years ago when I was just a young mom. I truly understand and appreciate the horror and disbelief and bargaining and denial and all the other coping mechanisms that come into play in these situations. I'm not coming at this from an...uneducated standpoint. And I certainly wasn't an ideal example of what to do, either. I said some weird things in my initial shock and fear--there's no way to accurately describe that horrifying helplessness one feels when trying to wrap their head around such a cruel act having been perpetrated on their child.

I also understand the lengths people will go to to get their drug of choice or a reasonable facsimile thereof. People who off drugs are kind and thoughtful won't think twice about stealing their own mom's wedding ring for a bump. Not excusable by any means. Stopping in the middle of the night to get "$20 someone owes" is totally normal in that world--I mean, I suppose one might stop to get $20 if they knew that other person was going to be up and it wasn't about drugs--that's possible, but it's highly probable, to me, that the $20 was drug related and possible some sort of deflection/stalling technique? IDK.

Sorry this is so scattered...

Oh, I was a little surprised their apartment wasn't more trashed...thought the full vacuum shoved in the closet was a bit weird and for some reason stood out to me, but I expected the apartment to be messier for some reason.

In those first interrogation videos from the first night, I thought it was weird that they let RE have his vape pen in the interrogation room. Also takes some cajones to use it in the cop shop, IMO. Of course, if it were me, I'd be too scared to even ask to pee, let alone have the sand to take a puff. I mean, I'm ASSUMING it wasn't shatter he was vaping, but tobacco stuff, but still. He looked like he just wanted out to go get a bump of coke or whatever...didn't I read he'd flushed it before calling the cops? Bet he regretted that most of anything he did that night only because he wishes he'd had time to do it instead of committing "drug abuse" by flushing it.

I'm planning to watch the rest of the interrogation tapes, but didn't want to interrupt Mr. flourish's football just yet as the Bronco's weren't making him happy as it was lol.

But from what I've read here and in the docs, here's my theory, such as it is...also it agrees with many of you, so it's nothing new:

RE hurt Lonzie by either shaking/striking/throwing him causing an internal head injury, but not such severe an injury as to cause immediate death or unconsciousness, but causing his brain to bleed and continue to damage his little body in the hours after the injury. That incident resulted in the lethargy, vomiting, and ear drainage, as well as the bruise, which I'm guessing was not actually a skull fracture per se, but like a dentation kind of injury...idk, when I was little I fell and since I was so young, my arm bone bent vs broke, so I guess I'm thinking of that. Anyway, little guy suffers, mom notices, confronts RE, but doesn't push it as he's Mr. Manipulative Flip-Talker-Deflector and she wants to go to work and doesn't want to deal with missing work or not going in for extra hours or whatever it was and certainly doesn't want to deal with securing care for her children, so she lets it go, possibly against her deep down better judgement, which she'll hate herself for forever and she should, and goes to work.

I'm not really sure what i think happened next. Some ideas involve:
  • RE leaving Lonzie in the bathtub alone, lehtargic and possibly medicated, while texting deals or whatever and Lonzie drown, possibly even injuring himself further in the process (hitting head on faucet or fixture) and RE panics and goes into cover up mode
  • Lonzie chewed on a drug baggie, stuck his hand in some loose coke, or otherwise inadvertadely got into the coke and died as a result. RE found him and freaked and went into cover up mode...
  • RE, allegedly having told LB he didn't want to care for her children anymore, and having already (possibly) hurt Lonzie, shook/struck/threw him again, in frustration and anger but not actual intent to kill, and this time resulting in an immediate or quick death, and RE went into cover up mode
  • I suppose maybe Lonzie fell down the stairs or some other accident happened that was an actual accident, not a "drug accident" and RE covered up but I doubt it
  • RE deliberately, with intent, murdered Lonzie then went into cover up mode

As much as a supreme DB this RE seems like, I'm just not yet convinced that he deliberately and with intent harmed this child. I think he did harm this child, but from negligence or abuse resulting in death, but not cold-blooded "I'm going to kill this baby tonight."

