I have a feeling that in both this case, and in that of Heather Elvis, the jury may be required to conclude that the victim is dead. Jmo
I was a little confused by the fact that the Judge will not allow an attorney to look at any discovery before signing on "for the long haul" in a potential death penalty case. How could an attorney even let the client (or family of) know what potential fees and or retainer would be necessary. That doesn't seem fair to me. I'm not talking about the full "discovery" but at least what they are in for. I believe the point is moot because I believe it is WAY over their means. But I've never seen a Judge do that before. Am I crazy?
In TN, the rules of criminal procedure pretty much mirror the federal rules, so the discovery process would be governed by Rule 16.
https://www.tncourts.gov/rules/rules-criminal-procedure/16
There is no mandatory disclosure in TN state criminal cases. The defendant is required to request disclosure of evidence from the prosecution. If she is not his counsel of record she is unable to file any discovery requests (or pleadings) on his behalf. MOO, but I have seen many cases (civil and criminal) where judges will not allow attorneys to file pleadings in a case where they are not listed as an attorney of record.
Since I read the tweet today stating the DA has voluminous evidence on Zach Adams, I am beginning to believe that he is the only suspect in the aggravated kidnapping and murder of Holly.
He was arrested in February, 2014 and here we are almost in mid April, 2014, and there have been no other arrests connected to her case.
If the investigation of Adams has been ongoing for three years it just makes logical sense to me if anyone else was involved LE would have uncovered the other participants when they were investigating Adams. Especially since the names rumored have close ties with Adams, himself.
And really that makes a lot more sense to me. Almost every time we see cases like Holly's the kidnapping and murder was done by one sole perpetrator.
Now I suppose at some given point others could be arrested for lessor charges such as aiding and abetting possibly but that may not even happen either.
IMO
Thanks for the info. So it seems that a defendant is pretty well "boxed in" with a case like this to have a public defender. Unless they have enough money to just carte blanche an attorney. In a case like this how could an attorney "all in or all out"? Just wondering.
In the newly released court affidavit, Adams has been charge with witness coercion.
He is being held at the Chester County Jail and when he learned another inmate was being transferred to the same jail where his younger brother is being held he allegedly sent him a threatening message.
The affidavit reportedly said the message to John Dylan Adams, his brother who is serving time at another jail for a stolen firearms charge, said Hes the one who started this [expletive] and if he dont shut his mouth he will be in the hole beside her.
I am not sure that Holly was stalked. I'm wondering if ZA was just planning on breaking in and robbing the Bobo's. Holly happened to come out when ZA thought everyone would be gone. He didn't plan for Clint being there either. Once Holly screamed his plans changed and he took her.
ZA was known to rob people. Going through the woods to hit the homes in that area may be how he always committed robberies. I just think it would be odd for him to see her and plan an abduction. From what I have heard of meth heads, they are emotional, violent at times, and strung out if they are in need of a fix. Just because he has land and knows how to dump a body in a wilderness does not mean he is some genius outsmarting LE.
I just have a hard time buying into some complicated plan by some drug addict that had been caught for multiple crimes many times. JMO
Imo, ZA was the primary suspect by investigators in the HB abduction within the first ten days of the investigation...
If that was true, ZA is a convicted felon...It doesn't take much for LE to get a search warrant on a convicted felon. Pretty much a stiff breeze in his direction would have been enough, considering that there was no proof that Holly was not still alive 10 days after her abduction. I can't believe that they would have let possible forensic evidence sit while they waited for better "circumstantial" evidence. Obviously the X factor here is we have no idea what "NSA" type of surveillance technology the FBI/TBI might have to bring to bare on the situation, but even if they had been following his movements and communications, is that really more important than say a search warrant of his vehicle for Holly's blood when we know she was bleeding at the time of the kidnapping.. I just don't buy it.
I think in the beginning, ZA was part of the inner circle of city LE. This is purely speculation on my part. I'm pretty sure he did something for the town or county. Not anything official, like a go-fer or transportion. But he would have access to LE communications. He might have friends,(customers) or family also employed there. I am again speculating-- not been released to MSM or by LE. Plus, from what I understand, his family has money or is influential in this small town.
I also think that is why TBI took over the investigation.
Just my :twocents: and is not known as fact. Just wanted to make sure that was clear.
ETA: Plz don't ask for a link, 'cuz I don't have one.![]()
Since I read the tweet today stating the DA has voluminous evidence on Zach Adams, I am beginning to believe that he is the only suspect in the aggravated kidnapping and murder of Holly.
He was arrested in February, 2014 and here we are almost in mid April, 2014, and there have been no other arrests connected to her case.
If the investigation of Adams has been ongoing for three years it just makes logical sense to me if anyone else was involved LE would have uncovered the other participants when they were investigating Adams. Especially since the names rumored have close ties with Adams, himself.
And really that makes a lot more sense to me. Almost every time we see cases like Holly's the kidnapping and murder was done by one sole perpetrator.
Now I suppose at some given point others could be arrested for lessor charges such as aiding and abetting possibly but that may not even happen either.
IMO
I find this tweet very interesting.
Jordan Buie ‏
A district attorney's office prosecutor called the evidence retained against Zach Adams over three years "voluminous." #HollyBobo
The next scheduled court date for Zach Adams is April 30, 2014 at 1:00pm.
It seems by the Prosecutor's statements that they have been investigating Zach Adams all along during the entire time from when Holly went missing until he was arrested and charged.
I bet they have amassed a voluminous amount of evidence against him.
IMO