Unless I missed something recently, only Misty's test reports have been published. Unfortunately, because I think we'd all love to see them. No, they're not fail proof, but in Misty's case she was given a total of five or six tests in three different formats over the course of a year. The first was inconclusive, and the rest showed a significant level of deception. Taking into consideration possible flaws in the testing methods, when you look at the results as a whole, it spells l-i-a-r. As for the first one being inconclusive, I imagine she didn't give clear yes and no answers because the details of "the story" hadn't been worked out yet.
I remember seeing a list of questions that Misty was asked, and her different levels of deception. The only question that she didn't fail with a high 90%, dealt with Haleigh's location. I'm not sure, but I think this was the poly arranged by Tim Miller. I don't understand any of the LDTs and don't know why more straight forward and specific questions weren't asked. I remember one of the questions asking whether she had held back information. Well, duhh, that question was a waste of time. Why not ask, 'did you kill Haleigh'? maybe that line of questioning isn't allowed? JMO.bbm, yes I think we all would.
Misty's hypnosis was a bust iirc, I think I recall the examiner saying she was not under.
Then the layered voice "test", but I don't think we have seen any other tests of Misty's, deceptive or inconclusive or otherwise iirc.
Living here in Putnam county Florida for over 25 plus years... I can assure you that there are NO SURVEILLANCE cameras, such as along any of the streets that one travels. The ONLY camera's available are the ones that are INSIDE the convenience stores and that's for their security such as being possibly robbed. Since HaLeigh's disappearance there have been SOME camera's installed at SOME businesses in PALATKA. In Satsuma and Welaka... NO.
ITA... Somehow I doubt GGM would want us to know her supposedly route and who was in the car with her coming & going IF she was anywhere near that MH. Yikes, it might actually provide a real time.
As far as Ron, why does he need a detailed alibi that doesn't make sense?
I remember seeing a list of questions that Misty was asked, and her different levels of deception. The only question that she didn't fail with a high 90%, dealt with Haleigh's location. I'm not sure, but I think this was the poly arranged by Tim Miller. I don't understand any of the LDTs and don't know why more straight forward and specific questions weren't asked. I remember one of the questions asking whether she had held back information. Well, duhh, that question was a waste of time. Why not ask, 'did you kill Haleigh'? maybe that line of questioning isn't allowed? JMO.
Thank you Ger. I was just hoping that there was at least one video camera on any of the routes taken by players in this case.
Got it. Everything that Misty said about AS being there that night means nothing. If LE is really using that "visit" as part of their timeline, no wonder they can't solve this case.
Greenwood has stated....."It's been clear from day one that the contradicting statements from the family members are not the truth," so IMO LE should have never ever considered GGMS' story to be the truth and they should have never used any part of her story to establish a time line..JMHO.
I dont think they are basing it on Annette, I think the timeline at 7 starts when Ron punched in.
jmo
IIRC. Shoemaker stated Ron C's shift started at 5:00 pm and Ron C was there that day approximatley 40 minutes before his shift started.. Not that I believe that to be true, but WHY would LE start their time line after Ron C clocked in that night?
Why would they base it on 7 when Annette said she saw them? She has a reason to lie.
Don't ask me.. JM could answer that question better than I can...
IIRC Ron C claimed he was the main investigator...And GGMS stated she didn't believe anything unless she heard it from John..Seems to me they are on a first name basis...JMHO
Well, I really believe the timeline starts when Ron went to work, it matches the time he told the PAstor he worked, and thats why the LE said HOWEVER, him being at work means nothing considering they dont know when what happened did. If the LE are really basing a timeline on someone who would lie for Ron we are in trouble.
jmo
Thank you Ger. I was just hoping that there was at least one video camera on any of the routes taken by players in this case.
I agree. IMO AS coming forward with the statement that Misty was there that evening put a real kink into the investigation. Not only the story changed but the timeline changed as to when she was at the MH. It was moved from 7:00 pm to 8:00 pm. This statement appears to taken at face value by LE and the so-called timeline based upon her statement. Misty later on comes up with the very detailed sing-song recitation of the events that evening to reinforce AS's statement as well as Teresa's statement about sending over family members to check on the children. At this same time, AS and Teresa were singing praises about Misty so why did Teresa feel the need to send the family member to check on the children. Why was there concern at this time of the evening? This was supposedly prior to Misty "turning her phone off" and Ronald not being able to contact her. At this point, Ronald and Misty were suppose to have been having a little spat over the phone. So, why the need to send AS over?