- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
- Messages
- 12,603
- Reaction score
- 165,644
DBM--Late to the party as usual. At least 6 other posts before mine showing the JeepUnless it's behind the police car I'm not seeing the jeep. This is from an article posted 11/16. It seems like it took LE awhile to tow the cars away. It seems like I remember seeing it towed. Not sure anymore. JMO
4 Idaho college students killed in 'targeted attack,' no suspects in custody
I think Attorney LaBar did a good job in representing BK as a public defender during the PA extradition period. He did what defense attorneys do to represent the best interests of their clients. JMO.It was BK that used it. Thought it odd as well.
…
“It is a little out of character. He said this is not him,” LaBar said on NBC. “He believes he’s going to be exonerated. That’s what he believes. Those were his words. So he’s really been very easy to talk to, actually, and he’s in a calm demeanor.”
![]()
Lawyer: Suspect in University of Idaho slayings believes he’ll be exonerated
The suspect accused of fatally stabbing four University of Idaho students believes he’ll be exonerated, his attorney told NBC. Jason LaBar, the public defender representing Bryan Kohberger, said on…thehill.com
Here is the aerial view with source link. His Jeep is off to the left.Unless it's behind the police car I'm not seeing the jeep. This is from an article posted 11/16. It seems like it took LE awhile to tow the cars away. It seems like I remember seeing it towed. Not sure anymore. JMO
4 Idaho college students killed in 'targeted attack,' no suspects in custody
To get rid of the knifeOne thing I don’t get is why he turns his phone off for 5 hours heading towards Johnson? He left it on to go back to 1122k on the 13th at 9am. Why turn it off. What's he doing for 5 hours? Why would he need to conceal his footprint the day after for so many hours.
Curiosity…kills the…yup. He knows he is sinking fast, with every exhale - that grip tightens. They probably have a lot more evidence and facts than most everyone presumes. I’m waiting for the floodgates to open. JMOOHis curiosity got the better of him. "How did I get caught? What did I overlook?" After he sees the paperwork Oh wow. I'm in deep #%^&! JMO
Absolutely. He had it in his hand after wiping it off on a sheet or a piece of clothing on a victim. As he exited X’s bedroom he would be arching to the right all the way around the corner, down the step in front of DM’s room, and out the sliders. DM was fixated on his face, eyebrows. I do not believe they ever locked eyes - or he would have struck again. She is fortunate for primal instincts. JMOOI think it’s believable that he did just walk out with the knife in his hand. He seems to be right handed, (judging by the papers he signed at his PA extradition hearing.)
If he held it in his right hand, by his side or leg, his body would have blocked it from the roommate’s sight—and she seems to have been looking at his face, anyway, to notice his eyebrows. She might not even have looked down.
MOO
Logic says he had a very limited area to hide it if he didn't have it in his car when he fled the scene. It would be somewhere between Xana's room and where his car was parked. JMODoes anyone think there is absolutely anyway possible the knife could still be somewhere in the house? I don't, but stranger things have happened. I wonder if DM noticed it in his hand when she saw him. Completely understandable if not. JMO
MOO it really doesn't matter how they identified the car or what model years they were told to look for by the FBI. What they have is a car at and near the scene, that matches the appearance of a car that belongs to him, moving around to the same locations as a phone that belongs to him. Then the very very very strange coincidence of a sheath from a knife that (in all likelihood) killed a bunch of people, next to one of said people, with DNA on it that matches his. Finding the car could have been dumb luck for all it matters, the most important thing is that it led to someone whose DNA matched the DNA found at the scene, and clued them in to looking for a car that was his on security video.MOO Then LE should have said 2011-2016...but they didn't. You are right there were changes to the front and rear ends and other visible changes. So by LE only searching for the unchanged version it would indicate that they were sure of the vehicles year (body style) of the car but they conveniently changed it to match their suspects Elantra
I see that as reasonable doubt not an attempt to insult the intelligence of the jury. IMO
Not the case. The more urban an area gets the less range the tower will cover.But I think the towers cover miles and miles; not just an area close to the house. But I could be wrong.
I didn't reply to this at first, but I think it's really important. We walk a line as parents and want our kids to be kind and responsible people but also feel confident navigating an unpredictable and sometimes dangerous world. I will just share that not too long ago, when kids with disabilities were separated from their peers, exposure to kids who talked "funny" or not at all (because they were deaf, for example), or kids who did not know to take turns when playing games and didn't seem to acknowledge their playmates when playing games (who might now be dx on the autism spectrum) was limited. So when "normal" kids came across them, the unusual kid seemed weird and make the "normal" kid feel uncomfortable. Perfectly natural. With time, education, and acceptance, more and more of the "normal" kids understand the challenges that other kids face and understand how to interact with them.I would want my kid to trust their gut.
EDITED: The first article from News Nation, to claim this information, which I don't find credible, does not quote the "inmate" as reporting to having the above conversation.When the 28-year-old Ph.D. student was asked why he had been in Moscow – an eight-mile drive from his apartment in Pullman, Washington – he allegedly retorted, "The shopping is better in Idaho."
The PA public defender did not state this as his position, he quoted BK as saying he wanted to return to Idaho and be exonerated.In this case, it’d be ‘wrongfully accused and then exonerated. However, defense attorneys are prone to wishful thinking, in public, at least!
MOO
for 5 hours?To get rid of the knife
Right, that is what I meant by visible injuries. I was mainly referring to the idea that injuries can be seen on BKs hands in the traffic stop footage.While I agree HIPAA Receptionist would probably have blabbed about anything she noticed, I don't think we can assume he had no injuries. I just went to my GP. I didn't disrobe. Nobody pulled up my sleeves and they took my BP on top of my long sleeve sweater. Unless I had a big bandage on my hand, visible stitches or a gnarly looking visible bruise, I don't think either my doctor or the nurse would have noticed a healing or almost healed injury.
This.![]()
Watch: Internet sleuths fill social media with theories and misinformation about Idaho killings | CNN
Would-be internet sleuths are filling social media with theories and misinformation surrounding the University of Idaho killings. CNN's Gary Tuchman reports.us.cnn.com
MOO Then LE should have said 2011-2016...but they didn't. You are right there were changes to the front and rear ends and other visible changes. So by LE only searching for the specific unchanged version it would indicate that they were sure of the vehicles year (body style) of the car but they conveniently changed it to match their suspects Elantra
I see that as showing reasonable doubt not an attempt to insult the intelligence of the jury. IMO
I suspect he DID wield it all the way back to his car, in case he encountered someone else along the way.Here's what I have been wondering. Where did he put the knife when he was done? Obviously, he didn't put it back in the sheath. Was he holding it when DM saw him? If not, where did he put it? I'm guessing that he did not walk out of the house with it still in his hand. MOO
As you say definitely worth reading, What is scary is some of those confessed murderers who were never discovered. Scary thought isn't it?Very well written and well thought out article, providing his own expert opinion (one of many, but well articulated with context and data that he uses to form his opinions).
As a criminology professor, he focuses on some key questions related to BK's choice of discipline to study. He asks (my paraphre of his remarks) -
"Was his (BK's) passion for studying criminology a cause or an effect (of having a murderous mind)" (that is, did BK choose to study criinology because he already had a murderous mind? or was his murderous mind the result (effect) of studying serial, mass and spree killers)
"Did he (BK) become obsessed and aspire to join their ranks (BTK and Bundy)"
Definitely worth reading the entire article, IMO.