Ohiogirl...Sorry for duplicate tweet. I didn't know you were following both twitter accts. Thank you for informing all of us. I'll be in transit all day tomorrow (to an island off the coast of Brunswick). If anyone wants photos, I'll do my best to take what you want, as long as I am safe.
I'm giving up. No tweets for the last 40 mins. Have a good night all.
Interesking stuff. Yes, Lang's statements in this trial can be used against him, but I don't think they will be. Lang has a lot of lies. But are they relevant? H wasn't lying to protect the mother, he was lying to protect himself. But the general gist of his story, that Elkins shot the baby has been consistent. And it is the same as the Mother's. Ultimately i find Lang to be quite believable. I dont think the jury will have trouble seeing his perspective. Elkins will try to present different theories, but they can't all be true. And that is where his defense fails. In closing the prosecution will simply point out that there is only one theory that fits the facts: Elkins shot the kid. The rest is irrelevant. I believe Lang and the State when they say that there is no deal. Not written at least, but perhaps implied. That's why Elkins is on trial first.
If this Defense team comes hard at the grieving mother on the stand, it will backfire on them. No one is going to believe the mom shot her infant in the face. They will just look like desperate, callous goons, imo.
Ohiogirl...Sorry for duplicate tweet. I didn't know you were following both twitter accts. Thank you for informing all of us. I'll be in transit all day tomorrow (to an island off the coast of Brunswick). If anyone wants photos, I'll do my best to take what you want, as long as I am safe.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.