I've even speculated that RE had injured him prior, then tried to stage an accidental injury to "cover up for and explain" the original injury...like, realizing the obvious injury was getting worse, he (or they--I haven't ruled LB out) set up a staged accident intending to seek help for that and it went horribly awry. That's probably just crazy though.

I don't know why he would think he could get away with the car story. That's just stupid...carjackers who find out they've inadvertently snatched a kid don't ditch the car and the car seat and keep the kid. And abductors don't hover around random apartment complexes waiting for someone to leave the car running with a kid inside so they can navigate the complex speed bumps stealing both the car and the kid...if they wanted only a kid they'd probably just take the child in their own vehicle. It just defies logic and precedent.

Judgmental and snarky alert: She's a stripper? So...when she went into work, she's wearing the jean cutoffs/bra with a tube top outfit (Klassy with a capital K), with flat hair and I couldn't tell makeup. At the police station, she's wearing the same outfit with flat hair and sans makeup. Did she do her hair and makeup and change in the club then change again (which I get) but then take her makeup off AND brush her hair out so it's lanky and flat again or does she strip with lanky flat hair? I guess I figured after work strippers changed at the club but then went home to shower and get makeup off and hair washed out or whatever. I know I'd be wanting a shower to get all the leering and ogling feelings off, let alone my makeup and lashes and whatnot. Totally shallow and odd to be thinking about, but I guess I'm just in awe of what men will pay to see naked sometimes. There's a lot to be said for lighting and makeup I suppose. Maybe I did miss out on a good way to have avoided all these student loans LOL. I never thought I was pretty enough even at a younger age, but she makes me reconsider. LOL JK

I'd originally wondered if a third party was involved, who really did "steal" (staged) the car and dump the body for RE, but then after seeing the video of him running back after obviously ditching just the car, not so much.

What else to add to my ever-rambling post...Oh, so the relationship between CB and LB seems to be one based on doing drugs together rather than based on actual love. I used to think my then boyfriend now husband was just a great at co-parenting with his ex, but they were actually better at co-drugging under the guise of co-parenting. (All in the past now no worries).

Oh...I haven't written off the idea that Lonzie perished from the head injury prior to LB going to work, and that she went to work anyway to "appear normal" for their stupid carjacking plan, or even that she left and just told RE to take care of it so that she really didn't know what happened. IDK. I trust her about as far as i can spit her.

And this paternity stuff has me curious too...more gossipy curious, admittedly, but curious nonetheless.

And this new pregnancy...please take it away as soon as possible and give it to someone completely unrelated to all of these folks.

I know I had more to say (really flourish? more?) but that's it for now before my computer freezes again

Flourish, I'm so sorry about your sweet baby boy. [emoji175]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #833
I also find it odd that SH---CB's alibi--died a day after being bonded out....Of course that is not the only death close to CB...Timothy Stewart died while camping with CB in 2010....It was called a drowning...somehow he got himself tied to a log under water....Family has been trying to get the case reopened with a petition and a justice for Boog fb page...The sheriff is reviewing the case but says CB was not a suspect...
http://www.actionnewsjax.com/news/n...s-barton-not-suspect-old-drowning-case/nnbqR/

Bond lowered for CB...
http://www.news4jax.com/news/local/baker-county-judge-reduces-chris-bartons-bond-to-115000




Classito
 
  • #834
I also find it odd that SH---CB's alibi--died a day after being bonded out....Of course that is not the only death close to CB...Timothy Stewart died while camping with CB in 2010....It was called a drowning...somehow he got himself tied to a log under water....Family has been trying to get the case reopened with a petition and a justice for Boog fb page...The sheriff is reviewing the case but says CB was not a suspect...
http://www.actionnewsjax.com/news/n...s-barton-not-suspect-old-drowning-case/nnbqR/

Bond lowered for CB...
http://www.news4jax.com/news/local/baker-county-judge-reduces-chris-bartons-bond-to-115000




Classito

CB's alibi for what?
 
