Whoa, I only meant with that last line...that it really doesn't matter what I think about that 3 seconds of video. I hate giving my opinion on here, because it can so easily be taken the wrong way. I said I feel bad for dad & I do! I also feel terrible for the victims families.
There was things said by Dad that I DID NOT know.
I am with you! Lots of nuance that IMO fits and is helpful. We got one angle of the three hour run at frantic pace . Its hot as hell literally. Adds some notion about the drinking. Obviously I beleive mental issues are hughly invovned while at the same time dehydration, especially for someone who is already sliding can bring on hallucaintions etc .
I am saying that concretly not really. Contirbuatry in some way and expalins two eposides of thirst being overwhelming in two instances within a short peroid of time.
Also got a deydrated guy from the walk that afternoone, walk to moms and wallk back to dads. For someone starting out deyhydrated that ca help with the final act.
I found the walking to the bathroom far more congruent with the tape.
Had some concerns about the decomp (dont know where he was living for how long yet) but obviouly the deteriation started at least (now 6 months) ago - just based on the pecularity of his YT posts.
Had some issues with the piece about his best friend thinking he was joking around. If my best friend was a joker, I would think I would be able to determine if this was him being his usual jokester. If you think about it - if I thought you were just being yourself, why would I engage in conversation with your firends dad about Austin just being Austin- makes no sense.
One would thing friends would be able to determine , for half a year, if he was just joking around or something was starting.
Based on that I would have to conclude that the "friend" knew things were amiss.
Also a bit "lost" about the "psychologist" friend or not, duty to warn is there, I would have said sorry, but I am concenred and as your firend and professionial based on what you describing, Wade, I want you to know I am calling LE and suggusting when they encocnter him they bring him to ER. Just a professional telling them to please do that makes it much more likely to do it and do so quickly - its not their arena.
It would almost be a relief to dad IMO, "I did not have my son committed", but at least he is safe. Aftrer a couple of years, I really did not have "trouble" converting a need for invol to agreeing to go. It may have taken some time, but if done if with empathy , not engaging, like I saw so many do, in a power and control deal quietly for the pt there is releif - they are in a safe place, not alone, and can be placed in less stimulating environs which can help calm the brain.
Often after DC they would thank me. Lots of clincians have not seen there pts again becasue they set it up to where it was power deal instead of a concern for the pts safety.
The gfriends deal was a little I dont know. Its like mixed, in all sorts of ways each of them were acknowledging an emerging awareness, while not taking any action. Its not like encouraging someone to see a therapist is like a torture or punishment.
In an educated setting,(dad)the "hestancy " to make one appt seems a bit confusing IMO. Its not locking someone up - its 45 minutes! If anything dad could have gotten some feedback himself about his concerns.
Somewhat confused about the daughter bringing him back, I was pretty sure that mom actually said SHE bought him back, but maybe I confused that.
Did not know what to make of the he had been histching rides the last couple of weeks and/or someone may have drove him to the victims house - that makes no sense, why would some stranger drive him to a wrong house?
DOnt think in this day and age anyone would be fine with their kid at any age supposedly hitchiking like the 70's, I dont know!!
DOnt rememver, --anyone off hand remember if the boating video was about the time frame dad said -- a "couple" of weeks ago?? I thought further back but not sure.
In a strange way it did put stuff into "order" if that is possible in this.
It also made me ponder if he did actually drink the substance (same as Wesson) just thirst, way before he got there on his walk home, and by the time he got there the stuff was really kicking in. I would think drinking some gasoline or something might kinda make you , after dehydrating, tension with dad, fatigue, not sleeping can all by themselves result in psycotic break.
I am not medical but in some fashion if throat and lungs are burning it makes some sense that I might grunt growl whatever , in an effort to "clear" it. Some coughs can sound like that! My bet would be lungs are not doing a "good" job of getting oxygen so just relfex wise it might result in louder efforts to grasp some air moo
Most of us agree that in the duffy video he looked way skinny - so we might conclude that he was not eating normatively either. In a bizaire way that kinda can fit into putting the cheese in it at least he is getting something to eat. You know moms and food etcetc.
no matter if we ever get any answer, whatever the options I do not think he will remember - if just on the notion of denial. The kid has some , if he returns to cognitive functioning, a heap of info to comprehend - that in itself could result in compelling denial in order to survive. just in and of itself.
Some of the info seems "checkable". They could ask his pts if any of them encountered him (Austin) at wades office and he was behaving oddly, just in terms of checking out some of dads info.
Dads reporting that he had on three occasions just left, fits for me. They can get focused on something and lose context that he was just at the table with dad eating, some thought starts in his head and he has to go .
It also explains the lack of instant action on their part. If it happened before and he retuerned home safe and sound it could explain the time lapse before mom called 911- nothing bad happened before. On the same hand it would have been interesting to know how long he "vansihed " the first times .
I am glad he is doing another one (interview) - it would be interesting to see what or how things have changed in terms of whatever he reports tongiht with the passage of time, and lots of hanging out with attornies!
If it has not aired if someone knows a was to capture it to post here that would be great - pondering if there is a delay before it gets "findable" on google
gonna try to look in a minute but shockwave player is being a bad boy right now and getting ready for a time out!!!
Obvioulsy all specualtion at the end of the day, the interview resulted in my having mcuh more compassion for dad, I expected him to be more lawyerey, the time he took to respond to his questions was rapid fire, appearing , at least to me, that he was not going back to rehearsed stuff.
IMO, his teary outbursts also felt as if they occurred in a context wherein dad was having a fond memory of his son, spewed when he verbilized guilt, etc etc- IMO thier onset was congruent with the dialog.
As far as PHil goes hated him colleague wise from day one- way to confontationial and absorbed with "being" right endlessly. Did not feel like a clinical interaction at all, felt like a male Operah (cant stand her) - no wonder she made "him"!
Never have seen his show before and based on the teases tongiht it sure seems like all his shows now are like that Muary Povatch guy years ago- dealing with people and stories that are tabloid at best - voyer audiences Tommorow Dr Phil talks with the man who ate rats for the last 6 years, of next week Dr Phil talks with woman who set both her hands on fire - just tabloid junk.
Look at the title of this one - give me a break -thats about getting viewers, bigger ad rates, and a better salary - thats not a clinican whose motivation is to fascilatate another human find a way that they can make their lives easier or better or less of a struggle - he is a capitlist money hungry exploiting people for his own finanical gain, his therupetic style to any client with any issue is to confront the hell out of anyone.
Think about it , has anyone ever found being confronted helpful resulting in change. If anything it requres the person being confronted having to defend themselves and or come reason with "why" they are doing "that" - so actually it is reinforcing the "reasons" - and verbilize it.
Stop speeding. I like speeding - it just reinforced it - reminding the person that they enjoy driving fast!!!
ANyone ever, really confronted someone so often and intensly that it resulted i extinction of the behavior?? Negative reinforcement does has rewards.
moo