Gilgo Beach LISK Serial Killer, Rex Heuermann, charged with 3 murders, July 2023 #7

Status
Not open for further replies.
I saw this too and this is just completely BAFFLING to me.

Why they did not obtain a warrant to obtain his DNA via Buccal Swab on arrest is confounding. Why did they wait? They'd been tailing his for some time already at that point.

On another note, it solves the mystery surrounding the hearing #623

jmo

That's why I queried what the "motion" for buccal swab was a few days ago...I was confused why they'd be asking for one then

I just assumed they'd have warrant for one on arrest. LE had spent months getting warrants for all cell records, online searches, the properties and just about everything else connected to him...so I was surprised this hasn't been tied up in advance too
 
Interesting. I had not realized that Othrams post here indicates that.

My brain has tumbled around wondering why her name was kept secret and why the Task Force went straight into the secrecy of the Grand Jury almost immediately after her name was learned.

I also kept remembering DA Tierney saying they knew they were being watched, but I couldn't figure out HOW they knew they were being watched.

But he told us in the first Press Conference after RH's arrest.

RH was identified March 14, 2022. Karen Vergata was identified in September and her family notified in October, according to transcript of press conference. It was at that time the Task Force decided to go into the confidentiality/secrecy of the Grand Jury. AND they took Vergata's identity with them.

By that time RH had been a suspect since March 14. They had been executing warrants and collecting into on him. Among the information were his cell phone records. The Task Force knew about his searches for their progress on the case, according to Tierney at the first press conference.

So, does the decision to take Karen Vergata's ID into the Grand Jury with the Gilgo 4 investigation signify they can link her to RH?
This is completely MOO but I couldn't help but wonder, why would the Task Force wait until after RH's arrest to announce Fire Island Jane Doe (Karen) had been identified unless they believed that doing so would jeopardize their case against RH (i.e., tipping him off because he could possibly be responsible for Karen's death)?
 
This is completely MOO but I couldn't help but wonder, why would the Task Force wait until after RH's arrest to announce Fire Island Jane Doe (Karen) had been identified unless they believed that doing so would jeopardize their case against RH (i.e., tipping him off because he could possibly be responsible for Karen's death)?

I really like the way your brain works!! ;)
 
This is completely MOO but I couldn't help but wonder, why would the Task Force wait until after RH's arrest to announce Fire Island Jane Doe (Karen) had been identified unless they believed that doing so would jeopardize their case against RH (i.e., tipping him off because he could possibly be responsible for Karen's death)?

MOO As the DA has alluded to I believe they were controlling the story while observing RH behavior and possible reaction. They did notify family of her ID, which was the correct action.
 
This is completely MOO but I couldn't help but wonder, why would the Task Force wait until after RH's arrest to announce Fire Island Jane Doe (Karen) had been identified unless they believed that doing so would jeopardize their case against RH (i.e., tipping him off because he could possibly be responsible for Karen's death)?
That’s exactly what I assumed also. Makes the most sense
 
MOO As the DA has alluded to I believe they were controlling the story while observing RH behavior and possible reaction. They did notify family of her ID, which was the correct action.

Apparently, some members of the family didn't know of her ID until (fairly) recently. It doesn't appear her father knew before his death. My conclusion per some of the recent posts and links on her WS thread.

 
I realize there’s likely no answer to the situation but this case and so many others as in Robert Pickton from Canada and the recent arrest of man in Reno Nevada brings me back to question of what actions could better protect these women who are obviously at risk constantly from unknown predators?
 
I realize there’s likely no answer to the situation but this case and so many others as in Robert Pickton from Canada and the recent arrest of man in Reno Nevada brings me back to question of what actions could better protect these women who are obviously at risk constantly from unknown predators?
My answer doesn't really help because it takes a long time and apparently is unrealistic, but the best solution is that men don't prey on victims.

Yes, I know women prey on victims too, so, sure, include them as well.

Don't prey on people, people!

I know, I know, unrealistic.


jmo
 
My answer doesn't really help because it takes a long time and apparently is unrealistic, but the best solution is that men don't prey on victims.

Yes, I know women prey on victims too, so, sure, include them as well.

Don't prey on people, people!

I know, I know, unrealistic.


jmo
No more unrealistic than me asking my question, you’re are right though as humans we should be better than all this.
 
