ID - Doomsday Cult Victims - Joshua Vallow - Tylee Ryan - Tammy Daybell - Charles Vallow - *Arrests* #68

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #461
  • #462
  • #463
I hope at least one WS member got a reserved seat for Monday!
 
  • #464
I must admit I was very disappointed when I read this portion of the Judge’s decision.

This makes it sound as (IMOO only) that the State not only had some responsibility under Idaho Code to submit this form pertaining to victims but they also were notified by the Court and the Clerk about this - yet they still failed to do.

Relevant sections I am quoting from the pages:

As a threshold issue, the Court notes that there is a procedure within the statute designed
to aid the Court in being notified of who the State contends is a victim. To date, and after an express request, the Clerk of the Court has still not received the form in this case, required by Idaho Code Section 19-5306(2), that indicates to the Court an individual is asserting their rights as a crime victim, thus invoking the rights afforded to crime victims under Idaho law as set forth in Idaho Code Section 19-5306 and the Idaho Constitution.


And
In sum, the Court is disappointed that the statutory form required under Idaho Code Section
19-53060) has not been provided to the Clerk of the Court in order to clearly identify and protect the rights of crime victims, their immediate families, and illuminate a need to designate representatives from the immediate family of victims in this case, which may have prevented much of the confusion surrounding this issue. The Court still requests that the State confirm who is asserting their status of Victim to comply with I.C. §l9-3506(2), and to keep the record clear on this issue.



Can anyone speculate as to why they didn’t do this? Makes me worried about how they’ll perform during trial next week. I worry of things like they’ll try to share something that wasn’t given to defense yet or was ruled to be excluded per the Judge. Feeling a bit disheartened at the moment :(
 
  • #465
  • #466
  • #467
I've admittedly gotten a bit lost in trying to keep up with following multiple recent trials. Will audio from each day of court be made available at some point in this trial? Last I remember, no video would be permitted.
 
  • #468
  • #469
good morning I can help with posting tweets by Nate Eaton and Justin Lum starting Monday
 
  • #470
good morning I can help with posting tweets by Nate Eaton and Justin Lum starting Monday

I believe they each got courtroom seats, so they will be inside the courtroom, which means no tweeting from them except at breaks. I assume there will be other reporters in the overflow room who will be tweeting.
 
  • #471
I believe they each got courtroom seats, so they will be inside the courtroom, which means no tweeting from them except at breaks. I assume there will be other reporters in the overflow room who will be tweeting.
thanks whoever it is I can help post the tweets here so we can all follow
 
  • #472
  • #473
  • #474
good morning I can help with posting tweets by Nate Eaton and Justin Lum starting Monday
Great idea to "call it" we don't want to crash the site with too many people posting the same information!
 
  • #475
Great idea to "call it" we don't want to crash the site with too many people posting the same information!
I assume we'll all be posting over the top of each other as we do every time we get excited lol. I'll be appreciating every update as I have a mountain of work next week to conquer. Blah.
 
  • #476
I believe they each got courtroom seats, so they will be inside the courtroom, which means no tweeting from them except at breaks. I assume there will be other reporters in the overflow room who will be tweeting.
I thought as long as they kept the sound off they can tweet with no audio or video? I'm probably confused.
 
  • #477
Extended interview with Larry

 
  • #478
 
  • #479
I believe they each got courtroom seats, so they will be inside the courtroom, which means no tweeting from them except at breaks. I assume there will be other reporters in the overflow room who will be tweeting.
IIRC there is no such restriction, as noted in a ruling by Boyce -- ie, in real time, at the trial anyone attending will be allowed to tweet (and even use a tablet or laptop or text on a phone) just so long as there is (a) no audio being recorded, and (b) no sounds come from the device.
 
  • #480
IIRC there is no such restriction, as noted in a ruling by Boyce -- ie, in real time, at the trial anyone attending will be allowed to tweet (and even use a tablet or laptop or text on a phone) just so long as there is (a) no audio being recorded, and (b) no sounds come from the device.
Here’s a link…

In the courtroom and even at the remote view locations, no recording devices of any kind are permitted. Cellphones must be turned off or kept on silent, and laptops can be used during the proceedings as long as their cameras and microphones are disabled.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
167
Guests online
1,316
Total visitors
1,483

Forum statistics

Threads
632,401
Messages
18,625,937
Members
243,135
Latest member
AgentMom
Back
Top