Even when she is on assignment for Law & Crime?
Wasn't she allowed during the Murdaugh trial?? IIRC there were lots of her reporting shared there. Maybe I'm wrong.
Even when she is on assignment for Law & Crime?
Wasn't she allowed during the Murdaugh trial?? IIRC there were lots of her posts shared there. Maybe I'm wrong.
Perhaps you are right-re Audrey 'bombshell'
2020?
So that's why Boyce allowed Def two cross exams of Audrey and refused State final re-direct
IMO, she didn't have the expertise to know about death certificates. Also, she possibly has primarily been around educators with relatively simple financial affairs to settle.Yeah, that insurance lady was a really BAD witness. She was there to say what was "usual" but had only settled 15 claims in total, ever.
She thought 3 DC's would have been too many, and somehow alarming, when instead it is far fewer than the norm. When my parents died, we were advised to get a dozen or more, each time, by funeral home advisors who do this every day. She was really testifying to her own ignorance, imo.
Is she ignorant, or biased? Either way, as a result, if I'm a juror I have to consider all her testimony of what is "usual" as garbage. And it makes me look side-eyed at the prosecutor who is trying to feed me testimony from someone like that, to prove something-or-other.
MOD NOTE:
Pretty Lies & Alibis is NOT an approved source here at Websleuths. If you are not sure if a source you are wanting to link is approved, please use the report feature on any post to ask a Mod or Admin prior to posting the link.
Thanks,
Mad
Yesterday I was thinking of everything they have against her and had a gut feeling that she is going to testify. I'd pay good money to watch if the court livestreamed it lol.
thanks. That is important backgroundDon’t forget they had to work on it after court yesterday. I think the prosecution turned this around amazingly quickly (which is worrying IMO). Also, the defence has had everything that is contained in the document since August 2021
Well, I don't think the quotes were inconsistent with the Lori we "know." Most recently, there is Lori's cousin Megan whose anecdotes align with this behavior. Basically, she said she's sweet until you cross her. And Megan did say she had just accused Lori of "something weird" afoot.I found her testimony strange but not necessarily not believable. In all other testimony and other things we've heard Lori uses a relatively small set of word, "dark," "possessed", etc. But AB quotes her saying "wrap satan in a taco and send him to Antarctica." That's just inconsistent with everything else. Same with the death threat - inconsistent. It could be that it is wrong or maybe Lori just saw AB as especially weak or impressionable and therefore treated her differently.
My theory is Charles was bleeding out too slowly and Alex was running out of time so he shot him again.Several posters have suggested that Lori may have fired the 2nd bullet into Charles.
Oh, she made threats. I wrote about it on another post.The Fifth Amendment protects you from being forced to testify if it would incriminate yourself. It does not confer a right not to testify because you are terrified of the accused. If people could choose for themselves whether to testify what would be the purpose of subpoenas?
Again, I don't think she is a bad person. I just don't give her much credibility. Lori's MO seems to be to label someone as dark then let Alex do his thing. Lori rarely made direct threats and even when she did they were always nonspecific.
and an admission ( AB says she admitted to her having been at the scene of somebody's last breaths, as well as outlined the method of one of her most heinous crimes including cutting, blood, bags and a clean up)Oh, she made threats. I wrote about it on another post.
MIO
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.