NPA looking weak ahead of Pistorius trial
But, for many legal scholars in South Africa, the real spotlight will be on state lawyers from the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA).
While the NPA claims a conviction rate of 88%, setbacks in a recent string of high-profile cases are damaging the organisation's public image.
Prosecutors failed to convict police officers accused of killing activist Andries Tatane during a protest in 2011; one of the men accused of gang-raping and killing 17-year-old Anene Booysen was released for lack of evidence; and J Arthur Brown, who allegedly swindled thousands of widows and orphans out of their savings, was able to walk away with a fine and a suspended sentence.
Something is sorely wrong
Judges in South Africa have not spared criticism. In case after case, they have lashed out at police and prosecutors.
"Something is sorely wrong and I can only think the prosecution's case has been poorly handled," Judge Anton Veldhuizen said during Brown's criminal trial.
Outside the courtroom, critics are less diplomatic and express a deeper level of concern for the state of the prosecution, amid what they say is a lack of leadership, budget cutbacks, alleged political interference, and outright incompetence.
The problems with the NPA have been ongoing for years, and include alleged improprieties regarding graft cases against Jacob Zuma, now president, in the period right before he took office.
More recently, top prosecutor Glynnis Breytenbach says she lost her job because she pursued an investigation into Richard Mdluli, an allegedly corrupt former head of police intelligence.
The picture arising from all this "suggests a toxic mixture of undue political influence and the incompetence of prosecutors", says Sipho Pityana, head of the Council for the Advancement of the South African Constitution, a think-tank.
NPA boss
William Booth, a criminal lawyer based in Cape Town, says the NPA is in dire need of a boss who can take charge and set the organisation on a better course.