An definitely had a MEAN tone.....don't try to grow a brain,you're not the only fact cat,victory
arrogant and mean if you ask me
why would PR have that tone if she wrote it? doesn't make any sense
John,John,John.....sounds more like implicating him than putting distance between him and what happened,if she wrote it as the cover-up why make it sound like the author knew her husband,that's not diverting attention, is it.
The more I read Cynic, the more I understand that the investigators were only looking at the Ramseys from the beginning (or even before JBR was found). A bit like the RDI's on this forum, they dismissed anything inconsistent with their theory and magnified anything vaguely incriminating.
That's what JR did.
JR: Well Im, its a lot of screaming going on around that, but we saw the note and read the first part. Ah, I think I might have run upstairs to look in JonBenets room. At one point I laid it on the floor and spread it out so I could read it real fast without having to sit and read it. At some point we checked Burke, I think I checked Burke. Patsy asked what should we do, and I said call the police, and she called 911.
TT: Patsy called 911 (inaudible).
I think it's what you call "panic".
Every male who was present at any time when Joni's body was transferred to the coroner, in the custody of the Boulder authorities, was present during any part of the autopsy and when any of her clothing was touched, removed, handled, examined after her murder should/must be tested for his DNA to rule out accidental/incidental contamination.
Yet, the Ramseys didn't know what/who they were dealing with in this situation and for them to invite friends over right away, disregarding the warning of those claiming to have their daughter, was a precarious decision.
The 911 call, plus the contemporary reaction of not complying with criminal demands, may have precluded these decisions. IOW what you're calling a precarious decision was more automatic, and I don't believe the RN author knew they would call 911 before they even read the note. Thats just how stupid the RN author is.
I think you're missing the point. I have been looking for ALL of THE possible paths for the genetic material of an unknown male to get to the inside crotch of JBR's underwear AND two (2) places on the longjohn waistband.
Present during autopsy isn't a path. Any of her clothing isn't a path either. Nobody yet has provided a clear path even once.
Do you mean something like, a male assistant to the coroner, or, the male coroner, while preparing the body for or performing the autopsy, came in contact with these items with his bare hands or sneezed or coughed without sterile protection, as a path?
I think I'm getting your position. It was automatic, most likely, IMO2. It wasn't wise, though, based on the warning of someone who held their daughter captive, you know?
It doesn't indicate they knew all along there was no threat. Combined with evidence that they were involved, this has probative value, certainly. Don't you think?
Probative value meaning that PR's 911 call seems to be more genuine panic and less acting, as acting would've been more compliant with the script they themselves wrote?
Do you mean something like, a male assistant to the coroner, or, the male coroner, while preparing the body for or performing the autopsy, came in contact with these items with his bare hands or sneezed or coughed without sterile protection, as a path?
Yes. I think that is why it may be an issue. As in, in a "real-life" kidnapping who would defy a kidnapper's instructions so swiftly and openly, by inviting friends over and calling the cops, with a "real" threat of death hanging over the victim?
Given the unsterile procedures used in clipping JB's nails, I'd say anything is possible. That clipper could even have been used on a previous body, without being sterilized in between.
I understand that RDI would like the path of the genetic material from the unknown male to JBR to be as vague as possible, thereby avoiding commitment to a flawed or less likely scenario than the prima facie scenario.
Hi MurriFlower.
PR: I don’t know. Just found a note a note and my daughter is missing
911: Does it say who took her?
PR: What?
911: Does it say who took her?
PR: No I don’t know it’s there...there is a ransom note here.
911: It’s a ransom note.
PR: It says S.B.T.C. Victory...please
When questioned, she was able to respond SBTC.
Where is this quote from please TP?
Your opinion, BUT that doesn't change the FACT that Mayer did not follow proper sterile procedures with the nail clipper.
Where is this quote from please TP?
Hi MurriFlower.
PR: I don’t know. Just found a note a note and my daughter is missing
911: Does it say who took her?
PR: What?
911: Does it say who took her?
PR: No I don’t know it’s there...there is a ransom note here.
911: It’s a ransom note.
PR: It says S.B.T.C. Victory...please
When questioned, she was able to respond SBTC.
