I reread the section you pointed me towards, about the painting and speculation about the detached jawbone. Just excellent posts, glad I read them again.
FYI, the discussion of an ax as a tool -- the cutting blade that every household uses in Hawai'i is a machete. I haven't seen an ax in a long time (except higher up where people use firewood). A lot can be done with a sharp machete.
Here is the thing I said I had on my mind but couldn't bring myself to post. It is gruesome, but I'm sure her family has already thought about this and more. And I think there's value in figuring out what this means, what it might say about where he did this.
Prior posts in this topic came to terms with the ugly fact that she must have been decapitated or dismembered. The jawbone detached from the skull shows that she was not left whole. I noticed that it was always "a bone" from the first reporting, never a body part. Implying that it was pretty clean of flesh I thought. In Hawai'i, decomposition happens fast because it is the tropics, but you don't go from flesh to bone in less than four days, which is the maximum time that elapsed. Especially not in February, the coolest month, not by Nature alone. I think he may have helped the process along.
No one has remarked here on these portions of the articles on the defense motion:
First Maui News article on the filing of the motion to dismiss:
"The motion refers to a "gratuitous exchange" between the prosecutor and forensic pathologist over the doctor's use of the word "defleshing" to describe removing skin and muscle off a jaw.
"In your experience, have you ever come across that?" the prosecutor asks.
"I haven't personally ever had a case like this before, no," the witness answers."
Recent Maui News article on judge denying the motion:
"The hearsay evidence was from an entomologist with knowledge about maggots; a Los Angeles-based FBI agent who analyzed Capobianco's phone records along with other information and data for a timeline of events surrounding the alleged killing; Scott's dentist, who compared dental records with the jawbones suspected to be hers; a Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command forensic anthropologist who did a trauma analysis on jawbones suspected to be Scott's; and a Honolulu Police Department DNA specialist who examined fingernails suspected to be Scott's."
http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...se+revealed+in+motion&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&&ct=clnk
The analysis of jaw trauma ties in with your earlier analysis here. We also learn about fingernails for the first time. We had already heard that the clothes were discovered "filled with maggots." (ugh, I hate those things). I've seen maggots develop here in 2-3 days. I don't know if that is faster than on the mainland, but I think it might be. But that is the hatching. They don't do the full scope of their work that fast.
I found an article on "maceration" -- more standard term than defleshing, which is done by taxidermists, where they apply Dermestes beetles, to clean carcasses down to the bone.
http://extension.arizona.edu/sites/extension.arizona.edu/files/pubs/az1144.pdf (see No.3, Bug Box)
http://www.skullsite.co.uk/preparation/preparation.htm (not for the faint)
I'm wondering if he decided that he would use fast maceration to break down the evidence, if he hatched a bunch of them in advance and ... yeah, totally gross thought. But the entomologist was called; the word defleshing was used to describe turning a flesh covered jawbone into bone. The forensic pathologist said he had never seen such a case before; surely he had seen ordinary decomp routinely.
The clothes were found in a single pile not far off the path; they were not hidden. A pile of clothes doesn't suggest odds and ends dropped while working in the dark. It reads as a deliberate leaving, a taunting? And just enough of her to identify her, but not a body. The clothes were infested, so they must have been on her or near her very recently, perhaps she was left in them for the process. Well, that's as far into the darkness as my imagination will go. I don't hunt or kill things, and I'm not jaded as to what happens.
I feel though that this is something that would be done in a controlled, secure environment, not some rainy, dark, muddy place in the woods where hunters and fishermen do camp out regularly. So that is why I think she was killed in Haiku where he could control everything, and so that Nala did not see it, was sequestered in the vehicle maybe. The dog was not upset. She did not seem to know anything bad had happened. Also he is a dog person, and he would be very aware of Nala's potential to lead searchers to a spot. The dog could not be allowed to mark the key location by being in the truck out there near Keanae while he did this.
People keep saying that the body was buried or went into the ocean and could be found, but maybe he planned it so that there was nothing to find, except one bone. Maybe he saw her skull as a skull, and that is the story the painting is telling. And then he burned it?
My apologies for the gross factor of the post, but nothing pretty about this crime. My heart is so sad for this young woman and her almost child. Monster.