How much does Jeremy know?

Unless someone knew someone. Before what I just wrote is poo pooed, consider who their lawyer is?
Nothing has changed on casenet since they got a lawyer. Everything is the same as it was the very first week when I, and many others here, looked it up in the first couple of days. This has absolutely nothing to do with who anybody's lawyer is. She doesn't have a lawyer on record listed then or now for that case.
 
There were two tickets issued by Missouri Highway Patrol during one traffic stop.

Technically in Missouri, when MHP cites you during a traffic stop you are "arrested."

But it's a far cry from a DUI or DWI. Like I said....full moon :)
Thanks DeAnn. I should also add that she was charged with 301.020 which is failure to register a motor vehicle. That would be the other ticket.

That was case #070954285
 
But she was ARRESTED.

Here it is from the DMV of MO. . .

If you're caught driving without your insurance card, you can be ticketed, although you can usually have your ticket overturned if you present the court proof that you were insured at the time of citation.

Read more: DMV State Laws in Missouri | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/list_6826997_dmv-state-laws-missouri.html#ixzz1pXJ9ozdM

They do not arrest you for driving without insurance. DB was ARRESTED.
But she was arrested for failure to appear for this case.
 
I have a feeling that no matter what we say we aren't going to convince each other (is it a full moon tonight?) but if you look you can see she clearly didn't get a year's probation because she was cited Jan. 7, 2009, and it was imposed Feb. 19, 2009, to start and it lists Aug. 3, 2009, as completed before probation revoked. That's not a year. I know what the record says....but this was a state case, not a municipal case so it's handled differently in Missouri.

She was arraigned on 1/15/2009. Her probation was not completed on 08/03/2009. It was suspended. If her probation was completed how could have they issued a warrant for violation? How could have they arrested her for that violation, which they did.
 
But she was ARRESTED.

Here it is from the DMV of MO. . .

If you're caught driving without your insurance card, you can be ticketed, although you can usually have your ticket overturned if you present the court proof that you were insured at the time of citation.

Read more: DMV State Laws in Missouri | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/list_6826997_dmv-state-laws-missouri.html#ixzz1pXJ9ozdM

They do not arrest you for driving without insurance. DB was ARRESTED.

No offense, but I don't consider "ehow" definitive word on Missouri law.

I am not sure why you are fixated on the word arrested.

But in Missouri if a state agency cites you for a misdemeanor you are arrested. Ticketed, arrested, it's THE SAME THING. So yes, you are arrested for driving without insurance if you are busted by the Missouri Highway Patrol or Jackson County Sheriff's Office as opposed to the Independence Police Department or Lee's Summit Police Department.

I tell you what....call the Missouri Highway Patrol in Lee's Summit right now and ask them.
 
But she was arrested for failure to appear for this case.

Failure to appear for what? Her probation violation hearing.

ETA- and that was the second time she was arrested. What was the reason she was arrested the first time?
 
Failure to appear for what? Her probation violation hearing.
yes. Look at the docket. It clearly shows that she didn't do something for her terms of probation and they made a court date for her side to be heard for the reason why she had a violation. She failed to show and an arrest warrant was then made. This is when it shows an arrest - for the failure to appear.
 
Failure to appear for what? Her probation violation hearing.

ETA- and that was the second time she was arrested. What was the reason she was arrested the first time?

Because Missouri Highway Patrol, a state agency which means it falls under Missouri state law not a local city charter and thus city ordinance, pulled her over and asked for her license, registration and insurance card.

She had a license (or at least she wasn't cited for not having one so guess she has been licensed at some point in some state) but didn't have registration and proof of insurance.

She may not have been put in handcuffs. She may not have spent the night in the Lee's Summit Police Department. But when she was handed two traffic tickets for violating state law she was "arrested."
 
Failure to appear for what? Her probation violation hearing.

ETA- and that was the second time she was arrested. What was the reason she was arrested the first time?
Where is it ever listed as her being arrested any other time? It does not.
 
Failure to appear for what? Her probation violation hearing.

ETA- and that was the second time she was arrested. What was the reason she was arrested the first time?

I'm not seeing any arrests here. I see some warrants issued and served. Is that what you call an arrest?
 
No offense, but I don't consider "ehow" definitive word on Missouri law.

I am not sure why you are fixated on the word arrested.

But in Missouri if a state agency cites you for a misdemeanor you are arrested. Ticketed, arrested, it's THE SAME THING. So yes, you are arrested for driving without insurance if you are busted by the Missouri Highway Patrol or Jackson County Sheriff's Office as opposed to the Independence Police Department or Lee's Summit Police Department.

