IL - Child, 9, charged in fire deaths of 5 people, Goodfield, 6 Apr 2019

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #301
Thats EXACTLY where my mind went. I see it here in FL a LOT. Every child has some issue or another so they can get extra money each month.. and they keep popping out kids each year. My mind NOW is going to.... did she think she would get MORE money from Military for death? I have one tenant that uses the term 'retired' from death of her ex military husband and gets enough each month to not work. I don't think 'mom' is smart enough to know that they weren't married so i DOUBT spousal support happens, since both little ones are deceased too. I know i'm stretching but this is one very 'winding road' type of case.

No marriage, no check. Not even "common law". He was probably not 100% SC, because then, he would have definitely wanted marriage, every dependent is more cash. But if someone is only 30% SC, they don't get more money based on dependents. (Service Connected Disabled).
 
  • #302
Rosieposy - YouTube
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #303
  • #304
Thats EXACTLY where my mind went. I see it here in FL a LOT. Every child has some issue or another so they can get extra money each month.. and they keep popping out kids each year. My mind NOW is going to.... did she think she would get MORE money from Military for death? I have one tenant that uses the term 'retired' from death of her ex military husband and gets enough each month to not work. I don't think 'mom' is smart enough to know that they weren't married so i DOUBT spousal support happens, since both little ones are deceased too. I know i'm stretching but this is one very 'winding road' type of case.

Hmm. Actually your post makes me think she had the opposite of a monetary motive to want her kids and fiancé gone. Because she’s not eligible for survivor benefits. And with two kids gone she’s down to one SSI child’s payment (which now goes to foster care).

She’s probably on disability herself now though.
 
  • #305
No marriage, no check. Not even "common law". He was probably not 100% SC, because then, he would have definitely wanted marriage, every dependent is more cash. But if someone is only 30% SC, they don't get more money based on dependents. (Service Connected Disabled).

Maybe those children weren't supposed to die. MOO.
 
  • #306
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #307
I was just going to say same thing.. someone needs to download them.. i do not know how.
 
  • #308
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #309
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Aww he is so cute. That sounds like the mom wanted him to document abuse.
 
  • #310
  • #311
There are definitely some disconnects in the story. The kid would probably be better off in a treatment facility than with this particular Mother.

Of note, if the child receives SSI payments, those are given to the institution for the cost offset. And the parent of an institutionalized child, does not qualify for many entitlement programs that are tied to having a dependent child in the home. Which is why many parents do not send their children to residential schools for the blind or deaf, or other disabilities.
Kyle might not be with his mom, he is with a "relative" though.
 
  • #312
Who pushed the grandmother out of bed?
 
  • #313
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

As an aside can I just say kids these days are growing up in a narcissistic world in which everyone has to have a “channel” and do vlogs and sell “merch” (the kid actually talks about his “merch”, even if they have nothing interesting or funny or unique to say, not talent to display, no actual information to impart.

Andy Warhol was so right.
 
  • #314
  • #315
  • #316
As an aside can I just say kids these days are growing up in a narcissistic world in which everyone has to have a “channel” and do vlogs and sell “merch” (the kid actually talks about his “merch”, even if they have nothing interesting or funny or unique to say, not talent to display, no actual information to impart.

Andy Warhol was so right.

There are things devoted to other people playing video games. His mom should have checked this stuff.
 
  • #317
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #318
That’s what I was listening for. I couldn’t make it ou.

Kyle seemed more into the gross factor which makes sense on youtube they have doctor pimple popper and stuff.
 
  • #319
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #320
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
97
Guests online
2,390
Total visitors
2,487

Forum statistics

Threads
632,708
Messages
18,630,792
Members
243,266
Latest member
the calm man
Back
Top