3:05 newsman: in your opinion is there a third person involved here?
experienced well-known lawyer: (let's out a sigh) I think in a week from now we'll have a solution
newswoman: what do you mean?
lawyer: using logic here . . . B showed such a level of coolness (emotionless) in front of the cameras, only hours after the murder he committed . . . such an eerie image of coolness, shows that this was premeditated . . . and the premeditation, we don't know if it was a day, a week, or a month ahead of time . . . using logic, this wasn't some random event
5:12 newsman: so you're telling us that some things (pieces) are missing from the puzzle?
5:14 lawyer:
many things (pieces) are missing from the puzzle. If
persons or motive or accessory are missing from the puzzle . . . I think LE has done excellent work . . .
5:33 newswoman: therefore you're saying you're not persuaded by the motive given by B in his plea?
lawyer: goes on to describe the suffocation of C could have been 5 minutes, but might have been as much as 8-10 minutes
6:44 newsman: in other words, he was determined to kill her
6:50 lawyer: these things are for the authorities (i.e. prosecution, examining judge) to assess, and I think we have a considerable amount of road ahead (in this case)
the lawyer says a lot, but I've edited it to give you what I see as the highlights