This is completely MOO but I couldn't help but wonder, why would the Task Force wait until after RH's arrest to announce Fire Island Jane Doe (Karen) had been identified unless they believed that doing so would jeopardize their case against RH (i.e., tipping him off because he could possibly be responsible for Karen's death)?

I think they just decided not to announce anything Gilgo related in case it spooked him (whether he did it or not) as it would be confirmation investigation work was ongoing.

Conversely, maybe they toyed with making the announcement before the arrest...since they were monitoring his movements LE could see what reaction he made (if any) regarding online searches etc.

Deciding that they had (more than) enough evidence they went for arrest first. We know they intentionally did it away from home and were aware he had guns...so erred on the side of caution - my thoughts
 
I realize there’s likely no answer to the situation but this case and so many others as in Robert Pickton from Canada and the recent arrest of man in Reno Nevada brings me back to question of what actions could better protect these women who are obviously at risk constantly from unknown predators?
Not unlike having ''diamonds on the soles of their shoes'', thinking of SW having little transmitters tucked into shoes that sends real time tracking data to a special private receiver that can be erased immediately, or be pre-arranged to be opened if something goes wrong.
If the perp keeps the shoe, he can be located too.
speculation. imo.fwiw
2015
''Since 2003, officers with KARE, one of the only projects of its kind in the country, have met with people who live and work on the streets to ask them if they'd like to provide DNA samples for their database. It has grown to 1,200 names — including girls as young as 12. An RCMP Inspector told VICE News that women are adding themselves to the list every day. Recently, KARE has expanded its mandate and officers review files of missing vulnerable persons throughout the province. According to one officer involved with KARE, while murder rates in the Edmonton area have gone down, the number of women who vanish "remains steady."
 
Live Stream c/o USA Today of the presser (YT link at bottom of page):

How bittersweet the day for Karen's family. RIP - we got him!
Screenshot 2023-08-04 10.49.00 PM.png


 
My theory is he dumped the bodies to throw off jurisdictions some parts found in Nassau county some found in Suffolk county and I also think he did this to also make it harder to ID the victims. Karen's torso has never been found. To my knowledge only her skull and legs were found.
In April 1996, the legs of an unidentified woman were recovered inside of a black garbage bag at Blue Point Beach in Suffolk County, New York. Later, in April 2011, the woman’s skull was recovered near Ocean Parkway west of Tobay Beach in Nassau County, New York. The woman’s torso and hands were never recovered.

Investigators determine the woman was white and likely between the ages of 18 and 50. They discovered several scars on the decedent’s right leg including a 3 1/2” on the lateral mid-leg area, a 1” linear scar on the lateral mid to lower leg, and a ½” scar on the medial ankle. The woman’s left leg had a 2" surgical scar with adjacent suture scars on the medial left ankle. The woman had red nail polish on all toes that, at the time of her discovery in 1996, was noted to be from a recent pedicure.
122003b8-32e0-11ee-b5d1-0242ac140003.jpg


In 2022, the Suffolk County Police Department in collaboration with the FBI teamed with Othram to determine if advanced DNA testing could help to identify Fire Island Jane Doe. Forensic evidence was sent to Othram’s laboratory in The Woodlands, Texas. Othram scientists developed a suitable DNA extract from the forensic evidence and then used Forensic-Grade Genome Sequencing® to build a comprehensive genealogical profile. After successfully completing the process, the DNA profile was delivered to the FBI's forensic genetic genealogy team and the FBI team performed the necessary work to generate investigative leads.

The FBI team working with Suffolk County Police Department continued the investigation and were eventually able to confirmed the identity of Fire Island Jane Doe as Karen Vergata of Manhattan, New York. Vergata was 34 years old at the time of her death. Vergata was missing since Valentine's Day in 1996.
 
My theory is he dumped the bodies to throw off jurisdictions some parts found in Nassau county some found in Suffolk county and I also think he did this to also make it harder to ID the victims. Karen's torso has never been found. To my knowledge only her skull and legs were found.

Our late great @Foxfire used to refer to this as “jurisdictional (linkage) blindness”
 
I'm not sleeping at the moment, so I've been pondering the photo of Karen Vergata that has been released.

She was 34 years old when she died. Is that the only photo of her that exists, in which she was obviously a teen, or possibly even a 12-year-old, at most?

