This case caught my attention when I saw on CTV that Gary Farris was the founder of Burr & Forman in Atlanta. Prior to my retirement, I was in RE Law and we had an office in Atlanta which means I had some involvement with that Atlanta firm.
I knew nothing about this case prior to watching on TV. At the end of the day, just seems there are still too many questions for me to vote guilty.
I keep wondering what MF meant when she told Rusty the body should not have been burned that badly. To me, that sounded like she had knowledge but not full knowledge and she is blaming someone else for burning the body, as if that was not agreed to beforehand. If not Scott, then who?