SnooperDuper
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 14, 2013
- Messages
- 7,676
- Reaction score
- 2,838
Just to add, the TB accolades are 193 words, achievements total 649 words - 30% of the space was devoted to the TB case. To me, that speaks volumes.
Well clearly derogatory is the wrong word to use when MK is being lauded for his achievements in the Bosma case.
Surely the case is the biggest of MK's career, and the case he would be known by, professionally.
I don't at all see how if could be a dishonour, or derogatory, for MK to be honoured for his work on the Bosma case.
This is after all a Governor General awarded medal - surely they don't give such a thing for mere involvement in high school sports.
Just to add, the TB accolades are 193 words, achievements total 649 words - 30% of the space was devoted to the TB case. To me, that speaks volumes.
Congratulations. You came up with about the same percentage as I did, only I didn't have to count the words.
It's clearly the correct word when the rest is ignored and belittled. It lessens the merit of everything else he has done throughout his career. I guess if you've never heard of the other cases, and you don't think being a positive influence and mentor to youth is important, or that teaching and sharing investigative techniques matter, then you may think that the only thing he would be honored for is his work on the TB case. But repeating it over and over again doesn't make it true.
I'm curious to learn more about the jury selection process ~ particularly when it comes to a high-profile case such as this one. I can't imagine how on earth it would be possible to find any local citizen who has not already formed an opinion regarding the guilt or innocence of the accused in this case. I suppose that I could be way off base in that thinking, given the fact that I spent a great deal of my time in this forum, particularly in the early months of the investigation. Any insight from our Legal Eagles here?
I really doubt that MK would have received this award if not for his work on the TB case, especially given the timing.
Again, I feel that the police work on this case was so thorough and so excellent that it had to be acclaimed.
^ watch the video in this one. Kavanaugh is being acclaimed in part due to his work on the TB case. Isn't it quite early to be handing out medals?
"Counsel, would you like to introduce me to your clients, please?" he asked immediately.
Smich, wearing a yellow and blue striped collared shirt, rose in one corner of the prisoners' box. In the other stood Millard, his most defining feature being the long, thin braid growing from behind his right ear, in contrast with his otherwise shorn hair.
http://www.thespec.com/opinion-stor...on-bosma-case-will-not-impact-trial-timeline/
If the Bosma disappearance had been treated like an ordinary missing persons case , and the truck like a normal auto theft , nobody would have been arrested and the whole thing would be a cold case today
Kavanagh deserves credit for for his instincts and leadership in this case. The eventual verdicts are beside the point. He did his part , and did it well.
Why was it not treated as an ordinary missing persons case and the truck like a normal auto theft? I thought it was a missing persons case and a truck theft, according to police and press. I am wondering what was done differently and more importantly IF it was done differently, WHY was it done differently.
I think the eventual verdicts are extremely important as far as Kavanaugh is concerned. Just as in the case of GP Morin etc, things are not always as portrayed. Unless someone already knows the outcome then I think praises for a case that has yet to be before the courts is extremely premature. JMO
Do you think Hamilton Police have arrested the wrong people ?
You have to remember that Project Capella was the largest investigation in HPS history
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/news/tim-bosma-investigator-awarded-medal-of-merit-1.3257702
Nominations for the medal MK received are received yearly. Surely it is the conclusion of the investigation that triggered MK's award.
Otherwise, it is a very nice medal for doing nothing. If it is all about high school football, why didn't Rob Ford get one too?
SC made an interesting point: the detectives on this case will be working the case full tilt right through the trial, investigating fully as any new information comes out. The investigation has never ended and will not end until the trial is over.
Except for the fact that the investigation is not concluded until the trial is over. Susan Clairmont mentioned this in her AM900 interview - it was actually you that pointed this out, a few pages back:
That's why it seems a little early to reward MK, but the Governor General's office would already be privy to the facts of the case and investigation. Just as the GG issued a DI because MK came up with solid evidence of a type the court likes, the GG came up with a reward based on that good work. They must have a damn good case.
The Attorney General issued the DI, the Governor General issued the award to MK. Two different people, two different jobs.
Why was it not treated as an ordinary missing persons case and the truck like a normal auto theft? I thought it was a missing persons case and a truck theft, according to police and press. I am wondering what was done differently and more importantly IF it was done differently, WHY was it done differently.
I think the eventual verdicts are extremely important as far as Kavanaugh is concerned. Just as in the case of GP Morin etc, things are not always as portrayed. Unless someone already knows the outcome then I think praises for a case that has yet to be before the courts is extremely premature. JMO