  • #835
  • #836
Did CB know before the Dna test was done that he might not be Lonzies dad?
How did his alibi die?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #837
I don't recall if CB said he was with SH that night. but SH was his and Lonna's co defendant in the baker county drug case. he OD'd after he bonded out of jail.

Did CB know before the Dna test was done that he might not be Lonzies dad?
How did his alibi die?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #838
Did CB know before the Dna test was done that he might not be Lonzies dad?
How did his alibi die?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

In his sworn statement CB believed he was Lonzie's father - that was before the DNA results. BTW, it's not clear that LE specifically tested CB for paternity; in the msm article it sounded more like a reporter had an independent expert explain the DNA:

"This person is not the father of that child," says Nancy Peterson, a former Florida Department of Law Enforcement specialist and DNA/forensics expert witness who reviewed the data. According to Peterson, the DNA profiles of Lonzie, his mother Lonna, and Chris Barton contravenes Chris Barton's own sworn statement, police reports, court records – and the claims of the boy's mother.

http://www.firstcoastnews.com/story...-shows-chris-barton-not-lonzies-dad/76738926/

SH was released from jail on Wednesday, October 28. Friday morning he died of a drug overdose.
 
  • #839
CB has never been called a POI in this case by law enforcement. Only by RE during his initial statements to police and during his jailhouse interview with STAR and well, obviously LE has not found RE to be credible in his version of events that night.

Ebron wants to see Lonzie&#8217;s mother, Lonna Lauramore, 25, and wishes to marry her and that they shopped for rings, the Star story said. He also said he was warned about Chris Barton, the boy&#8217;s father, when asked who else police should investigate.

&#8220;Her mother warned them that they should be careful, that he would find out where they lived,&#8221; Ebron told McLaughlin and reporter Dan Evans about the elder Barton
.

Reached by the Times-Union Friday, Barton scoffed and said he has been in
touch with Lonzie&#8217;s mother since the disappearance.

&#8220;I really don&#8217;t care,&#8221; what Ebron said, Barton told the Times-Union. &#8220;He&#8217;s the one with something to hide, not me.&#8221;

Barton said he did not know where Lauramore and Ebron were living.

http://jacksonville.com/news/crime/...se-missing-21-month-old-jacksonville-boy-said

if there is a link stating that SH was CB's "alibi" at the time that Lonzie was reported missing I would like to read it. I surely do not recall that being the case.
 
  • #840
In a filing late Friday, Ebron's public defender says Jacksonville Sheriff's Office detectives illegally searched Ebron's cell phone while he was in police custody. They say their data dive went well beyond what Ebron consented to – which police told him would be "GPS stuff." They also argue that Ebron revoked any implicit consent when he repeatedly asked for his phone back, and was denied.
...
There are a few exceptions, particularly what are called exigent, or emergency circumstances. But Ebron's attorneys contend there was ample time to get a warrant during Ebron's 11 hour police interview. Absent that, they suggest, police should have gotten written consent – like they did when they wanted Ebron's DNA.

In that circumstance, interrogation videos show, detectives took several minutes to inform Ebron of his rights, and to have him sign a consent to search form, before taking a DNA sample.

Attorneys also argue that Ebron's phone, though initially given to police, became an illegal seizure when officers refused to return it. At one point, when he asks for his phone and says he wants to leave, and off screen officer says, "We are keeping the phone."


http://www.firstcoastnews.com/story...ne-illegally-searched-say-attorneys/77318048/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
87
Guests online
2,476
Total visitors
2,563

Forum statistics

Threads
632,711
Messages
18,630,825
Members
243,269
Latest member
Silent_Observer
Back
Top