i have more than once thought the killer is lurking around forums such as this to get his kicks! Its not unheard of. thanks for linkLots of people are speculating right now, but if you're really interested in trying to make a difference in this case at this point, I recommend going on your own and scouring the social medias for suspicious, short comments from anonymous users. If you find suspicious profiles, go to fbi.gov/moscowidaho and report the info with screenshots and links.
Any knife requiring a sheath or does not fold into the handle.Could someone please clarify meaning of 'fixed blade' , please?
Would it be something like a bread knife or a cleaver?
Agree. I can't figure this out either. I do recall in early reports, the neighbor was quoted saying that one roommate DID say that she heard noises but did nothing, was distraught etc.. It was immediately after the bodies were discovered. I will see if I can find that article.
There have been sources of strange noises in my home. One source that baffled my hubby was a live kitten rescue stream that I watch. There is banging and "screaming". Hubby couldn't figure it out and thought someone was breaking into the house. The video played for hours while I was asleep and he was going about his daily routine. It was on my computer, but he couldn't see it.I’m not sure there was a lot of “commotion”. The bottom floor, where it seems the surviving roommates lived, was offset from the upper floors. Supposedly, they were in their rooms, maybe sleeping or trying to. They lived in a “party house”. People were always coming and going, and there was always lots of noise. Unless there was loud screaming, I don’t think they would consider most noise as unusual. Furthermore, having had college kids myself as well as nieces and nephews, it was not unusual for them to sleep ‘til noon or after whenever they got the chance. I know a lot of folks think that this is unusual, but it doesn’t surprise me at all.
I can pretty much guarantee the killer is lurking around these forums and socials. The speculation and discussion of how "horrific" it is, is most likely giving this person a lot of satisfaction.i have more than once thought the killer is lurking around forums such as this to get his kicks! Its not unheard of. thanks for link
I thought about a young juvenile as well or young person doing thisWell that is just about every Juvenile in Idaho according to my analysis lol.
The same way we do...wild speculation! At this point, anyone's specualtion is as good as anyone else's.
IMO, those seemingly inconsequential details are incredibly important to unlocking a bigger picture, like a puzzle piece that helps make the puzzle take shape.My theory still remains the same days after I originally posted it- this was done by someone the girls knew (either really well OR just very casually in passing). This wasn’t the work of a sophisticated serial killer or efficient murderer trained in the military. This was sloppy and careless, fueled solely by emotions such as jealousy, anger, and pure rage. The crime scene investigators have said the scene was very sloppy with tons of evidence left. The longtime FBI profiler also agrees. None of the facts as we know them line up with a well-prepared and trained serial killer. They instead point towards a more immature individual who was more concerned with exacting revenge and brutality than not potentially getting caught or hurt.
A military trained killer would have killed with precision, not multiple haphazard and angry slashes and stabs to the torso. That many stabs indicates someone who has zero anger/rage control. Military assassins are disciplined and efficient killing machines.
And serial killers almost always have a signature or calling card MO. Most involve luring or tricking victims into close contact with them so that they can abduct and/or torture their victims. Most serial killers aren’t into rage killing houseloads of victims. I’m aware it’s happened before, so it wouldn’t be unheard of. But it’s just incredibly rare. A serial killer could strike any time he wanted to do so. But some vengeful and scorned incel wanting to punish Kaylee might have had no other choice than to murder her that night before she moved back in with her parents and out of state for good.
Maybe I’m just a boring and unimaginative slave to statistics, but I keep going back to the overwhelming percentage of murders being committed by someone acquainted with the victim.
Also, I think there are a few discussion points which others on here seem to find critical, but which I find completely inconsequential. For instance, the whole 911 call/unconscious person debate seems like a big nothing to me. There’s no way the roommates had anything to do with this. And there’s so many ways either they or their friends who made the 911 call could have used the phrase “unconscious”. Maybe it was the 911 operator who paraphrased that. Maybe the 911 operator asked them point blank if the person appeared conscious and they replied no. Maybe they didn’t even get a close look at their deceased roommates at first and just thought one or more were unconscious. There’s no malice or importance to the crime there, at least IMO.
And then there’s the dog. Kaylee’s dog survived. Not a big deal as it relates to the crime. Doesn’t necessarily signify anything at all. Pets survive murders all the time. Some dogs don’t bark at all. Most killers have no interest in killing a dog, especially if it’s just sitting there. If someone targeted one or more of the victims, the dog was not the aim of their rage. The killer murdered the object or objects of his rage, then killed anyone else he encountered who got in his way. Just like the girls downstairs shut up in their rooms, the dog posed no threat to him.
I’ll say lastly that so much seems to be focused on the inconsistencies and confusing statements coming from law enforcement. That really isn’t a surprise for three reasons: a) as investigations develop, theories change, b) law enforcement often says things and lies to confuse, frighten, or comfort the suspects, and c) much of what they’re saying seems confusing to us because we haven’t seen what they’ve seen (if we had walked the crime scene, seen the evidence, and talked to witnesses, a lot of our confusion to their statements and theories would be cleared up). I think it’s unfair to judge law enforcement’s inconsistent and sometimes illogical statements as proof they don’t know what they’re doing or have bungled the case. There is so, so much that not even the families have been told as of now that the police do know. I guarantee that there are very specific reasons they are saying what they’re saying.
If it were meticulous, I don’t think the killer would have left behind the copious amounts of evidence that he did. I know it’s all just speculation at this point, and you could be right. But rage killings don’t have to be loud, and amateurs can absolutely stab victims repeatedly without feeling a thing. As someone else pointed out, OJ Simpson did that very thing. He flew into a violent rage upon seeing his wife with another man and proceeded to mutilate and almost behead them on their front sidewalk. He was able to do so and slip away with no neighbors hearing anything but a dog barking. Inside a house with closed doors, I could easily see a sloppy rage-filled stabbing occurring with the roommates passed out two floors below and neighbors not hearing anything. Just MOO.
If it's true it was known as a party house The survivor's might have thought they were having friends over being loud and been irritated and tried to ignore it.Why would jump to the conclusion of murders?Agree. I can't figure this out either. I do recall in early reports, the neighbor was quoted saying that one roommate DID say that she heard noises but did nothing, was distraught etc.. It was immediately after the bodies were discovered. I will see if I can find that article.
I’m sure it’s possible. Even if the killer didn’t know them personally, he/she could find out all about them, their lives, friends, boyfriends, family, etc. etc. etc.I realize that these victims had a pretty big social media presence. Could someone from social media have had something to do with these murders. Was someone jealous, did someone feel slighted, or did some one become obsessed with them.
The article doesn't fit the headline. I read the article. It seems a bit clickbait because it didn't address the topic.