I've been kinda avoiding this thread because those folks who decry politcally motivated prosecutions - well, for me, this is such a case. I have aboslutely no problem with any Democrat being held to full account for criminal wrongdoing but this case has always struck me as a conviction in search of a prosecution. There is sometimes such an overcorrection to proclaim or pretend non-bias that itself becomes bias. I believe that's what's happened here. Garland is sensitive to criticism that he's treating one side of the political aisle differently even when doing so is logical, just and reasonable. There's a score of lawyers out there who have stated publicly that people without the last name Biden wouldn't be indicted let alone taken to trial on these charges. JMO and FWIW
The likely imminent indictment of the president’s son is what happens when prosecutors cast about for something, anything, to charge.
www.thedailybeast.com
---------
Please note my opinion is based on just these two charges - if they do actually have 'real' crimes to charge him with, said opinion may well change. But I'm very skeptical there's any there there after a 5 year investigation and a failed plea deal.