- Joined
- Apr 4, 2009
- Messages
- 103
- Reaction score
- 994
I'm confused. So there really is a diary and TM has a copy of it in a folder?
I don’t know but I remember hearing about TM having a notebook of info about the Elvis family.
I'm confused. So there really is a diary and TM has a copy of it in a folder?
Yes, an attorney can't give testimony so whatever info you want to impart to the jury has to be done through a witness.
I think that several here mostly figured all of this out before this trial ever began. I'm just now "getting it" from piecing together what I've learned in this trial.
I think if I can do it from this trial, then this jury can also.
Those significant lies & the fact that google was deleted for both accounts, the memory card was taken out of the truck, the DVR system is missing from the house, Tammy‘s computer is missing from the house. all point to guilt. GUILTY!
just going t hru all that was opened back up on the TM and SM fb pages..<modsnipped>and funny enough that the photos aren't in ''order' of date either. Makes you think someone goes in and changes dates on them to suit a storyline IMO
RSBM
Or, by constantly asking, "would it surprise you....." This is the defense's tactics to get testimony in.
Can someone point me to SM & TM's phone pings after 3:40am on the night HE was kidnapped?
I think that several here mostly figured all of this out before this trial ever began. I'm just now "getting it" from piecing together what I've learned in this trial.
I think if I can do it from this trial, then this jury can also.
If you listen to the defense you'll understand. Nancy Livesay's (the prosecution) signature comment is "If you don't mind..."I appreciate this comment as a newcomer. I was wondering why "would it surprise you..." was mentioned several times. Thanks!
RSBM: I remember thinking her smirk almost looked like a "touche!" Like she was surprised Nancy had it in her.TM's little smirk after that exchange indicated to me that she thought she'd won. I disagree.
This is an interesting post:
If you listen to the defense you'll understand. Nancy Livesay's (the prosecution) signature comment is "If you don't mind..."
BBM: So good to hear! Please let the jury be as smart as you, @Sun!I think that several here mostly figured all of this out before this trial ever began. I'm just now "getting it" from piecing together what I've learned in this trial.
I think if I can do it from this trial, then this jury can also.
Same. Reading Sun's post allowed me to exhale a breath I didn't know I was still holding in.This is encouraging to me as someone who has followed and dissected the case from the beginning. It's impossible for me to see it from a jury's eyes.
This is encouraging to me as someone who has followed and dissected the case from the beginning. It's impossible for me to see it from a jury's eyes.
From testimony from SM Contempt of Court Hearing July 31, 2017:
According to Moorer, his wife had started handcuffing him to the bed at night so he wouldn't leave.
BAM
Thank you!
Wish this could be allowed in, but I doubt it.
She's such a liar in SO many ways.
I continue to feel awful for her kids, although I have to admit I was pleased to hear that the oldest is out on his own and supposedly doing well. I hope that is true. I also hope he smartens up and severs all ties with his family, save perhaps his paternal grandparents who seem so normal compared to the rest of the lot.
Pure gold. Thank you @yupikgirl!