- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Messages
- 16,167
- Reaction score
- 57,782
It should be mandatory they lose their frank and beans immediately after they're convicted.
That or a bullet between the eyes.
It should be mandatory they lose their frank and beans immediately after they're convicted.
There's nothing uncomfortable about JH behind bars for child porn - rightfully so!
What's UNCOMFORTABLE is the idea that he could be a scapegoat for Somer's murder.
Just to be clear: Scapegoating is the practice of singling out one child, employee or member of a group of peers for unmerited negative treatment or blame for something they did not do. Related concepts include frameup, whipping boy and fall guy.
I'm waiting for the FACTS to be presented before I get comfortable...
Yeah, that poor guy. They even ran over his foot. Tim Masters in CO just won a judgment for millions, too. But this is also proving my point that people can be falsely accused. I wonder why they announced his being a POI to the media at all? Why not just wait until they've arrested him for murder?Steven Jay Hatfill (born October 24, 1953) is an American physician, virologist and bio-weapons expert. The US Department of Justice identified the former government scientist as a "person of interest" in its investigation of the 2001 anthrax attacks. FBI raids on his home were well-attended by journalists and, consequently, several news outlets speculated that Hatfill was at one time the likely suspect for the attacks. He later sued the government for ruining his reputation, a case which the government settled for US$5.8 million.[1] Investigators later announced that the anthrax attacks had been carried out by another government scientist, Bruce Edwards Ivins, who they concluded had acted alone.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Hatfill
I feel far more comfortable thinking they got the right guy for the murder of Somer and he will be charged then I have felt about anyone that has been researched or discussed to this date.
I do admit my prejudice on it though, I figured it would be someone just like this guy. I even thought a shed might be involved.
That or a bullet between the eyes.
It would make sense why LE was able to clear the RSO's so quickly back in the beginning
Or in the middle of the eye
He had no criminal record.
The pornography was found in August.
Somer was abducted and murdered in October.
He was allowed to abscond to Mississippi.
That indicates that he was not a person of interest.
Or in the middle of the eye
AS IN ol' one eye chee?
Well, voluntarily or not, he will surely be swabbed once he is brought back to the county to answer for the porn charges.
IMO
In the most recent "Nightline" interview, the reporter was talking about how Somer, as had been reported, ran off from her sister following an argument. The reporter said:
"Do you think it was rare that she would have broken off like that?"
The response was: ""...completely, COMPLETELY rare. I don't know anything about it if (they've) done that."
Does anybody think that ___________ (J.H.), having been seen smoking cigarettes outside when the children walked home from school, would have seen Somer running off other times, or do you think it was an unusual incident?
Yeah, that poor guy. They even ran over his foot. Tim Masters in CO just won a judgment for millions, too. But this is also proving my point that people can be falsely accused. I wonder why they announced his being a POI to the media at all? Why not just wait until they've arrested him for murder?
Outside & possibly close to the last known whereabouts of Somer around the time children were walking home from school on the afternoon of October 19th - so say about 3ish?
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
:waitasec:
ETA: could have been like a bird on a wire.