If so, how sad. What happened in her life that made it stop being recorded in photographs at such a young age? Why aren't there any later pictures of her?
 
Last edited:
I'm not sleeping at the moment, so I've been pondering the photo of Karen Verdata that has been released.

She was 34 years old when she died. Is that the only photo of her that exists, in which she was obviously a teen, or possibly even a 12-year-old, at most?

If so, how sad. What happened in her life that made it stop being recorded in photographs at such a young age? Why aren't there any later pictures of her?
There's another where she looks closer to seventeen, black and white, looks like a yearbook photo.

It's possible that she left home at a young age, that photos of her taken later have not survived. It's possible that there are photos of her as an adult, but they are booking photos. It's possible that some calamity (fire, flood) in the home destroyed other photos of her.

It's possible that the photo released was the favourite photo of her that the family possesses.

There are a lot of reasons why that photo could have been chosen.

This is the era before people had a camera on their phone that they took with them everywhere. To take pictures, you had to have a camera, you had to get the film developed, and you had to have taken a 'good' picture to begin with, with lighting and framing done right.

The two that we've seen, the colour one from the press conference and the black and white yearbook photo are both professionally taken school photos, I would guess. They've been framed and lit and focused well, and both look good when blown up to the resolution needed for a press release.

MOO
 
This is the era before people had a camera on their phone that they took with them everywhere. To take pictures, you had to have a camera, you had to get the film developed, and you had to have taken a 'good' picture to begin with, with lighting and framing done right.

MOO

Snipped for focus

Oh, I know. I myself lived through that era! In fact Karen and I were approximately the same age, which probably explains why I feel so bad for her.

Because if I'd gone missing at the same age she did, there would have been many photos available of me taken much closer to the time I went missing than a yearbook photo taken what, 17 or so years earlier.

Snapshots. And a lot of them turned out pretty good even without the photographer paying too much attention to lighting and framing, because we were amateurs using cameras that took snapshots.

Heck, I even have a couple of Polaroids of me as a younger woman than KV was when she died that are decent likenesses and could have been released to show me much closer to my actual age than school/yearbook photos.
 
Last edited:
Snipped for focus

Oh, I know. I myself lived through that era! In fact Karen and I were approximately the same age, which probably explains why I feel so bad for her.

Because if I'd gone missing at the same age she did, there would have been many photos available of me taken much closer to the time I went missing than a yearbook photo taken what, 17 or so years earlier.

Snapshots. And a lot of them turned out pretty good even without the photographer paying too much attention to lighting and framing, because we were amateurs using cameras that took snapshots.

Heck, I even have a couple of Polaroids of me as a younger woman than KV was when she died that are decent likenesses and could have been released to show me much closer to my actual age than school/yearbook photos.
I was assuming that is the photo LE was able to find publicly, not that the family doesn't have photos. But that's just an assumption.

jmo
 
Snipped for focus

Oh, I know. I myself lived through that era! In fact Karen and I were approximately the same age, which probably explains why I feel so bad for her.

Because if I'd gone missing at the same age she did, there would have been many photos available of me taken much closer to the time I went missing than a yearbook photo taken what, 17 or so years earlier.

Snapshots. And a lot of them turned out pretty good even without the photographer paying too much attention to lighting and framing, because we were amateurs using cameras that took snapshots.

Heck, I even have a couple of Polaroids of me as a younger woman than KV was when she died that are decent likenesses and could have been released to show me much closer to my actual age than school/yearbook photos.
I am a photographer and family historian. I think it comes down to different families and individuals having very different values and norms cerntered around taking and keeping track of photos. My observations ( MOO) are that this has become less of a large divide with advent of smart phones and social media, but when I work on photo genealogy projects for previous generations it is often feast or famine for photos. There are some families that don't have a single photo and others who have shoeboxes full of snapshots. Also sometimes families living in poverty or with frequent moves used to lose all of their photos if they had to move quickly and leave things behind. I'm not saying this is for sure the case, but I'm rarely surprised at whether or not a family has photos, let alone good ones to release for these older cases especially. It still surprises me in recent missing cases, though I'm sure some of the same factors apply.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
155
Guests online
673
Total visitors
828

Forum statistics

Threads
625,971
Messages
18,516,746
Members
240,909
Latest member
spaceunicorns
Back
Top