Can they still go after AS?
I'm not an atty, but I know there is no statute of limitations for murder, so I would assume yes. But I can't imagine something coming up in trial that LE doesn't already know?
Can they still go after AS?
Whoa! Andrea Sneiderman has been banned not only from the courtroom, but from the courthouse and any contact with all witnesses. The judge felt she was close to causing a mistrial.
9:05 a.m.: Judge Adams say that after a witness testified on Thursday, she was hugged by Andrea Sneiderman. Adams warns that this is improper. Geary asks that Andrea Sneiderman be barred from the courthouse. He says she greeted the witness outside the courtroom and hold her she was no longer her friend. She also entered a witness room against instructions, he says. Defense joins prosecution's request.
‎9:10 a.m. Judge Adams orders Andrea Sneiderman barred from courtroom and courthouse and orders her not to have any contact with witnesses.
Yeah, it's too bad GE emails are all deleted 30 days after they are put in the trash by the individual user. I was amazed a company like GE couldn't go further back and retrieve those emails. Would have been enlightening, IMO.:sigh:
We've followed other trials where emails and computer searches were retrieved even after they were deleted. I don't know the technical term but IIRC, it's very difficult to delete the history from the hard drive. Putting in the trash folder doesn't delete them from the hard drive.
There has to be a way to retrieve them. I'm surprised it hasn't been done.:waitasec:
http://www.ajc.com/news/dekalb/dunwoody-day-care-shooting-1361243.html
I love the chronological and detailed order of this blog. It's great if you can't watch testimony.
I wonder what 5 hour video the jury will be watching Monday. I assume it's the Hemy interview....
I'm concerned about this jury though. The Judge has had to tell them to be on time (ouch) and then:
"10:35 a.m.: Judge Adams interrupts testimony and tells
the jury to stand to ensure they "remain attentive."
I think this jury is ready with a verdict. He admits shooting the victim but it's not his fault. Barry White's Voice and Olivia Newton-John's Body Made Him Do It.
:innocent:
Olivia made me crack up. Very creative!
Seems like it would actually be an interesting case to be a juror - it's moving quickly, there's a "scandal" love affair, the widow gets banned.
At the end of the day, it's a sad situation though since 2 little kids are without a father and a family has lost their son/brother.
Holy cow! I'm watching the testimony being rerun and the ER doc who pronounced Rusty and informed AS of his death dropped a bomb. This guy has been doing this job for 27 years and says AS's lack of emotion was "very unusual to say the least."
Also, that AS's first response was to ask for a child psychologist to tell her kids that their father was dead.
:Eek:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Can I ask where you can watch the testimony in an archive? I've been glued to my iPad not wanting to leave the house, and I would love to be able to be more productive during the trial. :innocent:
Can I ask where you can watch the testimony in an archive? I've been glued to my iPad not wanting to leave the house, and I would love to be able to be more productive during the trial. :innocent:
I think people are over-focused on what AS's reactions to all this show. Consider: Let's assume that there was an affair. An unplanned, regrettable time of weakness, perhaps during a difficult time in her marriage, such as happens every single day to people who'd never have thought they would do such a thing. It is wrong, hurtful, deceptive...and it happens all the time.
What's different is the aftermath. Due to the defendant's subsequent actions, AS experienced not only the loss of her husband (the real victim here, but who, alas, is not participating in the aftermath under discussion here), but the loss of her job, her ability to have a job, many of her friends, her home, her community, and large parts of her family. She's had to deal with her children's loss of their father, the life they knew and their home. Her indiscretion, such as it was, has become known in the public sphere and in her private spheres.
The woman is dealing with a gut-wrenching, life-altering ejection from society and life that's simply unimaginable for most of us. Not to mention the guilt...even if she's not culpable, she has to feel responsible in some way.
But even if there was an affair, this outcome is not proportional to the transgression. I don't think there's a manual on how you're supposed to act about this. I don't think it's fair for us to assume that she shouldn't seem angry or she should cry more or she should ... whatever. She's been living this reality for a year, and I don't think most of us would come across as our best selves under those circumstances.
She made a mistake. And if it hadn't been with the "psycho" defendant, it would have been a personal and emotional crisis between her and her husband. Instead, it's...well...it is much much more.
<modsnip>
Out of lurkdom as this one was just too much for me not to address. I've been following this case since the first local news alert of Rusty's shooting on the morning of 11/18/10, and became very uncomfortable with the knowledge of AS's early retention of an attorney coupled with her deafening public silence for the 6 weeks between the murder and the arrest of HN. Being the Southerner that I am, I gave AS the benefit of the doubt and figured that she was working behind the scenes with the authorities...until the initial info about their relationship started trickling out in the weeks following the arrest. Then, and ONLY then, was there a brief written statement issued from AS expressing her "shock" at the arrest of HN who she referred to as a "famiy friend"...the smell factor really started that day, and has steadily grown over the months of further detailed info leading up to trial beginning last week, to reach a full-fledged and overwhelming stench. The stench was only magnified with the news last Fall that the Sneiderman family appeared to have broken all ties with AS, and their declining to address any mention of her name in a lengthy interview published in conjunction with the first anniversary of Rusty's death.
After seeing the absolute arrogance and narcicissm of AS during her own testimony, her reprehensible antics in the Courtroom/Courthouse, and witness after witness solidly impeaching her testimony on things that she should have had no reason to be lying about, I just have a sick feeling in the pit of my stomach. I'm at the point that not only do I think she was complicit in the murder, I now believe that she played HN like a violin to get exactly what she ultimately wanted...out of a marriage she no longer wanted to be in (ostensibly due to Rusty's repeated job losses - right, and I've got a bridge for sale), able to quickly go from well off ($800,000 in the bank pre-murder) to flat out wealthy with the speed she redeemed the $2,000,000 in Rusty's life insurance policies, using the perfect patsy to do the deed for her, which should have left her in what would have been a MOST sympathetic posture for all the world to pity.
My wise old Grandmother had a saying that I think particularly fits AS..."beauty is skin deep, but ugly goes all the way to the bone and the soul can't do anything to hide that ugliness". I have come to the conclusion that AS was not only complicit in Rusty's murder, I now firmly believe that she was fully involved in the planning, commission, and attempted cover-up of the crime. I now agree with many folks in the ATL area that feel she should be charged, and not just with perjury either! It would seem that she's already extended a good length of rope from her own mouth/attitude/actions, now all we can hope is that with the coming evidence adding to that length, that there will be enough for the proverbial noose for AS to have led to her own stint as a guest of the State of Georgia Department of Corrections for many, many years to come.
As always, the above is MOO.
Westie Mom
OHAI everyone! :seeya:
Catching up. The quality of the video is as bad as my ex's taste in clothes. Pffft.
I have awesome coffee, and am ready to roll!!! :great:
Is anybody watching the videotape of the police interrogation of HN this morning? HN was *very* deeply in debt...$440,000 on his house, plus student loans and $77,000 owed on his credit cards. His wife spent money very freely. The motive for the murder is sounding more and more, to me, in part, at least, like it was about collecting insurance proceeds, possibly. JMO