Just to be clear — I was only sharing what I heard AT allude to in hearing. I don’t believe there was anyone else except BK and my opinion is based on evidence we have knowledge of right now. It doesn’t sound like defense will offer anything to the contrary and I’m expecting the state to only build an even stronger case with more evidence! MOO. MOO. MOO!
www.nwpb.org
This just isn't how crimes like that happen. They're loud, they're messy, they're brazen; someone walks in with a gun and starts shooting. These victims don't come remotely close to matching any profile of victims in an organized crime attack.
There has been zero evidence presented and absolutely no credible mention of any organized crime/drug world linkage to this case., to my knowledge. None. I didn't realize that Howard Blum was part of the defense team. Will he be sharing this evidence with the court, or must we buy his book in order to learn of it? JMO
This explains a lot to me, because I've long felt that in my 5 and a half years of university classes, I had multiple professors who I believe had some degree of autism. And now that I think about it, probably one TA as well!
Oh I’m sure she’ll still ask Ballance, as the worst case scenario is she gets the same answer she already has (they weren’t able to get those records).
Howard Blum wrote in his book that he believes BK did it and that he acted alone. That it was not a transactional or pragmatic crime. That he had crossed paths with MM and she was the target.
And as for this "other potential suspect,"
AT said she needs more time to view discovery, Judge was not happy about that.
Judge just called AT out. Reminding her she asked for a delay, which he granted, so why are they waiting until NOW to do this?
AT said they haven't had time to look at discovery.
She whined that there was hundreds of hours of street traffic to look through, and it wasn't all labeled w/specifics, so she has to try and look at each one to see when and where...
And I think she had expected the state to have looked at each one and put a label with date and location.
Hippler reminded AT she had taken on a new DP case since this one began - he asked why she would take this additional case on when she was already overwhelmed with BK’s. Ouch!!
I'm not going to argue there haven't been delays, some of which probably could have been avoided. But in any US jurisdiction these days, I don't think high-profile, multiple murder, death penalty cases are on a rocket docket. Although I don't have the statistics to prove it, personally I doubt very many cases falling into all of the above 3 categories are tried within a year.
Oh, ok. I didn't realize that's what you meant by comparing BK's case to those in different "jurisdictions." I'd assume our US Constitution differs from others though resulting in different "rules." And as such, motions WILL differ as likely will the number of motions.
No need to be sorry Lets, the ID's found in the PA SW could have held some potential associated to the case or LE would not have confiscated them to begin with. We don't know exactly what they were except ID's found (hidden) in a glove inside of a box.Since this “clue” doesn’t seem to have taken root (I can find nothing recent except Coffindaffer’s brief reference two days ago), I am thinking it must not have much merit, or been an erroneous extrapolation of the PA home search warrant.
Sorry to have gotten so excited!
More than one, and IIRC I want to say 10 or maybe even a dozen. JMO
Do they have the death penalty in the UK? I was under the impression they don't. A DP case always moves more slowly. (And certainly should IMO.)
Mysterious. MOO The searchers would not bother taking a stack of his own old IDs.
And bye bye Bry