I tell you what....call the Missouri Highway Patrol in Lee's Summit right now and ask them.

Thank you. I just did. I was told that "sometimes" it may show up as an arrest, but that is not always the case. I specifically asked about probation and driving without tabs and insurance and was told, "No, someone would not get a one year probation for that. Well, if it was habitual maybe. Like if they had several of those the judge might do that, but not on the first offense."
 
Thank you. I just did. I was told that "sometimes" it may show up as an arrest, but that is not always the case. I specifically asked about probation and driving without tabs and insurance and was told, "No, someone would not get a one year probation for that. Well, if it was habitual maybe. Like if they had several of those the judge might do that, but not on the first offense."
This could also apply if she could not show proof that she ever had insurance, as in not just a lapse in coverage, but a blatant disregard for not having insurance. She might have very well ran her mouth with her known lack of filter and said something stupid like she never had insurance. This could have set a judge off. (Much like it could have been exactly the kind of thing that set LE off in the first place when they were called for the baby being missing - her lack of filter.)
 
there are TWO failure to appears... 2 warrants = 2 arrests?

plus, it states her probation ended 03/01/2010... about a year from 02/19/2009

03/01/2010 Record of Traffic Disp Amended

Hearing Held
Scheduled For: 03/01/2010; 9:30 AM ; JEFFREY LYNN BUSHUR; Independence Criminal/Traffic

Order to Revoke Probation

Defendant Sentenced FINE AMOUNT TOTAL - 250
 
I'm not seeing any arrests here. I see some warrants issued and served. Is that what you call an arrest?

She had an arraignment on 1/15/2009. That means she was criminally charged.
 
Thank you. I just did. I was told that "sometimes" it may show up as an arrest, but that is not always the case. I specifically asked about probation and driving without tabs and insurance and was told, "No, someone would not get a one year probation for that. Well, if it was habitual maybe. Like if they had several of those the judge might do that, but not on the first offense."

She paid a $250 fine. Whatever she did, she didn't get a DUI or DWI as you suggested. A DUI or DWI fine is typically higher.

Sentence: Fine
Sentence Date: 03/01/2010 Start Date: 03/01/2010 Fine: $250.00
Text: SIS PROBATION REVOKED**********DFT FINED $250

http://dor.mo.gov/drivers/dwiinfo.php
 
She paid a $250 fine. Whatever she did, she didn't get a DUI or DWI as you suggested. A DUI or DWI fine is typically higher.

Sentence: Fine
Sentence Date: 03/01/2010 Start Date: 03/01/2010 Fine: $250.00
Text: SIS PROBATION REVOKED**********DFT FINED $250

http://dor.mo.gov/drivers/dwiinfo.php
BBM Especially if it was a dui/dwi with a failure to appear and probation violations attached! Independence MO is not known for lax sentencing, either. Especially Judge Bushur from what I have been told!
 
She had an arraignment on 1/15/2009. That means she was criminally charged.

Correct. And the charges were 303.025 which is the financial responsibility charge. A misdemeanor charge.
 
She paid a $250 fine. Whatever she did, she didn't get a DUI or DWI as you suggested. A DUI or DWI fine is typically higher.

Sentence: Fine
Sentence Date: 03/01/2010 Start Date: 03/01/2010 Fine: $250.00
Text: SIS PROBATION REVOKED**********DFT FINED $250

http://dor.mo.gov/drivers/dwiinfo.php

That in no way implies that that is what she was arrested for. What was her arraignment for on 1/15/2009? They don't lock people up for driving without tabs and insurance in MO. She was locked up. . .and then arraigned, hearings were scheduled and probation was ordered. She violated the terms of her probation, a warrant was issued and she was arrested and bailed out.
 
if she hasn't paid the $250 fine, is that why she wouldn't have a drvs license?

The last entry says her bond was refunded on March 2. I don't think that would have occurred if she hadn't paid the $250 fine. I imagine she had to pay the $250 fine on March 1 before she could leave the courtroom.

I've been in Judge Bushur's courtroom (thankfully not as a defendant but as an observer) and he's pretty no nonsense. I also know someone who had a run in with him and he didn't spare any prisoners either.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
235
Guests online
479
Total visitors
714

Forum statistics

Threads
625,779
Messages
18,509,689
Members
240,841
Latest member
womanofsteel69
Back
Top