HUGE QUESTION please answer

So the DNA found both in the underwear and waste band of the long johns came from the same factory and was handled by the same person? If so, he must be a POI. They have clearly stated the DNA in question does not belong to a current POI or the family.

Yes, I have read a couple of books about this case and have never seen anything definitive about the underwear.

There have been multiple theories over the years, including in books by various investigators over the years.

Can you please link a source connecting the DNA found on her underwear being linked to the factory man and what LE has said about that in the current investigation? I'm surprised they would reveal a detail like that since it is an active investigation.

Whatever was used to wipe down JonBenet has never been identified and likely never will be. This raises all kinds of questions about transfer.
I don't think it matters what they do. It's my opinion that this case will never be solved.
 
Hey DeDee

Thanks for your reply, its awesome to be chatting to people with so much knowledge on the case , I wished I'd joined sooner! :)

As I mentioned to UKGuy, each time you think you've worked out what occurred, there's peices that just don't quite fit, obviously all the staging creates some smoke and mirrors.

When I read Steve Thomas's book, I was speechless. The dictionary was a shocker!, The question is... who opened the dictionary to that page and dog eared it? Did P do so to leave a non verbal message to say she knew what was going on to the person? Or was a child looking up a word they'd heard a parent discussing ( discussing a situation going on) although I don't see a child dog earring the page. Or was it a friend in the house that morning who was trying to leave a message for the police?
The Diane Hollis story certainly fits into this scenario and makes alot sense. Also it explains why both parents were so oddly apart from each other that morning and barely spoke according to witnesses. Even the victim support thought the parents were separated. Although if it was bdi, j could of been angry with p for not seeking more help for B if things had been going on leading up to this and people such as Linda the house keeper said she caught them playing doctors and nurses. Then there's that strange 9 11 call days prior that Susan took care of at the door and didn't let police come in? Would love to hear more of your thoughts on this case DeDee :)
I have a theory about the dictionary. If the kids were caught playing doctor more than a couple of times, I see a parental reprimand and lecture taking place. The word incest may have been used. I can see a 9-10 year old kid not being familiar with the word and looking it up. I don't necessarily agree that kids don't dog ear pages... I definitely did where as my son never would defile a book that way. Could BR dog eared the book due to the sexual content? He was obviously curious if the housekeepers story is accurate.

These are just theories not fact.
 
So the DNA found both in the underwear and waste band of the long johns came from the same factory and was handled by the same person? If so, he must be a POI. They have clearly stated the DNA in question does not belong to a current POI or the family.

Yes, I have read a couple of books about this case and have never seen anything definitive about the underwear.

There have been multiple theories over the years, including in books by various investigators over the years.

Can you please link a source connecting the DNA found on her underwear being linked to the factory man and what LE has said about that in the current investigation? I'm surprised they would reveal a detail like that since it is an active investigation.
MsBetsy,
I believe this is what you are seeking:
Research in your browser: Bode report on Jonbenet Ramsey long johns. There you will find your answer.
 
MsBetsy,
I believe this is what you are seeking:
Research in your browser: Bode report on Jonbenet Ramsey long johns. There you will find your answer.
A Paula Woodward link comes up. Many of us do not consider her a credible source, even though she claimed to have been given access to a stunning amount of evidence not disclosed to the public.
 
A Paula Woodward link comes up. Many of us do not consider her a credible source, even though she claimed to have been given access to a stunning amount of evidence not disclosed to the public.
1708882277162.jpeg
 
A Paula Woodward link comes up. Many of us do not consider her a credible source, even though she claimed to have been given access to a stunning amount of evidence not disclosed to the public.
1708882318257.jpeg

A Paula Woodward link comes up. Many of us do not consider her a credible source, even though she claimed to have been given access to a stunning amount of evidence not disclosed to the public.
1708882367487.jpeg
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
149
Guests online
638
Total visitors
787

Forum statistics

Threads
627,063
Messages
18,537,204
Members
241,171
Latest member
justicefornoah
Back
Top