If there was evidence of a stolen election, it should have and would have (IMO) been presented during those sixty lawsuits adjudicated following the election. If not sooner.
I agree about his treating the democratic process as a PR campaign. The whole idea of a "Never-Trumper" implies that he thinks people should be loyal to him no matter what, whether he follows the law or not. D*mn straight I'm a "Never-Trumper" -- not as some schoolyard taunt -- but for substantive reasons. If I saw him show respect, empathy, and leadership, I would certainly reconsider. I mean, we know enough about psychology to know that won't happen, but if in some Hallmark movie world it did happen, yes I would respect that and reconsider.
I'm curious how it works in other states -- in California, where I was a precinct worker for ten years until covid, voters always have the option of a paper ballot or the machine.
I live in a heavily Republican area and whether for authentic mistrust or just an aversion to 'newfangled' stuff, can count on my fingers the number of times anyone in my precinct used the electronic voting machine instead of a paper ballot.
Long before Trump, folks were wary of the machines. If they are unreliable or erroneous in any way, that should of course (IMO) be addressed and fixed. The d wakesdorkarymocratic process is taken very seriously in the US and I have no doubt it would be/will be/has been addressed when problems arise. It sure looks to me like Trump merely glommed onto that as something to pretend was about him, when it truly has nothing to do with him. Same as absentee/mail-in ballots. IMO of course.
tldr: folks who want to vote using paper ballots should do so. Are there setups outside Californa that require the use of the machines?
