Or, because the person responsible was already in the vehicle in the past so his hair/dna etc. would not be out of place?
Yes, of course, that's a real possibility, I agree there.
Or, because the person responsible was already in the vehicle in the past so his hair/dna etc. would not be out of place?
So, how far is Walden Circle from the intersection of Vineland and Conroy? Never mind. I see that it seems to be less than a mile.
Yes and I think it would be reasonable to think that the perp is in the process of ditching the H3 at that point since the vehicle is recovered nearby a bit more then an hour later, which would indicate that perhaps the perp is driving around looking for a discreet location to abandon the H3 .... but ...
... But ... what I cannot figure out is how it is then that the H3 is found clean? Clean as in no evidence identifying a suspect or a person that can be connected to the events in a direct physical sense ... is the perp wearing gloves? An uniform to be thrown in a washing machine or discarded altogether after the fact? What about soil samples stuck to the sole of the shoes? Or were the shoes covered as well, a couple of shopping bags tightened around the ankle? That's a lot of planning involved there, expertise ... premeditation, was Michelle the victim of circumstances or an intended target? Was she an intended target of opportunity, or an opportunity that made her a target? And I'm not asking that to hear yet another of the million and one theories that have floated around here over and over again, (speaking solely for myself) but that one real theory of the crime built on solid evidence, in other words, the kind that prosecutions and arrests are made of.
Yes, of course, that's a real possibility, I agree there.
I agree and that was my point...I don't think she was in the Hummer going to Waterford at that time. I think it was a setup by someone else which leads me to believe that whatever happened...had already taken place, which would narrow the timeline even further. It would make no sense for her to have driven in that direction to get to Waterford.
The Waterford text is at perhaps at 4:26pm since there's no certainty of where and when it actually happened, the H3 is captured at 8:55 pm and the two need not to be connected in terms of who's driving the H3, it's the removed decals the tell the story of who's in charge of the vehicle at that crucial time.
Wasn't DS dating Michelle when she had the Hummer or had the two of them rode together to do something regarding the twins? If there was a joint situation (doctor's etc.) I would imagine they would have taken her vehicle with the car seats and all already set up. Just a thought on why no "foreign" materials would be in the vehicle.
The Waterford text is at perhaps at 4:26pm since there's no certainty of where and when it actually happened, the H3 is captured at 8:55 pm and the two need not to be connected in terms of who's driving the H3, it's the removed decals the tell the story of who's in charge of the vehicle at that crucial time.
Wasn't DS dating Michelle when she had the Hummer or had the two of them rode together to do something regarding the twins? If there was a joint situation (doctor's etc.) I would imagine they would have taken her vehicle with the car seats and all already set up. Just a thought on why no "foreign" materials would be in the vehicle.
Yes, by why then no one has been named a suspect other then DS? Probably because the 2nd perp (assuming the police theory correct) is unknown.
JMO
Well, the way I see it is this: Lauren, Michelle's sister, says Michelle was at the condo at 4:00 pm NOT 3:18. Her brother's phone got a text at 4:26 pm (unusual one word text according to her family) saying Waterford but actually not far from DS condo. It seems apparent the text isn't real, since Michelle was no where near Waterford at the time AND the phone pinged from an area that made NO sense for Michelle to be driving in (either to go home or to Waterford). So, the timeline for whatever happened to Michelle, IMO, now would be narrowed drastically to 4:00 arrives at condo, DS says she stays about 15 minutes (4:15) then 11 minutes later is the ping from Hoffner and Semoran (8-10 minutes away) that seems to be a "decoy" according to her family. All JMO
How long has LE had this video? And if they have had it for a while, why on earth would they wait? Tends of thousands of people have probably moved out of the area over two years, who will never see it now or remember anything, even if they do. JMO
The Waterford text is at perhaps at 4:26pm since there's no certainty of where and when it actually happened, the H3 is captured at 8:55 pm and the two need not to be connected in terms of who's driving the H3, it's the removed decals the tell the story of who's in charge of the vehicle at that crucial time.
I agree and that was my point...I don't think she was in the Hummer going to Waterford at that time. I think it was a setup by someone else which leads me to believe that whatever happened...had already taken place, which would narrow the timeline even further. It would make no sense for her to have driven in that direction to get to Waterford.
Michelle's sister was apparently told by DSJr that Michelle arrived at the condo at 4pm. A surveillance video from the neighbour's camera showed that she actually arrived at 3:18pm.
The timeline starts then. Although DSJr apparently wanted the family to think it was 42 minutes later for some reason.
MOO
I agree so much with that!!!! I've been calling and calling and calling for them to release evidence ... to make public appeals by giving more detailed information .... "... the integrity of the investigations ...." really? No really???? What investigation? Are they referring to the investigation that has produced no Michelle being found and no arrests two years into it or the other mythical investigation where they "know" stuff, and are diligently pursuing the case, as in right out of a classic PR press release? And where were the actual investigators at today's media event? Why is it that an officer not directly connected to the investigation was answering the grand total of 3 questions or so most of which went like .... hum ... I'm not aware of this or that? Than why was it there to begin with? To preserve the integrity of the projector?
Or maybe they want the second person to feel safe enough to talk to police.
At one point there was something about the camera not having the right time setup. Was that disproved?