- Joined
- Oct 19, 2016
- Messages
- 1,064
- Reaction score
- 7,002
Is it just me, or does it seem that many of the prime individuals involved in this case might share a radical belief in an end-times scenario in which divorce from a non-believer (or a not-radical-enough-believer) spouse is somehow an insufficient dissolution, especially when there exists a plan or requirement to remarry: that such a previous non-believing spouse must actually die.
And that based on this same shared radical belief, the subsequent remarriage of one radical-believer to another radical-believer may be more of a mandatory requirement (that must be carried out with haste?) of the belief system, rather than a union between two people who love each other.
I think (but am not sure) that in this case, all of the ex-spouses of radical-believers who then later quickly remarried other radical-believers, have either died (were possibly murdered) or survived a murder attempt. The list of those who died includes JR (he actually may or may not belong in this category), CV, TD, and even AC (I guess we should watch to see if ZP quickly remarries..). There may be others.
The murder attempt of course was on BB. But even in BB's case, following the attempt on his life in Oct. (a crime for which there is no evidence yet implicating his spouse/ex-spouse) there's perhaps evidence that MB was or is trying to track him down (after BB took his children and went into hiding, MB was arrested for trespassing at BB's parents farm). If indeed these incidents are not just coincidences, and if they perhaps are related to a radical-belief system similar to what I've described, IP's ex-spouse (who I believe has previously obtained a protection order against her husband) may also be in danger.
If there is something to this though, so far it seems to be strictly related to marriages - specifically those between a radical-believer and a non (or not-radical-enough) believer. There have been no similar "coincidental" events (that I have read about) which might indicate that other immediate family members could be in danger - unless you believe that Tylee and JJ's disappearance is suspicious in this same way (say, versus their being sent to a secret prepper/cult commune or something). Just an observation
And that based on this same shared radical belief, the subsequent remarriage of one radical-believer to another radical-believer may be more of a mandatory requirement (that must be carried out with haste?) of the belief system, rather than a union between two people who love each other.
I think (but am not sure) that in this case, all of the ex-spouses of radical-believers who then later quickly remarried other radical-believers, have either died (were possibly murdered) or survived a murder attempt. The list of those who died includes JR (he actually may or may not belong in this category), CV, TD, and even AC (I guess we should watch to see if ZP quickly remarries..). There may be others.
The murder attempt of course was on BB. But even in BB's case, following the attempt on his life in Oct. (a crime for which there is no evidence yet implicating his spouse/ex-spouse) there's perhaps evidence that MB was or is trying to track him down (after BB took his children and went into hiding, MB was arrested for trespassing at BB's parents farm). If indeed these incidents are not just coincidences, and if they perhaps are related to a radical-belief system similar to what I've described, IP's ex-spouse (who I believe has previously obtained a protection order against her husband) may also be in danger.
If there is something to this though, so far it seems to be strictly related to marriages - specifically those between a radical-believer and a non (or not-radical-enough) believer. There have been no similar "coincidental" events (that I have read about) which might indicate that other immediate family members could be in danger - unless you believe that Tylee and JJ's disappearance is suspicious in this same way (say, versus their being sent to a secret prepper/cult commune or something). Just an observation