I know abandonment was given as the reason, but Ron's lawyer said that Ron was given an offer to go back on a Monday, (can't remember what Monday), but the Friday before that Monday, the offer was withdrawn. If that's what really happened...that's not abandonment! So, it looks like, as some others have posted, that Ron either abandoned his job that night, or they all 'settled' on the official reason. IDK...but, going back to the beginning of this case, sure brings up a lot of unanswered questions. In hindsight, it shows what a good lawyer, Shoemaker really is. That guy has done his job & then some. So many suspicious issues have been pushed into the background...& this case has become about...Ron the innocent, getting a 'sweet' deal, Tommy the druggie, getting what he deserved, & Misty the mastermind, getting the door slammed in her face. wooaah, somebody needs to put on the brakes. Them going to prison, isn't the end of this case...no matter who all would like it to be. MOO.
Exactly! You can't abandon your job in advance! So, if Ron was to go back on Monday but was told on Friday not to come back, it was not for the reason stated. Meaning, Ron's termination was not because he failed to show up as scheduled after his leave of absence, and it wasn't because he neglected to keep in touch with his employer.
It still could be a job abandonment issue, though. If the company found out Ron had left the work site during any work shift, that might be job abandonment.
Another thing I must question: The company allegedly instructed their employees not to discuss anything having to do with RC's employment and subsequent termination with anyone outside of the workplace. WTH?