Josh Zeman said the forensic work was brilliant on all RH's cell phone data.It is fascinating. I’d love to see the distribution of these calls…timewise
I don't think the filing referenced is available on line at the moment, although it does appear to be in the hands of a great number of journalists: main stream and major social media.Are the latest court documents filed by the defense and prosecution available online?
Here's a more detailed breakdown from Tierney.I don't think the filing referenced is available on line at the moment, although it does appear to be in the hands of a great number of journalists: main stream and major social media.
The document, if I am understanding it properly, is actually the prosecution's response to a defense motion filed to suppress evidence. So I presume everything we have learned or heard again (some info was in charging documents) is the subject of a defense motion filed motion to suppress. Defense probably was arguing that the information is not really relevant to the charged crimes, but rather just prior bad acts that are about character. IANAL, but I believe prosecutors can't use ad hominem arguments against the person they are accusing. They can't say, "He did ____, so why wouldn't he commit this crime?" Instead, prosecutors have to show that the information actually proves the crimes for which he is going to trial directly.
For example, contacts with sex workers can't be used to show how depraved he is, but they might be allowed as evidence to show that this is how he killed any of the 7 women he is on trial for murdering.
So I think there might be two documents we have not seen. A motion to suppress evidence from the defense, and the reply from the prosecution. That's a hint as to which side is using media leaks now.
MOO
Do you think that when the documents are leaked presumed by the prosecution are they done so under the condition that the reporters don't publish them?I don't think the filing referenced is available on line at the moment, although it does appear to be in the hands of a great number of journalists: main stream and major social media.
The document, if I am understanding it properly, is actually the prosecution's response to a defense motion filed to suppress evidence. So I presume everything we have learned or heard again (some info was in charging documents) is the subject of a defense motion filed motion to suppress. Defense probably was arguing that the information is not really relevant to the charged crimes, but rather just prior bad acts that are about character. IANAL, but I believe prosecutors can't use ad hominem arguments against the person they are accusing. They can't say, "He did ____, so why wouldn't he commit this crime?" Instead, prosecutors have to show that the information actually proves the crimes for which he is going to trial directly.
For example, contacts with sex workers can't be used to show how depraved he is, but they might be allowed as evidence to show that this is how he killed any of the 7 women he is on trial for murdering.
So I think there might be two documents we have not seen. A motion to suppress evidence from the defense, and the reply from the prosecution. That's a hint as to which side is using media leaks now.
MOO
Here's a more detailed breakdown from Tierney.
"Tierney, who is prosecuting the case against accused Gilgo killer Rex Heuermann, submitted an affirmation and memorandum of law in opposition to an omnibus motion presented by the defense in January."
cont
![]()
Accused Gilgo Killer A 'Sexual Sadist' Who Contacted 60 Prostitutes, Searched For 'Torture' Porn: DA
Accused Gilgo Beach killer Rex Heuermann reached out to more than 60 sex workers before his arrest, an explosive new filing indicates.patch.com
No. I think they are leaked because the prosecution thinks the media attention will benefit them in some way.Do you think that when the documents are leaked presumed by the prosecution are they done so under the condition that the reporters don't publish them?
I still think he will take a plea deal, I don't think he wants to sit in court listening to weeks of testimony about his sexual proclivities and what he did to his victims,