- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
- Messages
- 48,238
- Reaction score
- 128,553
LE did state early on that (Evansdale) RSOs were cleared. If an offender was living in Evansdale and was not registered, that person would not be a Registered Sex Offender in Evansdale. LE would have been unaware that a sex offender who was supposed to register with them was living in Evansdale so that person would not have been cleared as an RSO. LE's statement that the RSOs had been cleared would not have included anyone who was not required to register nor anyone who might be a sex offender but has not been caught. I've never gotten the feeling that anyone felt this case could not be a sexually-motivated crime based upoon some RSOs being cleared. Rather, I believe people may have eliminated the Registered SOs withinin Evansdale as being the perp.
I am not arguing that LE has probably spoken to and checked out every single SO who was registered in Evansdale. What I am saying is that people who keep throwing that fact out to dispute any and all theories which involve a predator or a SO being responsible do not take into account the facts you outline above. I have had posters debate my theory using that logic.