- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
- Messages
- 28,757
- Reaction score
- 11,540
I'm interested in O'Cain also
This case being in the infant stage certianly has a lot of kwinky dinks, and crypitc messages, for a reason. (in my opinion only)
Does LE assign certain people to watch online internet activity? I think they do, and I think they watch crime forums as well. AND I know families and perps also watch. example: Anthony's pages of WS posts in the garbage from the lady that retrieved their trash.
Do you happen to recall the topic and direction the sleuthing was going prior to the cryptic message? I am wanting to say that was thread #8... is that what you recall? I am so trying to work today and my memory is failing with all this other stuff going on.
Hey - I may be late on this but I know he/she posted on thread #7 pg.11 #256 and on thread 9 # 230. I hope this helps. I made a note of this because the first one really gave me the creeps.
I was thinking the same, trying to get everyone to go in another direction.
It's common. Most serials admit to questioning any religion they may have had about the time of their first or first few murders. Also, killers may hint to clergy about what they have done and then feel the need to get away from the person they hinted or confessed to.I'm very interested in the portion of the profile saying the person may have changed religions recently.
Anyone have any insight on that?
This case being in the infant stage certianly has a lot of kwinky dinks, and crypitc messages, for a reason. (in my opinion only)
Does LE assign certain people to watch online internet activity? I think they do, and I think they watch crime forums as well. AND I know families and perps also watch. example: Anthony's pages of WS posts in the garbage from the lady that retrieved their trash.
Do you happen to recall the topic and direction the sleuthing was going prior to the cryptic message? I am wanting to say that was thread #8... is that what you recall? I am so trying to work today and my memory is failing with all this other stuff going on.
Hey - I may be late on this but I know he/she posted on thread #7 pg.11 #256 and on thread 9 # 230. I hope this helps. I made a note of this because the first one really gave me the creeps.
I was thinking the same, trying to get everyone to go in another direction.
That poster posted later to clarify. Was on for quite awhile yesterday, lots of posts last thread.
ETA: Somewhere along the line the quote got broke. My sincere apologies.
I'm very interested in the portion of the profile saying the person may have changed religions recently.
Anyone have any insight on that?
Insightful post Chili Fries. Brings up some questions for me...
1. Doesn't make sense that he would put Sommer in a local trash dumpster if he was in a car. Why not just keep on going? Were there roadblocks up that quick?
2. Where would he take a car that was safer than driving away?
3. Could he have tossed Somer in his trunk? If so, maybe forensics can retrieve carpet fibers that would lead to the car.
4. Was the car parked in a driveway - or beside a house - so it wouldn't look out of place when grabbing or luring Somer?
5. You suggest - expired tags..is it safer to stay in the local neighborhood with expired tags or get out of the town?
6. The abduction happened to quick, I can't help but think the perp knew exactly where he was taking her - seems to me he had a place to go and knew he wouldn't look out of place.
so far, nobody remembers seeing anything! This car stuff has me confused!!! help! :banghead:
It's common. Most serials admit to questioning any religion they may have had about the time of their first or first few murders. Also, killers may hint to clergy about what they have done and then feel the need to get away from the person they hinted or confessed to.
Father is on now
He says shock and now setting in a heavy loss.......
harder every minute
Focus on catching guy
LE not saying much........evidence under wraps
He can't think about ALL the horrible things his daughter's killer did
Someone close to family?
Close to neighborhood......neighbor
Great article, thank you for posting.
A few quick, important (imo) excerpts, with my comments in purple:
Sheriff Rick Beseler says...
* he "believes the person or persons responsible for killing 7 year old Somer Thompson is watching the investigation closely".
* he called it a "heinous crime".
* he called it a "child abduction murder case".
Those 3 statements above put to rest any notion it could be a hit-and-run, or anything other than what he clearly states.
The Sheriff also states...
* "The fact that we found Somer's body so quickly, I'm sure it's unnerved the person responsible".
I am personally reassured and comforted by the Sheriff referring to "Somer's" body, instead of "the" body, as I have seen in too many investigations. He is treating Somer with the respect she deserves. So often, investigators talk about the deceased as objects, calling bodies "it", etc.
Regarding the location of the killer, he says...
* "He may not be right here in Orange Park, but they're still out there".
a poly wouldn't clear them... dna would and it is not back yet.