Thor
New Member
- Joined
- May 24, 2012
- Messages
- 893
- Reaction score
- 0
IMO There is absolutely no value in bringing up the kids in the context of finding Michelle. The kids have absolutely no probative value insofar that they are truly innocent and therefore IMO should not be brought into this tragedy to the degree possible. I certainly would not want my child's welfare to be a public discussion where any stranger is entitled to an "opinion", there's simply no point to that IMO, it benefits no one and especially not these children. That concept is called privacy, not for the father but for the kids, and I'd be pressed to come up with a single child psychologist, or any child advocate that would find any of these having any relationship whatsoever to truly caring for these children. To then even bringing up the kids in the context of attacking their own father, not to mention the various name calling is something that I can't understand in the context of these poor children not to mention the value of it all. This is only my opinion and I've been wrong before.
Now, just to be clear, there is a very serious and definitive reason why those kids are in their father's custody, and that is because a court having reviewed the facts has found that there are no evidence, conclusive or otherwise, that this father abused these kids or that he's likely to abused them in the future, and that he's capable of parenting his children, and that can be changed only by contradicting facts having factual significance within that legal framework, and not by personal opinions, since any person is assumed to be innocent until proven guilty of something, and that is called "due process", which is not just a legal term per se existing in a vacuum, but the very foundation of that same freedom all or most of us hold so dear, which in this case is exemplified by the freedom of this father (Dale Smith) to parent his own children having been found guilty of nothing that effect both his rights and his capability to raise his children.
Dale Smith will parent his children whether we like it or not, and he will walk free whether we like it or not, until and unless evidence and juries will change that straightforward proposition, and I thought the whole idea was to find those clues and those facts to prove our opinions instead of simply making up slogans that are an end to their own, it's been a while I've come to the conclusion that perhaps I thought wrong.
Now, just to be clear, there is a very serious and definitive reason why those kids are in their father's custody, and that is because a court having reviewed the facts has found that there are no evidence, conclusive or otherwise, that this father abused these kids or that he's likely to abused them in the future, and that he's capable of parenting his children, and that can be changed only by contradicting facts having factual significance within that legal framework, and not by personal opinions, since any person is assumed to be innocent until proven guilty of something, and that is called "due process", which is not just a legal term per se existing in a vacuum, but the very foundation of that same freedom all or most of us hold so dear, which in this case is exemplified by the freedom of this father (Dale Smith) to parent his own children having been found guilty of nothing that effect both his rights and his capability to raise his children.
Dale Smith will parent his children whether we like it or not, and he will walk free whether we like it or not, until and unless evidence and juries will change that straightforward proposition, and I thought the whole idea was to find those clues and those facts to prove our opinions instead of simply making up slogans that are an end to their own, it's been a while I've come to the conclusion that perhaps I thought wrong.