- Joined
- Apr 16, 2021
- Messages
- 4,134
- Reaction score
- 30,961
It would surprise me, if.I still think the YBG sketch will ultimately end up being a nothingburger.
It would surprise me, if.I still think the YBG sketch will ultimately end up being a nothingburger.
It would surprise me, if.
I just heard on TV, that memory works at it's best, if the part of the brain, responsible for emotions, is affected while looking at someone. So a witness with great fear at that moment of watching someone/something would be a better witness, the expert said.My opinion is that eyewitness sketches are very often inaccurate anyway... people do not instantly memorize people's faces especially if nothing unusual is happening.
Think about it.. the last time TODAY you went to the bank, convenience store or drive thru at McDonalds.
Try to describe the face of the person who served you. Close your eyes...
See how difficult it is.
It would not surprise me that there were 2 different facial sketches from "witnesses"
However, describing what someone was wearing might be easier. Notice how when they are looking for someone they often say, last seen wearing a green jacket and black pants, for example.
Anyway, what do I know??
I just hope there is enough solid evidence to bring closure to the families of the girls - breaks my heart to see photos of them looking so young, beautiful and full of promise for positive productive lives that was taken from them. Sometimes in the past it even made me cry for the families and I don't know them.
I want the suspect to be treated fairly in jail as he waits for trial and I think he was being treated fairly. But I guess moving him gives less power to his defense about his treatment.
Finally the end is insight... JUSTICE PLEASE FOR THE GIRLS - hopefully it will bring answers and no doubt. Hopefully the modern touch DNA and other forensic tools, and other detective tools will totally close this case.
Regards
Laurel
04/20/2023 | Petition Filed Verified Request to Prohibit Public Access to a Court Record filed by State. Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 04/20/2023 |
04/20/2023 | Motion Filed State files Motion for Leave of Court to Subpoena Third-Party Records. Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 04/20/2023 |
04/20/2023 | Subpoena/Summons Filed Subpoena Duces Tecum filed. Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 04/20/2023 |
04/20/2023 | Petition Filed Verified Request to Prohibit Public Access to a Court Record filed by State. Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 04/20/2023 |
04/20/2023 | Motion Filed State files Motion for Leave of Court to Subpoena Third-Party Records. Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 04/20/2023 |
04/20/2023 | Subpoena/Summons Filed Subpoena Duces Tecum filed. File Stamp: 04/20/2023 |
04/20/2023 | Petition Filed Verified Request to Prohibit Public Access to a Court Record filed by State. Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 04/20/2023 |
04/20/2023 | Motion Filed State files Motion for Leave of Court to Subpoena Third-Party Records. Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 04/20/2023 |
04/20/2023 | Subpoena/Summons Filed Subpoena Duces Tecum filed. Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 04/20/2023 |
04/20/2023 | Petition Filed Verified Request to Prohibit Public Access to a Court Record filed by State. Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 04/20/2023 |
04/20/2023 | Motion Filed State files Motion for Leave of Court to Subpoena Third-Party Records. Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 04/20/2023 |
04/20/2023 | Subpoena/Summons Filed Subpoena Duces Tecum filed. Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 04/20/2023 |
06/15/2023 | Hearing Session: 06/15/2023 8:30 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Session: 06/16/2023 8:30 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ |
Why wouldn't the State call these witnesses? I think we'll hear from everyone that saw BG aka RA that day.I wonder if the witnesses that saw BG: 1) The lady who was at the bridge who walked back away from the bridge as he was approaching it 2) the teens who saw him at Freedom Bridge and 3) person who saw him muddy and bloody near the road back to his car... are NOT the one that help make the YBG sketch?
If so, they won't be at trial.. unless the defense uses the discovery documents to identify who that person was who gave that description.
I still think the YBG sketch will ultimately end up being a nothingburger.
Do we know what it all means? My guess was that it might be a subpoena for medical records from IDOC or from a medical facility. Pursuant to HIPAA regulations.Thanks @steeltowngirl for the public record. Here's a condensed version of what actions took place:
04/20/2023
Verified Request to Prohibit Public Access to a Court Record filed by State.
State files Motion for Leave of Court to Subpoena Third-Party Records.
Subpoena Duces Tecum filed.
Verified Request to Prohibit Public Access to a Court Record filed by State.
State files Motion for Leave of Court to Subpoena Third-Party Records.
Subpoena Duces Tecum filed.
Verified Request to Prohibit Public Access to a Court Record filed by State.
State files Motion for Leave of Court to Subpoena Third-Party Records.
Subpoena Duces Tecum filed.
Verified Request to Prohibit Public Access to a Court Record filed by State.
State files Motion for Leave of Court to Subpoena Third-Party Records.
Subpoena Duces Tecum filed.
Why wouldn't the State call these witnesses? I think we'll hear from everyone that saw BG aka RA that day.
JMO
Interesting, unlike a search warrant, a subpoena duces tecum can be issued without a showing of probable cause.
04/20/2023 Petition Filed
Verified Request to Prohibit Public Access to a Court Record filed by State.
Filed By:
State of Indiana
File Stamp:
04/20/202304/20/2023 Motion Filed
State files Motion for Leave of Court to Subpoena Third-Party Records.
Filed By:
State of Indiana
File Stamp:
04/20/202304/20/2023 Subpoena/Summons Filed
Subpoena Duces Tecum filed.
Filed By:
State of Indiana
File Stamp:
04/20/202304/20/2023 Petition Filed
Verified Request to Prohibit Public Access to a Court Record filed by State.
Filed By:
State of Indiana
File Stamp:
04/20/202304/20/2023 Motion Filed
State files Motion for Leave of Court to Subpoena Third-Party Records.
Filed By:
State of Indiana
File Stamp:
04/20/202304/20/2023 Subpoena/Summons Filed
Subpoena Duces Tecum filed.
File Stamp:
04/20/202304/20/2023 Petition Filed
Verified Request to Prohibit Public Access to a Court Record filed by State.
Filed By:
State of Indiana
File Stamp:
04/20/202304/20/2023 Motion Filed
State files Motion for Leave of Court to Subpoena Third-Party Records.
Filed By:
State of Indiana
File Stamp:
04/20/202304/20/2023 Subpoena/Summons Filed
Subpoena Duces Tecum filed.
Filed By:
State of Indiana
File Stamp:
04/20/202304/20/2023 Petition Filed
Verified Request to Prohibit Public Access to a Court Record filed by State.
Filed By:
State of Indiana
File Stamp:
04/20/202304/20/2023 Motion Filed
State files Motion for Leave of Court to Subpoena Third-Party Records.
Filed By:
State of Indiana
File Stamp:
04/20/202304/20/2023 Subpoena/Summons Filed
Subpoena Duces Tecum filed.
Filed By:
State of Indiana
File Stamp:
04/20/202306/15/2023 Hearing
Session:
06/15/2023 8:30 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ
Session:
06/16/2023 8:30 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ
Since I had absolutely no idea what a subpoena duces tecum is I had to Goog for it.Interesting, unlike a search warrant, a subpoena duces tecum can be issued without a showing of probable cause.
From what I can glean it appears it could be either way.So does this mean that the subpoena is for RA or another person? Or could this be for just records such as medical records?
I think so. In other cases, I've seen the entities named. Remember way back in the beginning there were subpoena duces decum filed naming phone companies.Why does the set of petition filed / motion filed / subpoena filed appear 4x on the Indiana case search file, all on 4/20/23?
Were 4 different entities served?