Who knows what's in a person's heart, Roy?
Would you care to explain this superdave? Curious as to what you mean.
Who knows what's in a person's heart, Roy?
The DNA under JBR's fingernails is frequently referred to in the media as DNA evidence. Even if it doesn't match other DNA, it still can be matched to an owner, otherwise its not DNA evidence. IDI can have more than one DNA owner because there can be more than one intruder.
Whatever happened to the public hair that police collected at the scene. Was it ever tested? I wonder if they got DNA off of it and it matches the other DNA.
Nope, you are wrong holdon, it is DEGRADED and UNUSABLE...and it was contaminated by the USED clippers that was used to collect those fingernails, so it cannot be matched to an owner. You can't test DEGRADED, UNUSABLE DNA. That is WHY they call it unusable. Just ask Pam...she will tell you all about it. OR just at least READ what she said about it, in one of the articles that I posted earlier.
Whatever happened to the public hair that police collected at the scene. Was it ever tested? I wonder if they got DNA off of it and it matches the other DNA.
..and JB was wrapped the way a parent would wrap her,per experts.
The only thing that is DEGRADED and UNUSABLE is this POV, as it stands in complete opposition to multiple news and media reports that over and over again refer to 'fingernail DNA'. It exists, alright. And so does a media report that states something to the effect of 'those who linger on as RDI minimize the significance of the new DNA findings'.
Exactly... It was often referred to as being very similar in style to a "papoose wrap", bundled with 'love'.
Would you care to explain this superdave? Curious as to what you mean.
Whatever happened to the public hair that police collected at the scene. Was it ever tested? I wonder if they got DNA off of it and it matches the other DNA.
Even JOHN referred to her wrapped in the blanket that way..."Papoose style". Experts have said that she was wrapped "lovingly, the way that someone that cared for her would wrap her".
Simple: I just meant I don't know what Nancy Grace thinks because since this broke, she hasn't given a straight-out opinion.
Fits a kidnap for long-term scenario, doesn't it. Future bride for somebody is going to be handled with care, I think.
RDI just cant see the duct tape, 2nd ligature, and blanket as all preparation to move JBR to the car, I guess. RDI needs to 'wrap JBR lovingly' after brutally murdering her? The duct tape over her mouth doesn't fit that one, does it.
Nancy Grace not giving a straight out opinion, huh. To you that may not say much. She is really so good at apologizing. Those Duke boys can attest to that. :crazy:
Yeah, but I think that her saying that the "touch dna hardly exonerates the parents", speaks volumes. It sounds to me like she thinks that the Ramsey's are SOMEHOW involved.
Yeah, but I think that her saying that the "touch dna hardly exonerates the parents", speaks volumes. It sounds to me like she thinks that the Ramsey's are SOMEHOW involved.
You know, I can go with that. It still has shaped her opinion though. I think she has gone from they perfomed an act of killing to they are not completely exonerated. Good call.