I agree with you. Imo, they dont have a very strong case against him from what we have heard to convict him for pre-med murder against Reeva.I think the state is wising up to the fact that with the evidence they have they shouldn't be going down the road that he was intentionally trying to kill Reeva, just that he was intentionally trying to kill anyone behind that door regardless.
It's hard to argue with that if you take that angle vs. trying to argue the specific 'he was targeting Reeva' angle.
I agree with you. Imo, they dont have a very strong case against him from what we have heard to convict him for pre-med murder against Reeva.
But maybe things change at trial....lol, I feel all doubtful if he will get bail tomorrow after been totally convinced yesterday and this morning that would...now...not sure!!
If you watched the video of the double amputee and how he walks, he uses his hands for balance. Portable fans can be long so he would have to push it.
LOL, and you wonder why the actual trial takes years, 4th day for bail application!
I was going to ask you yesterday how a trial could take years there, but I wonder no more lol!
I was impressed with Nel. IMO he proved intent and that is what he had to do. It does not matter who OP killed. He intended to kill someone. IMO Pistorius will not be released on baii as he could hamper or scamper.
16:38 - Phillip de Wet tweets: We don't know whether there will be a bail ruling tomorrow. Little argument left, but Nair could, theoretically, take weekend to consider.
16:10 - Prosecutor Nel tells BBCs Andrew Harding "not more than an hour" left for his argument on Friday.