GrainneDhu
Verified Expert
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2010
- Messages
- 5,159
- Reaction score
- 58
Still ,going on the same theory here . Misty saying she knows the girls are not at the lake.
Even if the bikes were dropped their by an abductor ,how would Misty still be so sure the Abductor didnt drop the girls off at or in the lake? The girls would have had to been with the Abductor and the bikes to so wouldnt you want to search the lake because of the bikes and the purse? How does Misty presume to know the girls are not there and know they are not at the lake.
My kids have been looked for in my house places I know within reason he could not be, yet I check them anyway to be sure.
I think that Misty is going on the facts that the lake has already been searched via one type of sonar, divers, it has been dragged, no shoes were found (including flip flops that come off easily and float) and LE was saying even as they drained the lake that they were sure the girls were not in it. And nothing has come to the surface yet, even though it has been hot and the water temps are well over the point where a body would surface.
And I'm sure she's very aware of the clocking ticking on...