Sorry to back track...it's just I wish we could figure this out conclusively, but not sure it can be.
Detectives spotted the legs first and found the body partially covered by garbage
Wednesday in a Georgia landfill, after investigators followed garbage trucks leaving the neighborhood where the child disappeared Monday. http://www.app.com/article/20091022...es--birthmark-helped-ID-Somer-Thompson-s-body
"The body appears to be a of a small child. No positive ID at this time, the body was partially covered. All we could see were the lower extremities," said Clay County Sheriff Rick Beseler. http://www.wflx.com/Global/story.asp?S=11357780
Now this (video) press conference was in the evening or maybe before day break. About 25 seconds in, Beseler says ” … along with some clothing items the child was wearing.” It does sound as if she was fully dressed, but you could still take it the other way. If they could only see the lower extremities & if she was not wearing pants, they wouldn’t know if this was a boy or a girl at that age (which they said could be a boy or girl. Darn, this is a big piece of the puzzle. If this is not a sex crime wouldn’t that narrow down the field considerably? I am thinking of who or how many people would have a motive then to kill a 7 year old? Once the labs come back…I wouldn’t think it should be too difficult for them to prove KWIM?
Detectives spotted the legs first and found the body partially covered by garbage
Wednesday in a Georgia landfill, after investigators followed garbage trucks leaving the neighborhood where the child disappeared Monday. http://www.app.com/article/20091022...es--birthmark-helped-ID-Somer-Thompson-s-body
"The body appears to be a of a small child. No positive ID at this time, the body was partially covered. All we could see were the lower extremities," said Clay County Sheriff Rick Beseler. http://www.wflx.com/Global/story.asp?S=11357780
Now this (video) press conference was in the evening or maybe before day break. About 25 seconds in, Beseler says ” … along with some clothing items the child was wearing.” It does sound as if she was fully dressed, but you could still take it the other way. If they could only see the lower extremities & if she was not wearing pants, they wouldn’t know if this was a boy or a girl at that age (which they said could be a boy or girl. Darn, this is a big piece of the puzzle. If this is not a sex crime wouldn’t that narrow down the field considerably? I am thinking of who or how many people would have a motive then to kill a 7 year old? Once the labs come back…I wouldn’t think it should be too difficult for them to prove KWIM?