- Joined
- Jun 3, 2004
- Messages
- 28,753
- Reaction score
- 44,525
Yet most serial killers do torture animals starting out. I think it's practice.I think the Macdonald triad which, was from the 60s, has been largely unproven.
Triad of Evil
Yet most serial killers do torture animals starting out. I think it's practice.I think the Macdonald triad which, was from the 60s, has been largely unproven.
Triad of Evil
Interesting... because I have a harder time understanding British accents when watching TV programs.Excellent. Especially when using “BBC British,” they use their mouths and lips more than Americans tend to.
I have a theory about this and I don't think it will be popular.Chad texted Tammy that day saying he had started a fire to burn the "limb debris" and while doing so he shot and buried a raccoon in the pet cemetery. This is the first reported instance of a fire in the fire pit and it comes from Chad himself. Now why in the world would he feel the need to report to his wife about burning a fire in the fire pit that morning unless there would be evidence of an actual fire? MOO.
I've had many fires in fire pits when I lived on very similar property as CD. As far as stirring, you don't need to dig anything up again to stir. One reason to stir the fire is to gather any unburnt sticks, twigs, log ends, etc back into the middle of the fire to get it all burnt. It can be done with a rake while the fire is still smoldering or upon subsequent fires. There was certainly a possibility that certain parts could have easily and inadverently been moved around at some time or another.
The vertebrae parts were found buried but not very deep so they could have been moved. Besides, being smaller and surely charred, it could be difficult to differentiate them from wood pieces and he may not have noticed them within the debris. The mass of bones, tissue and bucket were deeper, thus not likely to be moved around.
I've had large bonfires when I had a lot to burn and many, many small fires, no bigger than a campfire to clean up smaller fallen debris. As far as timing, the neighbors may not have seen all the fires that went on. Perhaps there were smaller and less conspicuous fires at some point. Anything is possible.
MOO
Yes, I hadn't thought of that. But what about the singular piece across the mouth? Why bind the arms that way?One thing I have thought of is to prevent rigor mortis, where the jaw draws open. But I do tend to think he was subdued and suffocated.
It is my understanding that Idaho did not require the coroner to do an autopsy. And the coroner in Tammys county had no experience. Add to that, she knew the Daybell family. I don’t see that as corruption. I see it as total incompetence.Idaho needs to foot the bill for several additional lawyers for DA for the case, not supplying a first class prosecution for Tylee and JJ sake would forever shame Idaho.
The coroner, a trained EMT who allowed Tammy unexplained death to slide into the past without required questions already suggests a deep corruption in their system.
MOO justice and Mormonism should not be incompatible.
"Welcome to the Church of the Firstborn where everything's made up and the points don't matter." MOO.IF Tammy was declared a zombie yet after her death she "visited" her children and "helped" them from the other side of the veil (paraphrasing Chad), then she was rehabilitated. In contrast, Charles was never deemed a good guy after his death and we don't know what Lori's stance on her kids is now.
I don't know but I would think a divorce might help him if that were the case.I know this question comes a little late after the hearing but I was just watching a clip from a Court TV episode. The lawyers and journalists on the show (Vinny Politan, Ashley Banfield and Ted Rowlands) all believe Chad is going to blame all these deaths and conspiracies on Lori and he is going to throw her under the bus.
What are your opinions? I felt sure they would be tried together and plead not guilty all the way.
NBC has an app that lets you watch the show. I watched it last night.It was an older case about a guy named Lou Castro who convinced a mom of 2 young daughters, one 10 and one 17 years old, to join a commune in Wichita KS. He then systematically offed all the commune members by arranged "accidents" and slept with the young girls in order to keep his "visions" coming.
Not verbatim but it was my takeaway. His murders were pool drowning, car fell on mechanic, plane crash, car crash, etc.
Angel’s Landing Cult Leader Lou Castro Was Sentenced to Life in Prison | Heavy.com
I have a theory about this and I don't think it will be popular.
