Lanie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 16, 2007
- Messages
- 2,843
- Reaction score
- 38
I could not agree more.Maybe this needs a new thread...such as The State of Missouri VS. STUPID HUSBAND. (Or his real name!)
I could not agree more.Maybe this needs a new thread...such as The State of Missouri VS. STUPID HUSBAND. (Or his real name!)
And they let him go to the funeral before arresting him, so he could blubber like a victim himself, loosing his whole family.
Someone should of just shot him and saved the county a whole bunch of money. I'm sick of these sociopathic men, having children and loving wives and murdering the innocents.
And what the hell took so long to arrest him when everyone in the world knows he did it?
Glad to hear he was arrested too.
Thought this was interesting:
Friends say couple a study in contrasts
I certainly don't mean to say that I feel I need to be afraid of my mate, but these kinds of happenings always force me to look at our relationship, in contrast to others' marriages or how I perceive them to be. I always come away from the reading shrugging my shoulders thinking "that could be anyone". People are always described as any other couple I know, which creeps me out. The power thing always seems to be a recurring thread though or similar in a lot of cases.
I am in St.Louis, and they just said on newschannel 5 that each was shot 2 times, including the wife. There's the evidence I need to say he is guilty. A person commiting suicide would not have a very high chance of being able to shoot themselves twice.
Wife shot twice! Chris Vaughn must be missing many many brain cells.
I wonder if his original plan was to say a stranger did it. I wonder what his story will become now - what will he plead if the evidence against him is as overwhelming as it seems likely to be?
This was just what they said on the news-I have heard conflicting reports, whether she was shot once or twice. I am interested to hear which is right. Editing to say our local channel has in print she was shot once, so I was mistaken,or it was reported wrong.
http://www.ksdk.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=122694
This was just what they said on the news-I have heard conflicting reports, whether she was shot once or twice. I am interested to hear which is right. Editing to say our local channel has in print she was shot once, so I was mistaken,or it was reported wrong.
http://www.ksdk.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=122694
It will be interesting to follow the trial - unless he pleads guilty?
I wonder what the IL laws are that they were able to charge him with 8 counts?
Also glad to see they arrested him before the funeral - it must have been awful for the family at the wake yesterday...
Here is my guess about extradition. I think it is all about delay or speed. If you want to go to trial quickly, that is the DA does not have a strong case and you want them to have to go with what they have, you would waive extradition. or of for whatever reason you want o move ahead or look cooperative you would not fight it.--->>>Another contradiction as well I quote from this link:
"Glasgow said he hoped Vaughn would be extradited from Missouri to Illinois soon. He said Vaughn indicated he intended to fight extradition."
I believe it was one of Chico's links that said Vaughn would not fight extradiction, hmmm.
Fran, do you understand the nuances of fighting versus just being willing to go back to Illinois? I am not up on the legal aspects of this.
.
Here is my guess about extradition. I think it is all about delay or speed. If you want to go to trial quickly, that is the DA does not have a strong case and you want them to have to go with what they have, you would waive extradition. or of for whatever reason you want o move ahead or look cooperative you would not fight it.
If you need more time to prepare your defense and want to delay trial as long as possible, you would fight extradition. I think it is all about the time element because I don't think there is any trick to extradition.