For those who agree with the verdict...help me understand.

[beccalecca1]

It all goes back to the 911 call - a claim of drowning makes no sense at all. Why call the police into it. How would CA and GA ever think that call would clear any of them if it was an accident. What nonsense!

I don't recall GA calling the police at all, except when he was missing gas cans.

 

[Kimberlyd125]

The tape remained in place because it was adhered to the hair of the skull.



would not be expected to find the mandible in this position unless something affixed the mandible in this position prior to decomposition and the hair matting forming

 

[Kimberlyd125]

I do believe that Cindy had no clue of anything in the beginning. I'm not believing George though. I think he had a huge part in all of this. And, if CA didn't know how she died (or that she died at all), there wouldn't be a reason to take the pool down. If GA all of a sudden came up to CA and said, let's take the pool down, CA would probably question why.

IMO

Oh yeah. Evil George.

I forget.

:crazy:

 

[beccalecca1]

She won't have to worry about sitting around her parents home anymore!


http://abcnews.go.com/US/casey-antho...ry?id=14080086

Casey Anthony's Father Says She's Not Welcome to Come Home

Casey Anthony's father has made it clear that she is not welcome to come home when she gets out of jail on Sunday following her acquittal for the death of her daughter Caylee, sources close to the case told ABC News.

In another shot at his daughter, George Anthony is also encouraging people to sign a petition for Caylee's Law, which would make it a crime for parents to not report that their children are missing.

Interesting statement by GA after Casey has been clearly denying visits from her parents for about 2 years. I would have to say that it's clear that she's not interested in going home, but of course GA can't make himself look bad, he has to say "Well, she's not welcome here anyways."

 

[beccalecca1]

Okie Dokie

It says covering, NOT adhered, which it clearly states in the next sentence. Covering, would equate to laying over. Not adhering, sticking to, or any other synonym you'd like to use.

 

[Smelly Squirrel]

Ok. I'm not a 'magical thinker' though. If there was evidence of murder, why would I be here arguing the opposite?

I can't answer that without being censored.

 

[beccalecca1]

There was initially a plea on the table early in the case. Once the remains were found, all hope of a plea was gone. And how or why would JB want her to take a plea when he'd just been paid =$200,000 by ABC and had his face on every media outlet possible. The guy knew a cash cow opportunity when he saw one.

Wasn't there an investigation on this $200,000 and it was founded that actually the A's got the money, not JB?

 

[Kimberlyd125]

Interesting statement by GA after Casey has been clearly denying visits from her parents for about 2 years. I would have to say that it's clear that she's not interested in going home, but of course GA can't make himself look bad, he has to say "Well, she's not welcome here anyways."

Oh my gosh.

Casey has clearly been denying visits from her parents because she had no use for them anymore.
No need for money in jail.
No need for a babysitter for "snot head".

Why would she be welcomed?
She lied about his p*n*s in her mouth.
She lied about his grand baby being taken by the nanny.
She lied about working for 2 years.
She lied about everything!!!
She lived off of them, allowed them to raise her child, and threw them under the bus to save her arse.

He finally sees what she is. He wants no part of her.

 

[nursebeeme]

please oh please folks... remember that you can attack the post but do not attack the poster. thank you

 

[Kimberlyd125]

It says covering, NOT adhered, which it clearly states in the next sentence. Covering, would equate to laying over. Not adhering, sticking to, or any other synonym you'd like to use.

Because there was no more sticky left to the tape!
It was in the elements for 6 months.

It also clearly states the tape was attached at one point and that is what held the jaw bone to the skull.

 

[logicalgirl]

Exactly, I don't know what I could have been thinking.

And I can certainly see why the chloroform computer evidence didn't make any sense ESPECIALLY SINCE THERE NEVER WAS A SEARCH FOR CHLOROPHYL.