I do not think that Chad knew of any plan to kill Tylee. I suspect that either Alex or Lori turned up with Tylees body and he was in too deep to refuse. At that time, IMO, Tammy was Chads 'safe place' and IMO the text he sent Tammy was so out of the ordinary, it conveys his shock at what had happened. He needed to touch base with something real, to make sense of it (or not).
If you think about it logically, there was no reason to text Tammy at all. Chad didn't need to text her about the Racoon, nor burning the tree limbs and by the account of the FBI agent, this text and the content of it, was out of the ordinary. If Chad was normally Mr Chatty via text, then there would be similar text content on the phone.
What I don't understand, is the need to burn Tylee. I wonder who thought of that?
Nissan logos aren't oval, they are round and have the word Nissan across them. I know because we are a 3 Nissan family.The Nissan Rogue has an oval logo emblem on the front of the grill. I could easily see an officer seeing that from a distance and mistaking it for Subaru's oval logo emblem with the little stars inside, especially since a Rogue is about the same size as an Outback or Forester.
Good post. For a minute, I thought you were serious! Lol. I’m slow today.I don't know but I would think a divorce might help him if that were the case.
He still loved her so much on the day they unearthed the children's remains behind his house and didn't sound at all curious as to what this huge operation was about, or what they might be digging for.
The narrative I've picked up on so far is that -
He knew Alex better than he knew Lori - to account for Alex's cell phone pings at his house, why Chad was at the apartments so much, what he said to the officers.
MG is lying about them having an affair.
Alex didn't kill the children or come over to bury them - he loved JJ.
MG didn't like the children.
Anything DW heard about zombies was related to Chad's fiction writing because DW is hard of hearing.
Goodness knows what he will come up with for the burials - they were buried when Chad wasn't there - maybe when he was in Hawaii - perhaps DW buried them for MG when the neighbors saw the first bonfires?
All complete speculation of course
I have a theory about this and I don't think it will be popular.
I do not think that Chad knew of any plan to kill Tylee. I suspect that either Alex or Lori turned up with Tylees body and he was in too deep to refuse. At that time, IMO, Tammy was Chads 'safe place' and IMO the text he sent Tammy was so out of the ordinary, it conveys his shock at what had happened. He needed to touch base with something real, to make sense of it (or not).
If you think about it logically, there was no reason to text Tammy at all. Chad didn't need to text her about the Racoon, nor burning the tree limbs and by the account of the FBI agent, this text and the content of it, was out of the ordinary. If Chad was normally Mr Chatty via text, then there would be similar text content on the phone.
What I don't understand, is the need to burn Tylee. I wonder who thought of that?
So what did they burn in the fire pit? They had been there for some years, so must have had fires before (unless of course they had five years worth of tree limbs?).To me, there was a very good reason to text Tammy. He and his family had no history of burns on his yard. If a neighbor mentioned it to her, she may go out to her pet cemetery and investigate.
She loved animals and her sister said that was Tammys pet cemetery. Maybe she didn’t really want any raccoons buried there, much less burned with limbs.
So what if she goes out there to investigate and smells decomposing human flesh?
because DW testimony undermined MGs in some respects and therefore helpful to the defence.
SBBM - you say it so much better than me!That is exactly what I was thinking about the need for a safe harbor, Tammy! His need to confess, he needed her goodness.
It is my understanding that Idaho did not require the coroner to do an autopsy. And the coroner in Tammys county had no experience. Add to that, she knew the Daybell family. I don’t see that as corruption. I see it as total incompetence.
My whole issue with DW testimony is he obviously could not hear the questioning. He was behind plexiglass and had some listening device. He needed headphones. I have no problem with him, but under the circumstances his testimony needs to be laid aside or he needs special accommodations to testify . . . like a private session with attorneys present. Jmo
Maybe the piece across his mouth was to stop him from screaming.Yes, I hadn't thought of that. But what about the singular piece across the mouth? Why bind the arms that way?