I am really confused and feel conflicted about what is correct and what is not correct or right.
I've read this thread and the more I have read from everyone who has posted, the more afraid I have become that I will post something that is not judged to be allowed or is not deemed to follow the guidelines.
This feeling started days ago and it's increased to the point that I have butterflies in my stomach from just reading.
Right now, I feel absolutely sick posting, I am so tentative with my choice of words.
Maybe it's this case in particular which has different aspects from most, the extreme lack of national media coverage being the hallmark difference, and my admiration for and faith in Misterallgood and his concern in bringing the case to posters attention being another unusual difference. Of course, so many posters have been Google Girls and found historical data which has added so much to our understanding of what personalities and habits of the couple were, and we have learned with every new thing which has been uncovered. Thank you to NCBanker, too, who selflessly went to the Abaroa crimescene and posted photos of the house for us, and has given us answers for financel- related questions.
This case touches my heart deeply; so do the tedious hours of work posted here for a month. An incredible database has been sourced through the life of an Internet junkie and his prolific recording of personal reactions, family action and interaction, and statements which reflect an attitude, dude.
I think that every poster who has added information in the way of archived web entries, photos of the Abaroa house, and confirmed as well as unconfirmed source information has given additional understanding of possible dynamics and stressors inside the Abaroa family structure.
Thank you for many hours of searching and posting. I consider you to be very valuable and dedicated to Janet's case.
This may be my last post on this case, at least until something breaks in the news, hopefully... some day... when the crime lab in NC has time to dedicate to evidence testing....
It's my feeling that some people who have posted with an obvious diligence and caring have been somewhat muted.
I respect the moderators of the forums at WS and suspect that theirs is a thankless volunteer job most of the time. .. I see both sides, and the fact is that there is not really neutral ground possible once a person formulates a personal theory about the likely perpetrator of a murder.. charged or not. We are not defense attorneys, court judges or jurists, so we have the freedom to discuss personal theories, I would think.
I hope this all gets smoothed out with consideration and understanding. I don't want to see anyone be stressed or have their work removed, or a moderator have to defend his or her position repeatedly either. It's unproductive for all.
I will be supporting you fellow posters who are diligently seeking clues for justice in spirit, and will be reading your findings, thoughts, theories.
I do not find the atmosphere exactly conducive to my continued posting due to the LACK of solid evidence related to Janet's murder at this time, which seems to be a pre-requisite for an advancing discussion here. I don't want to break any rules and until there is news reported from either NC or national news outlets, I don't know what I can add or discuss.
Maybe I am identifying too much with the victim, and maybe our collective desire to see this case receive media attention and LE results has piled on layers of caring as well as frustration. The direction which this discussion has taken is a bit overwhelming for me. I really don't know what can be and should be posted at this point in time.
Many of us have read through tons of posts on other true crime cases here as a guest before we registered, I think.. I know that with the Ramsey case, there has been speculation on everything from a child sex ring to CO political conspiracies, to a small boy having knowledge and a desire for frightening sexual behavior such as erotic asphixiation posted. As far as I know from the last time I read the Ramsey case threads, all of that speculation was allowed to stand, weird and far-flung as it is and has been.
Does anyone see why I am feeling concerned and confused as well as very uneasy about posting on the Abaroa case? Read the long and ongoing Ramsey debates, many of which are speculative in nature and range from the sublime to the absurd and maybe it will be a bit clearer as to why I do not know what to post on this Abaroa case thread any longer.