Thanks. I found the link upthread. After some backward searching, I found it.Yes, I'm sorry. I thought I quoted the post that had the namus link. I'm on my phone and have fat fingers lol
Thanks. I found the link upthread. After some backward searching, I found it.Yes, I'm sorry. I thought I quoted the post that had the namus link. I'm on my phone and have fat fingers lol
Back to the "pretty well concluded it's not her" vs. the "ruled out" statements we've read...IF they have ruled out Heather, shouldn't she be listed under "Exclusions," right there with Kristine Bruce? Or am I being clueless again?
I noticed it has also been updated to say "18-25 year old" female.
I wonder if they've shown photos of the robe and stuff to Heather's family or roommate to see if they recognized it?
Dental records should not take that long to read; I was an assistant and could read them immediately, just
by identifying the teeth, one missing, filled etc. x-rays would also be used to assist if they needed them.
The only response to that that I have is it could be somebody that is not on file, perhaps an illegal?
It is definitely interesting that she hasn't officially been ruled out on namus. Perhaps it is "taking so long" deliberately as evidence or something, or it just simply isn't her...there is definitely more going on in the background, but who knows whyI think the biggest concern we have is ruling out HE, not so much getting an ID on the remains. That is important obviously but why is it taking so long to rule out (or confirm) that these remains are HE.
Kristine Bruce ruled out on 3/17/15