- Joined
- Nov 29, 2022
- Messages
- 12
- Reaction score
- 63
Didn't LE state that only one knife was used? The killer was counting on the element of surprise, attacking the victims when they were the most vulnerable - in their sleep.
Didn't LE state that only one knife was used? The killer was counting on the element of surprise, attacking the victims when they were the most vulnerable - in their sleep.
Totally agree with this theory. Imo, the girls on the first floor weren’t bothered because the unsub was after one or both of the girls on the third floor. I also agree Ethan was a threat somehow, whether he went to investigate the noise or some other scenario, he was only killed because he got in the way. Once Ethan was killed, he then had to kill Xana, I don’t think E or X were specific targets.I believe that there was only one target and here’s why: It’s not super uncommon for girls of this age to sleep in the sand bed in a non sexual manner, especially when coming back from the bars; I know plenty of pairs of girls that lived together in college that would do this. When you factor in that KG was graduating early and getting ready to leave it wouldn’t surprise me if they were in the same room. Especially when you look at the fact that they both called the ex boyfriend. Perp walks in the sliding glass doors in the back, up the stairs to whichever girls room was the target, finds both MM and KG, stabs them both, as perp is walking back downstairs, EC hears the disturbance and confronts them, he’s murdered, <modsnip: rumor>, and XK is stabbed as well as she witnessed EC’s murder. This explains the girls downstairs being spared as well. Just my opinion
He was also asked about the surviving roommates calling about an unconscious person and mentioned they reached out to the girls via text and calling and it wasn’t like them (the victims) to not answer. That makes me think the survivors may not have seen anything or any deceased person but that the rooms were locked and they weren’t getting responses MOOAt the 1:00 minute mark:
According to the father SG, "it was fast, nobody suffered, nobody felt like that kind of pain".
This is an interesting comment to me, suggesting the killer was in and out quickly and didn't linger on the victims or the scene.
MOO
That would make sense seeing how the killings started within a few minutes after K's last phone call to J but still something tells me thats not the casegood chance the perp was waiting in the house all day. or multiple days to avoid being on camera. <modsnip>
No, the original post claimed the girls were on probation
Post in thread 'ID - 4 University of Idaho Students Murdered - Moscow # 15'
ID - 4 University of Idaho Students Murdered - Moscow # 15
Could someone please provide the link to the information that one of the victims was on probation at their sorority?
TIA.
I don't believe anyone has said that. It was the sororities themselves that were on probation, not the individual members and not the victims or survivors on Kings Road.
One interesting thing I found was when she said she would sometimes cut through the house’s back parking lot as a short cut to go to class. She lives in a house somewhere behind the King Rd house.![]()
Idaho coed murders: Sorority sister recalls victim's hours before tragedy, 'a normal night in Moscow'
University of Idaho students Ethan Chapin, 20; Kaylee Goncalves, 21; Xana Kernodle, 20; and 21-year-old Madison Mogen were stabbed several times and killed on November 13www.foxnews.com
A sorority sister provides some intel here
Forensic experts help me, with all that carnage especially in the hallway, there has to some of the perps DNA left at scene. My opinion I'm confident LE has perps DNA.
Walking through that house would shake me to the core as an LE investigator.
I had only seen that a private party drove them home. Could you provide a link to this info? Thanks.A designated driver from the university drove the girls home.
We talk a lot about who was targeted; all or one? When were they targeted? Why?I agree with the emboldened. The idea that the attack was targeted bothers me.
If you're after one person, it makes more sense to wait and catch that person alone, whether at home or when they're out and about. JMOO But, risking exposure by killing the target in a situation whereby you have to kill all four seems way too risky.
Unless all four were the targets, but that seems unlikely.
K’s dad mentions in this video it was a designated driver through a sorority. Dad of slain Idaho student pleads with public for help: 'I have to have my justice'I had only seen that a private party drove them home. Could you provide a link to this info? Thanks.
I had only seen that a private party drove them home. Could you provide a link to this info? Thanks.
I share the same opinionTotally agree with this theory. Imo, the girls on the first floor weren’t bothered because the unsub was after one or both of the girls on the third floor. I also agree Ethan was a threat somehow, whether he went to investigate the noise or some other scenario, he was killed because he got in the way. Once Ethan was killed, he then had to kill Xana, I don’t think E or X were specific targets.
All of the above in my opinion only
Sure. Obviously a stab wound to the heart would kill immediately, but even if the murderer did not manage to locate the heart precisely, then if he stabbed the chest above it , there is a major chance he would hit the thoracic aorta, what would cause massive bleeding and basically instant death. If the murderer hit the abdomen, directly under the heart, then there is the abdominal aorta, the biggest blood vessel in the body. Rupture to it also causes very very quick death.Depending on the target location, could a single stab wound kill someone?
I feel this is most likely a simple misunderstanding, imo. Someone misstating/misunderstanding the sorority’s university probation as the victim’s personal probation status within the sorority. Or simply heard “sorority probation” and that the girls weren’t actively involved atm & misconstrued. Not necessarily the WS poster, but wherever the info originated.Ah, good point. I have never seen that.
This is what I think happened. IMO.Has there been confirmation that the survivors "saw" someone passed out, or if they had just "assumed" someone was passed out due to other circumstances (not answering a knocked door, not answering texts, etc.)?
Also from article:
Goncalves said the students died quickly and did not bleed for hours, so an earlier 911 call would not have saved their lives.
"Nobody suffered and nobody felt like that kind of pain," Goncalves said.
Would they actually be able to determine based on the autopsy and the crime scene that no one suffered or felt “that kind” of pain? Maybe because he said they died quickly that he’s assuming they didn’t suffer or feel much pain? Or I wonder if he was specifically told that? I guess depending on where the wounds were, it could have been an almost instantaneous death (i.e. heart).