And I can see why Vass was so confusing and they couldn't understand his DRAWING with a peak of chloroform that looked like a mountain. I mean if they cannot understand the jury instructions, I can imagine the peaks would be quite difficult.

And why even take into account the FBI forensic scientist who said he found chloroform on the rug even after it had been sent to him in AN UNSEALED cardboard box (and chloroform is KNOWN TO DISSIPATE QUICKLY).

And then there being no DNA is quite the culprit also - EVEN THOUGH HEAT AND WATER ARE DNA'S ENEMIES. and Caylee was underwater for some four months or so. So I can understand the jury getting all this evidence confused. I mean Dr. Kenney Baden said there should have been DNA or skin tissue attached to the tape and he should know - he is only about 500 years old and his colleague Spitz, 506 years old, who BROKE THE SKULL.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, absolutely. Got it. Right.

And don't forget no smell of decomp in the trunk because one of the jurors said that - there was no proof, despite many many witnesses, expert or not, who testified otherwise....:banghead:

 

[beccalecca1]

Right, the tape could have been put on her hair to keep it nice and neat or the tape was put on the outside of the bag and then placed itself around the bottom of her mandible keeping it in place or the tape was just lying in the woods and found its way to the mandible. Gotta be one of those.

You're completely right. If the tape was placed there to keep the mandible in place, how was the mandible still in place if the tape wasn't sticking to it anymore?

 

[Kimberlyd125]

You're completely right. If the tape was placed there to keep the mandible in place, how was the mandible still in place if the tape wasn't sticking to it anymore?

It wasn't placed there TO keep the mandible in place.
It was placed there for other reasons obviously.
The mandible being in place was just a result of the tape being there.

 

[logicalgirl]

Oh my gosh.

Casey has clearly been denying visits from her parents because she had no use for them anymore.
No need for money in jail.
No need for a babysitter for "snot head".

Why would she be welcomed?
She lied about his p*n*s in her mouth.
She lied about his grand baby being taken by the nanny.
She lied about working for 2 years.
She lied about everything!!!
She lived off of them, allowed them to raise her child, and threw them under the bus to save her arse.

He finally sees what she is. He wants no part of her.

She actually accused him of being a pedophile..
And stole thousands of dollars from CA and hundreds from CA's parents...
And accused him of dumping Caylee's body in a swamp to rot.....

 

[beccalecca1]

The mandible was resting on the hair mat, which was held together by the tape. As the body decomposed the tape clung to the hair, the hair DROPPED arund the skull forming the mat. Per Ashton the tape was placed predecomposition and as the skin dissolved, the tape stayed with the hair. This magic tape that has a mind of its own and can hop from outside a bag to inside the bag and attach itself to hair surrounding a skull just because it wants to.

That is reasonable - i can see why a jury would not find the tape evidence. Especially if they have been sequestered and want to go hoooooome.

Who said anything about inside the bag, wasn't the skull found under the bag?

 

[Kimberlyd125]

Nothing about this case says accident at all.

Just games the DT played and a killer walking away.

 

[beccalecca1]

We do????
We know for a fact???

We must know more than the experts that examined the skull then.

We sure are smart WSers.

Come one Chablis, are you just gonna ignore the report?

The report doesn't state this for a fact. It states the author's opinion (Dr. G?).

 

[beccalecca1]

So all it takes is having a pool to support the theory that it was certainly plausible that she drowned in the pool.

Ok.

So everybody who wants to murder their child, dump them in the woods, who has a pool is golden.

NOT GUILTY by way of having a pool.

I get it.

Yes, because all I said that was entered into evidence was "Hey, the A's have a pool!"

 

[Leah0107]

This is a great article and I think it sums up the jury decision precisely.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/judge-h-lee-sarokin/casey-anthony-jury_b_898550.html

 

[beccalecca1]

Even though the tape was in the elements for 6 months.
Even though there was not much sticky (if any at all) on the tape in December 2008.

Why would it adhere itself to the hair and nothing else?