Regarding SC's alibi: Yesterday, I read the text of his interview again.
http://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/story/...l&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer
'Mileka: "So tell me about what happened Sunday night."
Steven: "Sunday night? She picked me up from my house at 8:30, drove out to my truck that I got stuck in Keanae and she dropped me off at my truck -- it took me about 10 minutes to fix my truck, 'cause I had extra light tools with me at that time. And then we came back to Haiku. And I'm pretty sure I saw her lights in my rearview the entire time. I'm absolutely certain I saw her headlights in my rearview mirror until I got to Twin Falls and then I started speeding up 'cause I drive a little faster than she does."
...
Mileka: "But Nala was still in the car with Charli when you guys left Keanae?"
Steven: "Yep."'
Of the many parts of his story that make absolutely no sense in light of what has turned up so far, this is the most obvious lie, IMHO. SC states that he is "absolutely certain" that he saw her headlights in his rearview mirror until he got to Twin Falls,
and that Nala was still in the car with Charli when they left Keanae. So... how is it that Nala turned up in Nahiku the next morning with clean paws?[/QUOTE]
I shortened what you said for clarity... and BBM
I absolutely agree with you. Nala being found in Nahiku, and being clean does not fit his story.
That has been my question from day one. I realize that dogs can travel quite far but would she run along the roadway for that distance? In my opinion there has to be some type of connection with SC and that area. Whether its something or someone that SC went there for, there is a reason. Otherwise why did the dog turn up there.
Figure out what that is and maybe it will be a clue as to where Charli and the baby are.