• #81
Are the latest court documents filed by the defense and prosecution available online?

 
  • #82
It is fascinating. I’d love to see the distribution of these calls…timewise
Josh Zeman said the forensic work was brilliant on all RH's cell phone data.
Laura Ingles said they even got records from US Customs and Border Protection from when he was in Iceland.
Josh Z said a plea deal.
Joe G said after the documents are read he does see a lot of plea deal talk but thinks RH will go to trial.

Are there recent documents from Defense & prosection available?

RH back in court March 17th..St.Patrick's Day

@ 26:10
RH/ new documents.


 
  • #83
Zeman and Mary Murphy.
They've know each other for 25 years.

Uploaded 2 days ago
Edit.
Even though uploaded 2 days ago MM mentions they're filming on Dec.11th..the 15 anniversary of the first victim being found on Gilgo, Dec.11, 2010.
Weird it's just uploaded now, so It's before the latest on the RH trial/ new documents.

 
Last edited:
  • #84
I’m guessing the odds for a trial and no plea went up after Dykes. Makes it seem like there’s a chance in hell…

Then of course the ”help” offered from Burke means something. God knows what…
 
  • #85
Are the latest court documents filed by the defense and prosecution available online?

I don't think the filing referenced is available on line at the moment, although it does appear to be in the hands of a great number of journalists: main stream and major social media.

The document, if I am understanding it properly, is actually the prosecution's response to a defense motion filed to suppress evidence. So I presume everything we have learned or heard again (some info was in charging documents) is the subject of a defense motion filed motion to suppress. Defense probably was arguing that the information is not really relevant to the charged crimes, but rather just prior bad acts that are about character. IANAL, but I believe prosecutors can't use ad hominem arguments against the person they are accusing. They can't say, "He did ____, so why wouldn't he commit this crime?" Instead, prosecutors have to show that the information actually proves the crimes for which he is going to trial directly.

For example, contacts with sex workers can't be used to show how depraved he is, but they might be allowed as evidence to show that this is how he killed any of the 7 women he is on trial for murdering.

So I think there might be two documents we have not seen. A motion to suppress evidence from the defense, and the reply from the prosecution. That's a hint as to which side is using media leaks now.

MOO
 
  • #86
I don't think the filing referenced is available on line at the moment, although it does appear to be in the hands of a great number of journalists: main stream and major social media.

The document, if I am understanding it properly, is actually the prosecution's response to a defense motion filed to suppress evidence. So I presume everything we have learned or heard again (some info was in charging documents) is the subject of a defense motion filed motion to suppress. Defense probably was arguing that the information is not really relevant to the charged crimes, but rather just prior bad acts that are about character. IANAL, but I believe prosecutors can't use ad hominem arguments against the person they are accusing. They can't say, "He did ____, so why wouldn't he commit this crime?" Instead, prosecutors have to show that the information actually proves the crimes for which he is going to trial directly.

For example, contacts with sex workers can't be used to show how depraved he is, but they might be allowed as evidence to show that this is how he killed any of the 7 women he is on trial for murdering.

So I think there might be two documents we have not seen. A motion to suppress evidence from the defense, and the reply from the prosecution. That's a hint as to which side is using media leaks now.

MOO
Here's a more detailed breakdown from Tierney.

"Tierney, who is prosecuting the case against accused Gilgo killer Rex Heuermann, submitted an affirmation and memorandum of law in opposition to an omnibus motion presented by the defense in January."


cont
 
  • #87
I don't think the filing referenced is available on line at the moment, although it does appear to be in the hands of a great number of journalists: main stream and major social media.

The document, if I am understanding it properly, is actually the prosecution's response to a defense motion filed to suppress evidence. So I presume everything we have learned or heard again (some info was in charging documents) is the subject of a defense motion filed motion to suppress. Defense probably was arguing that the information is not really relevant to the charged crimes, but rather just prior bad acts that are about character. IANAL, but I believe prosecutors can't use ad hominem arguments against the person they are accusing. They can't say, "He did ____, so why wouldn't he commit this crime?" Instead, prosecutors have to show that the information actually proves the crimes for which he is going to trial directly.

For example, contacts with sex workers can't be used to show how depraved he is, but they might be allowed as evidence to show that this is how he killed any of the 7 women he is on trial for murdering.

So I think there might be two documents we have not seen. A motion to suppress evidence from the defense, and the reply from the prosecution. That's a hint as to which side is using media leaks now.

MOO
Do you think that when the documents are leaked presumed by the prosecution are they done so under the condition that the reporters don't publish them?
 
  • #88
Here's a more detailed breakdown from Tierney.

"Tierney, who is prosecuting the case against accused Gilgo killer Rex Heuermann, submitted an affirmation and memorandum of law in opposition to an omnibus motion presented by the defense in January."


cont

This is an excellent, detailed article that outlines the case and evidence against RH well. Thanks for posting!
 
  • #89
Do you think that when the documents are leaked presumed by the prosecution are they done so under the condition that the reporters don't publish them?
No. I think they are leaked because the prosecution thinks the media attention will benefit them in some way.

MOO
 
  • #90
I still think he will take a plea deal, I don't think he wants to sit in court listening to weeks of testimony about his sexual proclivities and what he did to his victims,
 
  • #91
I still think he will take a plea deal, I don't think he wants to sit in court listening to weeks of testimony about his sexual proclivities and what he did to his victims,

He may plead out but IMO it won't be to avoid hearing about what he did. I think it's part of his dark nature to get a thrill from it.

JMO
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
203
Guests online
1,819
Total visitors
2,022

Forum statistics

Threads
644,545
Messages
18,819,805
Members
245,389
Latest member
bonecartographer
Top