Woe.be.gone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2008
- Messages
- 13,022
- Reaction score
- 229
BBM
I don't know if for certain they did not find a skull so please do not come to that conclusion after reading my post. If you read my statement it says "I was trying to come up with a reason why LE might not have found a skull when they came across Antinette's remains." This was in response to watcher9's post about "I haven't heard yet if they actually found a skull. Maybe the perp kept it."
Yes you would certainly think that if a human skull was lying there as we know a human skull should look, LE would have certainly known the remains were that of a human and it wouldn't have taken a week or so before they announce they had found human remains. Which leads me to believe and others to I think speculate that the skull might be missing or at least the skull was not reconcilable as a human skull in the form which we think a human skull should look and that is why it took so long to announce they had found remains of a human.
But then again this is LE and they would look pretty incompetent if they were to announce that they had found human remains only to have to come back a few days later and say something like this "Opp's we made a mistake. We just heard back from the lab and it just so happens that the remains we said were human remains turned out to be that of some sort of dead animal. Sorry everyone for the mix up, the search is back on."
Can you imagine what everyone would be saying if that had happen. Skull or not LE is going to cross their T's and dot their I's.
Weren't they doing water searches AFTER they found the 'bones' but before they knew if they were human or not? So they continued the search regardless but it may mean they are/were still missing something. :waitasec: