FL FL - Michelle Parker, 33, Orlando, 17 Nov 2011 - #19

[FrayedKnot]

The court can't factor in the use of your BF's car in with child support.

Yes, they certainly can and do.

In my own divorce, I accepted a lesser amount of monthly support than I would have been entitled to because I kept my vehicle and my ex made the payments and covered insurance. When the vehicle is paid off, the title transfers to me.

So, you're wrong. Child support is often adjusted to reflect things like that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Jazzmaster]

Yeah. Josh Powell had custody of his and Susan's boys and we see how that turned out. He was a real great dad.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What a great point! I sure hope this case doesn't turn into another Josh Powell
in many ways. They still haven't found Susan and obviously what happened with the kids. I pray every day for the twinners safety.

 

[telemag]

Yes, they certainly can and do.

In my own divorce, I accepted a lesser amount of monthly support than I would have been entitled to because I kept my vehicle and my ex made the payments and covered insurance. When the vehicle is paid off, the title transfers to me.

So, you're wrong. Child support is often adjusted to reflect things like that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They weren't married!!!

 

[Jazzmaster]

Poor misunderstood Dale. IMO reputation is a priceless thing. His life choices are coming back to bite him...He still has time to rebuild his reputation. He just needs to come forward, tell the truth, and work to clear his name. JMO

 

[Jazzmaster]

With all this circumstantial evidence why no body? Who's to say I have or haven't talked to him about this? I have said it before NOTHING he and I talk about would go on a public forum such as this. Especially now after that I have seen how things get turned around. If I was told something that I thought was of value I'd report it.

Thank you! Just was trying to think outside the box here to help find Michelle. I guess we agree to disagree on who was involved. As far as circumstantial evidence and no body? There are thousands of cases with PLENTY of circumstantial evidence and no body. Powell is just one of many examples...

 

[FrayedKnot]

They weren't married!!!

Doesn't matter. This was our child support agreement, not our divorce decree. It was just done at the same time which is why I mentioned it that way.

You do not have to be married to be eligible to receive child support. Did you really not know that?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Jersey*Girl]

Poor misunderstood Dale. IMO reputation is a priceless thing. His life choices are coming back to bite him...He still has time to rebuild his reputation. He just needs to come forward, tell the truth, and work to clear his name. JMO

This is exactly how I think. Plus these rumors won't go away until Michelle is found, even after if he does end up being the perp. When people do bad things, especially getting in trouble legally, the info & bad name will be there forever. My Nona always taught me that for every not so nice thing you do in life that you'll have to do at least 5 nice things to make it better, including owning up to your mistakes.

 

[telemag]

Doesn't matter. This was our child support agreement, not our divorce decree. It was just done at the same time which is why I mentioned it that way.

You do not have to be married to be eligible to receive child support. Did you really not know that?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

<Mod Snip> I am not talking about child support. I judge has no legal right to grant an ex girlfriend use of her exboyfriends vehicle.

 

[imamaze]

We are a victim friendly forum, please remember that when discussing Michelle.

If you think a post is against TOS please alert, and the Mods can check it out.

:tyou:

 

[Kimster]

I've rec'd some questions about attacking the victim and closed the thread before anyone got more frustrated.

We can point out things that aren't perfect about the victim's decisions. Asking why Michelle lived where she lived and yet had extravagances is not bashing her. It might even bring up a clue somehow. I watched the show they were on and I saw two people who made some mistakes, just like all the other imperfect people I know including myself. Did anything she owned or where she lived say she deserved to disappear? Perish the thought! But perhaps something in there will raise an idea in one of you to help put this together.

Michelle needs to be found. Her children need her. Her family needs answers. And whoever may have harmed her needs to be brought to justice.

And please, you can question how she could afford something, but going on to say it was acquired via illegal purposes is going way over the line.

 

[Kimster]

He is a deadbeat. And too busy bashing Michelle online to feed or bathe his kids.

Has there been something reported saying he is not bathing or feeding the kids, or is this your personal opinion?

 

[Jersey*Girl]

Hi Kimster. You edited a post of mine informing this:
Last edited by Kimster; Today at 09:42 AM. Reason: removed portion criticizing victim's parenting skills. Please link to fact she was a bad parent

I never said Michelle is a bad parent, not at all, I don't even want to imply that. I personally don't even think that. I think she did the best she could with what she knew how. The problem I keep coming back to is that they both, Michelle AND Dale, kept going back to each other even though they fought and/or argued constantly. Both worked , Michelle had 3 jobs. So, when did the kids spend time with their parents? How many hours? Then, in the what seems like little precious time they'd all have together, the kids were subjected to fighting & arguing. That doesn't say Michelle's a bad mom, to me it says this is a life she was used to. That's scary. I still wonder about the bars. I still think she was scouted. Maybe it's Dale but what about if it isn't? If the perp isn't Dale, then somebody is out there & is eluding law enforcent bc all eyes are on Dale. What I'm saying is that if the perp isn't Dale, then the perp that took Michelle knew her habits & itinerary and took her when they knew she wouldn't have her kids.

Subsequently, if anyone should read this post, please know that I don't try to take sides when I post, no matter how the media slants things. Sure Josh Powell was horrible & despicable and a lot of us compare these two cases. However a very good example would be to check out Samantha Koenig's threads where a restraining order/rape case was set to go to court against a guy she was acquainted with so media slanted it that way, everybody became obsessed with this dude being the perp, but he in fact isn't the perp. He & his family received death threats bc of the accusations against him. If Dale isn't the perp, I sure hope he's not getting death threats most especially with those little children living with him.

 

[Jazzmaster]

Has there been something reported saying he is not bathing or feeding the kids, or is this your personal opinion?

I know I remember reading a story on the Palm Beach post stating "Michelle Parker: DCF investigation into missing mom's children ends · The last time Stewart said she saw the twins they were dirty" cannot for the life of me find the link but know it was reported on MSM.

 

[What'sThatClue]

Has there been something reported saying he is not bathing or feeding the kids, or is this your personal opinion?

JMO that comes from the statements by Michelle Parker's mother as reported in MSM. Don't know about the feeding (maybe that was a JMO by the poster) but it has been commented they were dirty when he took the twins for visitation.

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com...t-lake-20120201_1_dive-team-search-ends-clues

The last time Stewart said she saw the twins they were dirty, but otherwise in good health.

And also posted here, a good portion of the same article:

Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - FL FL - Michelle Parker, 33, Orlando, 17 Nov 2011 - #19

 

[telemag]

I've rec'd some questions about attacking the victim and closed the thread before anyone got more frustrated.

We can point out things that aren't perfect about the victim's decisions. Asking why Michelle lived where she lived and yet had extravagances is not bashing her. It might even bring up a clue somehow. I watched the show they were on and I saw two people who made some mistakes, just like all the other imperfect people I know including myself. Did anything she owned or where she lived say she deserved to disappear? Perish the thought! But perhaps something in there will raise an idea in one of you to help put this together.

Michelle needs to be found. Her children need her. Her family needs answers. And whoever may have harmed her needs to be brought to justice.

And please, you can question how she could afford something, but going on to say it was acquired via illegal purposes is going way over the line.

Thanks Kimster, I have no ax to grind with Michelle's lifstyle be it what ever it was. It's hard to sleuth this case and not bring up certain things that I feel Michelle has done that could have opened her up to risk. She did seem like a girl who lived a higher lifestyle than what she could afford. I have never suggested that anything that she owned made her deserving of what has happened, not that you were speaking to me, but anyone who would suggest that is being vicious and it is not relevant to the issues.

Michelle was a pretty girl who made herself highly visibile. She posted lots of pics of herself on Facebook (I desprise FB and think is responsible for many abductions) She also drove around in a hummer with her phone number on it. How many guys do you think noticed her? If I was a young single guy I would probably take the number down just to get to know her. She also worked at a bar. Nothing wrong with that, my point is again that she probably got hit on many times by God knows who. Why do people go to bars? Not the safest place IMO for a pretty girl to work. Based on these few things I have mentioned and more I believe it quite possible that there is someone else involved in Michelle's disappearance.

 

[hon3yb33]

I looked this up today...there are three orders of delinqent support 03/2010, 05/2010 and 05/2011 not one error. I guess he really is a deadbeat dad...JMO. I remember reading somewhere too that YS said the kids looked dirty and malnourished since Dale has had custody...

Does anyone know if Dale is still using drugs? With dad manufacturing who knows? I sure hope he's trying to get clean and sober for the sake of the children's safety.

BBM
It did not say they were malnourished and yes maybe they were dirty but it could have been that they had been playing outside and did not have time to get cleaned up. My children get dirty does that mean I am a deadbeat mother?

 

[Jazzmaster]

Ok let's for a second say some random stalker grabbed Michelle. Her last know text in line with her character was just before dropping off the twinners then no other texts until the IMO bogus "Waterford" text. So the stalker knew she told Dale she was going shopping so he wanted to frame Dale? How come no one other than Dale said Michelle planned to go shopping that day? How come no witnesses saw Michelle after she arrived at Dales? Still his lie that she arrived at 4pm keeps coming back to me...The random perp idea to me just has no foundation. She was in a gated area. I just don't see it.

 

[telemag]

So a random stranger did this and left a cookie trail of circumstantial evidence all leading back to Dale? How convenient! But wait you may be correct. Didn't Michelle meet Dale at one of those bars? IMO he would definitely be in the "less than desirable people" category as you have described...

I don't think it a random stranger. So Michelle met Dale at a bar? I don't think I ever knew how they met. Do you think that Dale is the only less than desirable person that Michelle has ever met in a bar?

 

[hon3yb33]

Ok let's for a second say some random stalker grabbed Michelle. Her last know text in line with her character was just before dropping off the twinners then no other texts until the IMO bogus "Waterford" text. So the stalker knew she told Dale she was going shopping so he wanted to frame Dale? How come no one other than Dale said Michelle planned to go shopping that day? How come no witnesses saw Michelle after she arrived at Dales? Still his lie that she arrived at 4pm keeps coming back to me...The random perp idea to me just has no foundation. She was in a gated area. I just don't see it.

BBM
Didn't one of the posters from here get into this gated area and took pictures of Dale's house? I wonder how hard it was for her to get into this gated area.

 

[telemag]

Ok let's for a second say some random stalker grabbed Michelle. Her last know text in line with her character was just before dropping off the twinners then no other texts until the IMO bogus "Waterford" text. So the stalker knew she told Dale she was going shopping so he wanted to frame Dale? How come no one other than Dale said Michelle planned to go shopping that day? How come no witnesses saw Michelle after she arrived at Dales? Still his lie that she arrived at 4pm keeps coming back to me...The random perp idea to me just has no foundation. She was in a gated area. I just don't see it.

How come no one saw Dale put Michelle's body in the Hummer and drive away with it? How come no one saw Dale at all anywhere? Does this make Dale innocent? No, but how did he do all he was supposed to have done and not leave one clue??